In article <>,
says...
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have a Windows Server 2003 SO2 running in a virtual
> machine. I have 12 available cores. I gave WS03 8 of them.
>
> Just out of curiosity, is there a point were too many
> cores slow WS2003 down?
I have run SQL 2000 server on a Win 2003 server where having 4 CPU's
with a total of 8 cores caused queries to fail by blocking each other.
With that said, since we could not change the queries we limited
parallelisms for SQL and the queries flew (were fast).
QB doesn't really have a real database. Since the server component
doesn't really do a lot, on the server, your delays will be file sharing
as well as workstation performance. That's been my experience since DB
2003 to 2010.
--
You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little
voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that.
Trust yourself.
(remove 999 for proper email address)