Just how demented is LinTard Land anyhow?

Fix your date and time settings please, you are a couple days ahead of us.
--
Andre
Blog: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
My Vista Quickstart Guide:
http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog...3DB!9709.entry
"HangEveryRepubliKKKan" <> wrote in message
news:taq_i.13918$...
> Ahahahaha.. Lets see if I get this Demented Lintard reasoning right.
>
> Vista is a failure becuase after 300 days after it's release, it only has
> 7.5% of the OS market while the Lintard OS, is a shashing success because
> after 18 years after being released it has less than 2% (and falling) of
> the
> OS market.
>
> In Lintard Land, left is right, and up is down. Big is small and black
> is
> white.
>
> And that my little children is why Lintards will <NEVER> be capable of
> producing viable software.
>
>
>

In comp.os.linux.advocacy HangEveryRepubliKKKan <> wrote:

> In Lintard Land, left is right, and up is down. Big is small and black is
> white.
>
>

left is 'h'

right is 'l'

big is
owl@laptop:~$ figlet wintard
_ _ _
__ _(_)_ __ | |_ __ _ _ __ __| |
\ \ /\ / / | '_ \| __/ _` | '__/ _` |
\ V V /| | | | | || (_| | | | (_| |
\_/\_/ |_|_| |_|\__\__,_|_| \__,_|

owl@laptop:~$

black is 0x000000

In comp.os.linux.advocacy HangEveryRepubliKKKan <> wrote:
>
> HangEveryRepubliKKKan <> wrote:
>>> In Lintard Land, left is right, and up is down. Big is small and black
>>> is
>>> white.
>
> "owl" <> wrote
>> left is 'h'
>>
>> right is 'l'
>
> A fine example of the Lintard thought process.
>
>
It's not a thought process. It's muscle memory. Like how my wintarded
boss double-clicks on application buttons (!) over and over if something
doesn't happen in two seconds in XP. I've tried to tell him that the
wait-cursor is always there for at least five seconds in XP, no matter
what you do, but it's no use. And MS wants to give Vista to *this*
guy?

HangEveryRepubliKKKan wrote:
> Ahahahaha.. Lets see if I get this Demented Lintard reasoning right.
>
> Vista is a failure becuase after 300 days after it's release, it only has
> 7.5% of the OS market while the Lintard OS, is a shashing success because
> after 18 years after being released it has less than 2% (and falling) of the
> OS market.

Hell, arms, pornography and drugs are sold more than Vista, XP, Apple
and Linux combined but that doesn't make them "good" products.

That said, most people have been trained to be good little Wintards and
see no reason to change. Only adventurous, open minded and free thinking
people would consider Linux. The good thing is that its geek rep is
disappearing as word is getting round that it's easier to install, use
and back up than the Vista Virus (no matter how widespread the Vista
Virus infection is).

--
Alias
To email me, remove the word "shoes" from my email address

"Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin]" <> wrote in
news:#:

> Fix your date and time settings please, you are a couple days ahead of
> us.

He obviously hasn't figured out how to do that in Windows yet.

Alias wrote:

> HangEveryRepubliKKKan wrote:
>
>> Ahahahaha.. Lets see if I get this Demented Lintard reasoning right.
>>
>> Vista is a failure becuase after 300 days after it's release, it only has
>> 7.5% of the OS market while the Lintard OS, is a shashing success because
>> after 18 years after being released it has less than 2% (and falling)
>> of the
>> OS market.
>
>
> Hell, arms, pornography and drugs are sold more than Vista, XP, Apple
> and Linux combined but that doesn't make them "good" products.
>
> That said, most people have been trained to be good little Wintards and
> see no reason to change.

What a dumb fukkin statement that is. Of course, it expected from
linturds like you.

Only adventurous, open minded and free thinking
> people would consider Linux.

Bullsh*t! Broke muther fukkers...like you...are the biggest supporters
of open sores sh*t....

The good thing is that its geek rep is
> disappearing as word is getting round that it's easier to install, use
> and back up than the Vista Virus (no matter how widespread the Vista
> Virus infection is).

More stupid lies from mr liar?
Expected!
Frank
>

"HangEveryRepubliKKKan" <> wrote in
news:taq_i.13918$:

> Ahahahaha.. Lets see if I get this Demented Lintard reasoning right.
>
> Vista is a failure becuase after 300 days after it's release, it only
> has 7.5% of the OS market while the Lintard OS, is a shashing success
> because after 18 years after being released it has less than 2% (and
> falling) of the OS market.

Vista is not a failure, unlike your parents.

Not a commercial failure anyway. It can't be a failure based on the fact
that MS has had the OEMS roped in since the late 80's.

What Vista seems to fail on is the 'WOW' factor that MS advertised. It was
expected for Vista to be a major upgrade from XP. It's not. Many of the
major features, that are somewhat innovative and new were pulled from Vista
before it's release because 6 or 7 years wasn't enough development time for
MS to make them work properly.

One indication of it's laskluster appeal, is that MS has said, by it's own
estimates, that going into 2008, WindowsXP will bring in 22% of the income.

That's not a good sign.

As everyone like to make automobile analogies, let's look at this one.

Toyota. Toyota started selling cars in the USA about 50 years ago. Just
this past year, Toyota vehicles outsold GM for the very first time.

So Toyota is a loser company and their products are trash because it took
50 years to do so ?

"DanS" <> wrote in message
news:Xns99E7C8B2B19BFthisnthatadelphianet@216.196. 97.142...
> "Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin]" <> wrote in
> news:#:
>
>> Fix your date and time settings please, you are a couple days ahead of
>> us.
>
> He obviously hasn't figured out how to do that in Windows yet.


Or he will keep his post up top for 2 days (for those whom sort by Sent).

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> HangEveryRepubliKKKan wrote:
>>
>>> Ahahahaha.. Lets see if I get this Demented Lintard reasoning right.
>>>
>>> Vista is a failure becuase after 300 days after it's release, it only
>>> has
>>> 7.5% of the OS market while the Lintard OS, is a shashing success
>>> because
>>> after 18 years after being released it has less than 2% (and falling)
>>> of the
>>> OS market.
>>
>>
>> Hell, arms, pornography and drugs are sold more than Vista, XP, Apple
>> and Linux combined but that doesn't make them "good" products.
>>
>> That said, most people have been trained to be good little Wintards
>> and see no reason to change.
>
> What a dumb fukkin statement that is. Of course, it expected from
> linturds like you.

You're not expected to understand.

>
> Only adventurous, open minded and free thinking
>> people would consider Linux.
>
> Bullsh*t! Broke muther fukkers...like you...are the biggest supporters
> of open sores sh*t....

You're not expected to understand.

>
> The good thing is that its geek rep is
>> disappearing as word is getting round that it's easier to install, use
>> and back up than the Vista Virus (no matter how widespread the Vista
>> Virus infection is).
>
> More stupid lies from mr liar?
> Expected!
> Frank

You're not expected to understand.

--
Alias
To email me, remove the word "shoes" from my email address

Hey, I Am A Die Hard Right Wing Republican, And I Hate Microsoft Too,
And Love To Use Open Source Linux Ubuntu 7.10 RTW, Just FYI. P.S. I Look
Forward To The Day When The European Union Puts Microsoft Out Of
Business For Their Anti-Trust Behavior, Also Just FYI.