Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista General Discussion > Just setting the facts straight about the lies of the Troll Mark Conrad

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Just setting the facts straight about the lies of the Troll Mark Conrad

 
 
andy t
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-06-2010

"Mark Conrad" The Troll with a hidden agenda


>>(Do you keep a scrapbook or something? Why are you
>> obsessing so about this person?


I doubt whether he keeps a scrapbook or record of anything because if he
did, he would then see all of his own lies, deceit, cheating and fraudulency
in his own words on context and in black-and-white!

> Dunno, just seems the thing for me to do.



To try and backpedal with all your life even though you have already been
found out on the WWW as a lying, cheating fraudulent Troll being caught out
with this and all your lies. Where they all can be checked out quite easily
by going through your previous postings because they are in your own words,
your own context and in black on white for everybody to see in this news
group.


> Seems to me if a person just lets lies stand unchallenged,
> then they are admitting to all that those lies are true.


You do not need admit those lies. We have the evidence on the WWW of
EXACTLY what you said in your previous postings that PROVE all of your lies.
So it is no good stating above about leaving something unchallenged when the
horse has already bolted and the PURE EVIDENCE of your lies are there on the
WWW for everybody to see with their own eyes!


> What I can't figure out is why people lie, considering
> it destroys their own credibility.



No, what you can't figure out, is how easily you got exposed on the WWW as
being the lying, cheating fraudulent Troll that you are and who has left a
whole load of evidence behind in your own posts as proof that you are.

My credibility is intact. The only credibility that has been destroyed is
your own because of the insurmountable amount of EVIDENCE and PROOF that you
have left on the WWW in your own words, your own context and in black on
white for everybody in this news group to see.

> I know I would never believe anything that "andy t"
> posts any more, considering his past record of lying.



Nice try and backpedal in trying to deflect what the real truth is.

Where is your proof that I have lied? You haven't any because I have been
telling the truth about your lies, deceit and fraudulency and I have backed
it up with proof and evidence by exposing your past posts. They are all
there in your own words, your own context and in black on white on the WWW
for anybody and everybody to see with their own eyes in this news group.

Here are a list of your lies to date:

1. I dictated the test document in the typing/dictation speed test. (He
actually copied and pasted it several times over)

2. It is conceivable that Dragon would be able to interpret somebody
properly, speaking at 600 wpm.

3. It is conceivable that Dragon would be able to interpret somebody
properly, speaking at 600 wpm AND be a 100% accurate.

4. I can dictate 836 wpm

5. I can dictate 836 wpm with 100% accuracy

6. I reckon I could dictate 320 wpm

7. I reckon I could dictate 320 wpm with 100% accuracy using Dragon

8. I can dictate 307.2 wpm

9. I can dictate 307.2 wpm with 100% accuracy using Dragon

10. I can dictate 260 wpm

11. I can dictate 260 wpm with 100% accuracy using Dragon

12. I can dictate 200 wpm

13. I can dictate 200 wpm with 100% accuracy using Dragon

14. I can dictate 150 wpm with 100% accuracy every time using Dragon.

15. I do not copy and paste my sample test documents that I put in this
newsgroup for all the WWW to see.

16. A typist speed test cannot be compared or measured to dictation speed in
wpm.

17. I know how the WSR toolkit would perform when used in conjunction with
WSR, even though I do not own a copy of the software.

18. The WSR toolkit has to have a reviewer in it to enhance accuracy. All of
the other features within it will not perform this function.

19. WSR is crap.

20. I am not a liar.

21. I am not a cheat.

22. I am not a bullshitter.

23. I am not a fraudulent troll

24. I am an expert in the field of speech recognition.

25. I know what a homonym is.

26. I know what a homophone is.

27. Spelling correctly is not important.

28. I am not a salesman promoting Dragon in this news group

29. Tutu is a homonym of to, too and two.

30. Tutu is a homophone of to, too and two.


31. The words to, too and two do not come out spelt correctly when used in
context dictating with Dragon and WSR.

32. I was only trying to ridicule Andy regarding the 836 wpm speed dictation
test scenario

33. I do not make up my own rules regarding speech dictation speed and
accuracy.

34. I do not backpedal.


andy t






 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"WindowsUpdate_80073715" Brenda Windows Update 4 03-03-2010 12:46 AM
Why does Mark Conrad keep putting his foot in his mouth? andy t Windows Vista General Discussion 5 02-09-2010 04:44 PM
Re: Why is Mark Conrad so thick? News Forum Check Windows Vista General Discussion 0 01-31-2010 03:10 PM
Mark Conrad needs a new brain transplant andy t Windows Vista General Discussion 0 01-30-2010 03:17 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59