"tom12010" <> wrote in message
news:b96cbbca-36cd-43a5-b42c-...
On Mar 16, 5:30 pm, "Lawrence Garvin [MVP]" <lawre...@news.postalias>
wrote:
> > tom12010 wrote:
> >> 1. How can WSUS be told to automatically decline all updates more than
> >> X months old?? Say 6 months??
>
> It cannot.
It would also cause a lot of headaches. Who's to say an update should be
automatically declined based on a time period? There's some updates from
five years ago that still need to be installed; have never been superceded.
> too bad...that would save a lot of time.
How much time do you need to save. Create a custom view with the updates you
want to decline, select All, and click on Decline.
>It seems like all Security and Critical should be auto-approved, then
>updates and update rollups should be reviewed and manually approved.
Maybe for you... but the majority of people deploying WSUS are doing so
because they want direct approval authority over EACH and EVERY update
distributed in their enterprise. Why expend effort deploying a server that
does exactly what Automatic Updates already does, and has been doing, for
the past ten years?
> >> 3. How to ensure that all 'Patch Tuesday' updates are included for all
> >> the servers??
>
> Approve them???
>No, I meant that I have read things like such-and-such updates will be
>included in WSUS etc. etc.,
Hmm... well, if that's the extent of your reading, then I'd offer two
additional "learning" suggestions:
1. READ the WSUS Getting Started and WSUS Deployment guides.
2. Set up a WSUS Server in a =TEST= environment and observe how it actually
works.
The "such-and-such" will be included in WSUS is to distinguish from those
updates that are not -- which typically are untested HOTFIXes not meant for
general distribution.
>and my question is if WSUS does not
>automatically include all 'Patch Tuesday' patches FOR approval, then I
>might as well not use it.
WSUS can include ALL updates published to the Microsoft Update site; whether
it does, or not, is dependent on which classifications of updates you choose
to manage from your particular WSUS Server.
>P.S. I had trouble with your site in Firefox 3.0.7 -- things that
>display in IE 7.x don't display in FF 3.0.7...
Bummer. Except that it's not an IE7 site. It's like an IE5 site. The site is
based on a Frontpage 2000 template. There isn't even any ASP in the site,
it's pure, raw, HTML (with Frontpage extensions), albeit probably only HTML
v3.2 to be honest.
What specifically was the problem you encountered?
--
Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP(x2), MCTS(x5), MCP(x7), MCBMSP
Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas
Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009)
MS WSUS Website:
http://www.microsoft.com/wsus
My Websites:
http://www.onsitechsolutions.com;
http://wsusinfo.onsitechsolutions.com
My MVP Profile:
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/pro...awrence.Garvin