Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Server > How many CPUs can ws03 effectively handle?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

How many CPUs can ws03 effectively handle?

 
 
ToddAndMargo
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-03-2010
Hi All,

I have a Windows Server 2003 SO2 running in a virtual
machine. I have 12 available cores. I gave WS03 8 of them.

Just out of curiosity, is there a point were too many
cores slow WS2003 down?

Many thanks,
-T
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
ToddAndMargo
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-03-2010
On 05/03/2010 10:20 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a Windows Server 2003 SO2 running in a virtual
> machine. I have 12 available cores. I gave WS03 8 of them.
>
> Just out of curiosity, is there a point were too many
> cores slow WS2003 down?
>
> Many thanks,
> -T


Sorry. I meant WS2008.
 
Reply With Quote
 
ToddAndMargo
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-03-2010
On 05/03/2010 04:52 PM, Bill Kearney wrote:
>
> "ToddAndMargo" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have a Windows Server 2003 SO2 running in a virtual
>> machine. I have 12 available cores. I gave WS03 8 of them.
>>
>> Just out of curiosity, is there a point were too many
>> cores slow WS2003 down?

>
> Cores doing what? The software generally won't spread a limited number
> of tasks across multiple cores. It's up to programs that can use the
> threads to start seeing greater use of multiple cores. What apps are you
> running on the box?


Mainly Quick Books.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Leythos
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-04-2010
In article <>,
says...
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have a Windows Server 2003 SO2 running in a virtual
> machine. I have 12 available cores. I gave WS03 8 of them.
>
> Just out of curiosity, is there a point were too many
> cores slow WS2003 down?


I have run SQL 2000 server on a Win 2003 server where having 4 CPU's
with a total of 8 cores caused queries to fail by blocking each other.
With that said, since we could not change the queries we limited
parallelisms for SQL and the queries flew (were fast).

QB doesn't really have a real database. Since the server component
doesn't really do a lot, on the server, your delays will be file sharing
as well as workstation performance. That's been my experience since DB
2003 to 2010.



--
You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little
voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that.
Trust yourself.
(remove 999 for proper email address)
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thunking a 32-bit HANDLE to a 64-bit HANDLE John Bond Windows Vista Drivers 3 01-11-2010 05:50 PM
Convert user mode handle to event structure? Richard Lewis Haggard Windows Vista Drivers 3 12-06-2009 05:17 AM
How detect if handle returned by PsGetCurrentProcessID is valid ?existing always process ? Mathieu Windows Vista Drivers 2 11-25-2009 06:36 PM
notification handle polarx Windows Server 1 11-11-2009 06:25 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59