virtual server huh, sure, slap a name and IP resource on there and i guess
you have a virtual server... or is he talking about Virtual Server and
virtualizing on a cluster (which is what you find if you google this)
i think what he was getting at was the name/ip pair and im sure there is
some limit, but i dont know it, and im sure its not small...
i will say its probably more than you should ever put in one cluster.
i guess the idea of a resource group could be a "virtual server" where you
would assign resources to a group, much like SQL does, giving it a name, ip,
disk, and related services for that app...
its a pretty poorly worded question
"Spin" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Gurus,
>
> I went on a job interview yesterday and I was asked "how many virtual
> servers can you have on a cluster?" I said one but he said I was wrong.
> I come from experience of two-node clusters, where Exchange was installed
> and there was only one Virtual server in these instances, which was the
> name that clients connected to in order to reach their mailbox. Am I
> missing something here?
>
> --
> Spin
|