last and final (I hope) question

Why do we have to name a 'user'.
Why can't we just leave it as Administrator?
If there is only one user of the computer.

That way you wouldn't have to choose from that selection screen upon boot up
and most of the permissions would be less intrusive.

"FireBrick" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Why do we have to name a 'user'.
> Why can't we just leave it as Administrator?
> If there is only one user of the computer.
>
> That way you wouldn't have to choose from that selection screen upon boot
> up
> and most of the permissions would be less intrusive.
>


Read the SEVEN replies to your last post about this, posted at 17.59 pm.

--
Asking a question?
Please tell us the version of the application you are asking about,
your OS, Service Pack level
and the FULL contents of any error message(s)

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:06:06 -0600, FireBrick wrote:

> Why do we have to name a 'user'.
> Why can't we just leave it as Administrator? If there is only one user
> of the computer.
>
> That way you wouldn't have to choose from that selection screen upon
> boot up and most of the permissions would be less intrusive.

And the system would be more open to malware attacks than it already is.

You posted the same Q yesterday, the answers havnt changed

"FireBrick" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Why do we have to name a 'user'.
> Why can't we just leave it as Administrator?
> If there is only one user of the computer.
>
> That way you wouldn't have to choose from that selection screen upon boot
> up
> and most of the permissions would be less intrusive.
>

I'm sorry guys
Yesterday ComCrap went down for 3 hours and I think my messages got trashed.
In the whole newgroup, I've searched and the replies you mention did not
make it to my computer....for whatever reason..



"DL" <address@invalid> wrote in message
news:...
> You posted the same Q yesterday, the answers havnt changed
>
> "FireBrick" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> Why do we have to name a 'user'.
>> Why can't we just leave it as Administrator?
>> If there is only one user of the computer.
>>
>> That way you wouldn't have to choose from that selection screen upon boot
>> up
>> and most of the permissions would be less intrusive.
>>
>
>

"Gordon" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> "FireBrick" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> Why do we have to name a 'user'.
>> Why can't we just leave it as Administrator?
>> If there is only one user of the computer.
>>
>> That way you wouldn't have to choose from that selection screen upon boot
>> up
>> and most of the permissions would be less intrusive.
>>
>
>
> Read the SEVEN replies to your last post about this, posted at 17.59 pm.
>
> --
You should remove the Administrator account from your machine. You need to
save yourself from your stupidity

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:19:43 -0800, measekite's psychiatrist wrote:

> "Gordon" <> wrote in message
> news:%...
>> "FireBrick" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>> Why do we have to name a 'user'.
>>> Why can't we just leave it as Administrator?
>>> If there is only one user of the computer.
>>>
>>> That way you wouldn't have to choose from that selection screen upon boot
>>> up
>>> and most of the permissions would be less intrusive.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Read the SEVEN replies to your last post about this, posted at 17.59 pm.
>>
>> --
> You should remove the Administrator account from your machine. You need to
> save yourself from your stupidity

God forbid that he winds up like you.