Yes, they fixed the security model and enforced it. That was intentional. It
did break a lot of sloppily programmed applications including some of
Microsoft's.
As I said before if your applications don't run on Vista there is nothing
stopping you from continuing to use XP. It is silly to upgrade to something
that you know doesn't work with a critical application. I like Vista. I use
it every day and have pretty much quit using XP (and Linux for that matter).
I have many customers similar to you. I would never recommend they upgrade
to Vista until their critical applications are supported in Vista. To go
back to the automobile analogy. Several years ago we switched from leaded
fuel to unleaded fuel. For quite a few years after this happened you could
still buy leaded fuel. As older cars were updated and ways found to make
them compatible with unleaded fuel, unleaded fuel became scarce. Unleaded
fuel is still available for race cars, airplanes, etc. It is not common but
it is available for those special applications. When a new Windows OS comes
out the same process happens. Windows 98 is now very scarce. Very few new
systems will even run it. Microsoft has dropped support for it. If you have
a critical app that will only run on it then you are like the race car
drivers. You have to get specialized equipment and find the right suppliers.
Windows XP will probably follow this route but it will be many years before
it reaches the point where win98 is now. In the mean time keep using it if
your apps don't run in Vista. No one is forcing you to change.
--
Kerry Brown
Microsoft MVP - Shell/User
http://www.vistahelp.ca
"Mike Schuler" <> wrote in message
news:AC021F83-824A-4211-9C46-...
> That is not a good analogy Mr. Brown. If I have a $2,500 program designed
> to
> run on Windows, and it works for every version of Windows from Windows 98
> through Windows XP, why shouldn't it be able to work for the next version
> of
> Windows? A better analogy would be if I bought a car that runs on
> gasoline,
> and the next month all the gas stations stopped selling gasoline and
> started
> selling kitchen grease instead.
>
> Upgrading the OS is nice, but does MicroSoft have to intentionally make
> all
> of our 2 year old software obsolete and unusable? MicroSoft had to have
> done
> something intentional to make programs that are designed to run on XP
> unable
> to run on Vista.
>
> "Kerry Brown" wrote:
>
>> If you have critical applications that don't support Vista then you are
>> right, Vista is not for you. The problem is not with Vista but with the
>> applications you are using. Your complaint is like buying a car that runs
>> on
>> diesel then complaining that when you put gasoline in the tank it doesn't
>> work. If you have critical applications then you match the OS to them. If
>> you have a critical OS then you match your applications to it.
>>
>> --
>> Kerry Brown
>> Microsoft MVP - Shell/User
>> http://www.vistahelp.ca
>>
>>
>> "Mike Schuler" <> wrote in message
>> news:5F3DFEEA-D826-4F03-9374-...
>> >I created a desktop shortcut icon for the execution file, and now I car
>> >run
>> > Works 4.5, but now there's another problem. When I work on a word
>> > processor
>> > file at home on this new Vista computer, and click 'save,' it saves it
>> > with a
>> > '.doc' file extension instead of '.wps' I emailed it to my office
>> > computer
>> > at work, but I already know that Works 4.5 can't read a .doc file. If
>> > it
>> > does open it, it won't be arranged the way I want it so I can print it.
>> >
>> > I've also found that my $2,500 FlexiSign program wont run on Vista at
>> > all.
>> > This really sucks. I want a computer that does what I tell it to do.
>> > I
>> > don't want a computer telling me what to do. I'm calling CompUSA
>> > tomorrow
>> > and see if they know how to take the Vista out of this thing and put XP
>> > in.
>> > Otherwise, I've got a brand new computer for sale, and I'm looking for
>> > an
>> > XP
>> > model that's not too old.
>> >
>> > "Kerry Brown" wrote:
>> >
>> >> You'll have to uninstall Works 8. At this point you'll probably have
>> >> to
>> >> uninstall both Works 4.5 and Works 8 then reinstall Works 4.5 to get
>> >> the
>> >> file associations set. You could also try right clicking on a file to
>> >> open
>> >> it. Pick Open with and browse to the Works 4.5 executable file.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Kerry Brown
>> >> Microsoft MVP - Shell/User
>> >> http://www.vistahelp.ca
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Mike Schuler" <> wrote in
>> >> message
>> >> news:A19322CA-FDBC-4DE1-B597-...
>> >> > You missed my point BobC. I also have been using Works 4.5 since it
>> >> > was
>> >> > first released. I've never used any later version. The later
>> >> > versions
>> >> > will
>> >> > not open the Works 4.5 files. I've installed Works 4.5 on my new
>> >> > Vista
>> >> > Computer. I have not yet loaded any of my business files into it
>> >> > yet
>> >> > because
>> >> > I can not get Works 4.5 to run. No matter what I do to open Works
>> >> > 4.5,
>> >> > the
>> >> > computer takes over and runs Works 8 in its place.
>> >> >
>> >> > "BobC" wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Mike Schuler" <Mike > wrote in
>> >> >> message
>> >> >> news:05DDC393-BB36-4347-B1BE-...
>> >> >> > All of my business files and books are made in MSWorks 4.5 for
>> >> >> > Windows
>> >> >> > 95.
>> >> >> > The newer versions of Works will not open up these files, so I've
>> >> >> > been
>> >> >> > continuing to use MSWorks 4.5 on my XP computer. I've installed
>> >> >> > in
>> >> >> > on
>> >> >> > my
>> >> >> > new
>> >> >> > Vista computer, but I can't make it run. If I try to open a
>> >> >> > file,
>> >> >> > it
>> >> >> > tries
>> >> >> > to open it in Works version 8 which can't open the file. How do
>> >> >> > I
>> >> >> > get
>> >> >> > it
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> > run MSWorks 4.5?
>> >> >> I have been running Works 4.5 since it was released years ago,no
>> >> >> problem
>> >> >> here on Vista; however.if your files were created in Works 8,I
>> >> >> suspect
>> >> >> you
>> >> >> will need to install "that" version to open your files.
>> >> >> Rgds
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
