Malicious software removal tool caused blue screens in win 2000

The above error was caused on my desktop and laptop using W2000 requiring
reloading of the operating system. I am now using xp pro SP 2, can I safely
load MST??

"fred" <> wrote in message
news:0A5D9ECA-5EE6-430F-8685-...
> The above error was caused on my desktop and laptop using W2000 requiring
> reloading of the operating system. I am now using xp pro SP 2, can I
> safely
> load MST??
I certainly don't know whether you personally can safely run MRT. Operating
systems as so very very complex that what runs almost everywhere may not run
on a particular system.

I can assure you however that it has run successfully on my SP2 machines
since it first appeared.. It has never found anything and has never caused
a single problem.
Jim

"Jim" wrote:

>
> "fred" <> wrote in message
> news:0A5D9ECA-5EE6-430F-8685-...
> > The above error was caused on my desktop and laptop using W2000 requiring
> > reloading of the operating system. I am now using xp pro SP 2, can I
> > safely
> > load MST??
> I certainly don't know whether you personally can safely run MRT. Operating
> systems as so very very complex that what runs almost everywhere may not run
> on a particular system.
>
> I can assure you however that it has run successfully on my SP2 machines
> since it first appeared.. It has never found anything and has never caused
> a single problem.
> Jim
>
>
>

"Jim" wrote:

>
> "fred" <> wrote in message
> news:0A5D9ECA-5EE6-430F-8685-...
> > The above error was caused on my desktop and laptop using W2000 requiring
> > reloading of the operating system. I am now using xp pro SP 2, can I
> > safely
> > load MST??
> I certainly don't know whether you personally can safely run MRT. Operating
> systems as so very very complex that what runs almost everywhere may not run
> on a particular system.
>
> I can assure you however that it has run successfully on my SP2 machines
> since it first appeared.. It has never found anything and has never caused
> a single problem.
> Jim
>
> Thank you Jim, your reply answered my query, Fred
>