From the Security Bulletin:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec.../MS08-071.mspx
> Support
> • Customers in the U.S. and Canada can receive technical support from Microsoft Product Support
> Services (http://www.microsoft.com/protect/res...upport.aspx)at 1-866-PCSAFETY. There is no
> charge for support calls that are associated with security updates.
> • International customers can receive support from their local Microsoft subsidiaries. There is no
> charge for support that is associated with security updates. For more information about how to
> contact Microsoft for support issues, visit the International Support Web site
> http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=21155
If this an LOB application, contact MS for no-charge support.
If this application was written by you,, your company, or someone your
company
hired to code it, then suggest you go over the Vulnerability Information
in the Security Bulletin to see what changes have been made to how GDI
handles integer calculations and file size parameters in WMF files.
MowGreen
===============
*-343-* FDNY
Never Forgotten
===============
banthecheck.com
"Security updates should *not* have *non-security content* prechecked"
POZ.James wrote:
> Hi there, wonder if anyone can help - the above gdi32.dll version seems to
> cause one of our applications to crash on spanish pc's.
>
> For info, the version prior to this (5.1.2600.5512) works fine, however
> following installation of KB956802 update (which installs 5.1.2600.5698) our
> application crashes with a nice "Report to MS" type error.
>
> This only appears to happen on SPANISH versions of XP as the application
> continues to work without any problems on english XP with the same KB update
> (albeit the english version) installed.
>
> This has been reported to us by a number of our spanish users, and can be
> reproduced on a VM by simply installing this update.
>
> I have tried rebuilding our application on a PC which has this version of
> the dll and everything is fine until deployed on a spanish pc.
>
> Any help greatfully received.
>
> Thanks,
> James.