Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista General Discussion > "Mark Conrad" - Buffoon backpedal expert extraordinaire!

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

"Mark Conrad" - Buffoon backpedal expert extraordinaire!

 
 
andy t
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-02-2010

"Mark Conrad" - Buffoon backpedal expert extraordinaire!




On digging around, I came across a post of Conrad's that I must have missed
along the way. It is entitled "I rely on the ignorance of strangers<g>
(speech recognition)".

In it, he frantically tries to dig his way out of an almost apologetic
situation doing what he does best, backpedalling.

It is quite funny and l-o-n-g - w-i-n-d-e-d in his attempt to get out of
the mire he has got himself in. Read on:


>"My Great Speech Recognition Plan" succeeded,
>beyond all my expectations.



R - i - g - h - t


>More people are discussing SR recently, than have been
>discussing it in all of the past year, Whoopee !



Read between the lines asshole. Most people are not interested in a lying
cheating fraudster who tries to pull the wool over everybody's eyes with his
bullshit by saying he can dictate 836 wpm.


YOU TOOK THE TEST- mah-ha mah-ha mah-ha mah ha-ha-ha- AND GOT CAUGHT
RED-HANDED CHEATING ON THE WWW mah-ha mah-ha mah-ha ha-ha-ha-ha-ha! FOR ALL
THE WORLD TO SEE! mah-ha mah-ha mah-ha ha HOW STUPID CAN YOU GET!
MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA!


WHAT A PRAT!


>For it to succeed, I needed some incredibly stupid people,
>which this NG is blessed with, in the persons of "andy t"
>and his stupid buddy "Russ" a MVP (Most Revolting Person)



R - i - g - h - t


Nice try ;-).


The only stupid person in this newsgroup is Troll Conrad. By saying that
when he dictated to the end of the test document, he started again dictating
the same document.

MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA!

WHAT A DORK!


Then he wanted everybody to believe that he kept on dictating the same
document until he reached his fantastic achievement of dictating 836 wpm. He
then hoped that nobody would find out he was actually copying and pasting
the test document in over and over again.
MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA!


>Can you believe this, they both are so stupid that they
>actually thought that my tongue-in-check claim of dictating
>at 836 wpm was serious,



R - i - g - h - t


Then why do you feel the need to post several of your posts to try and
justify what you really meant? When in reality everybody now knows that if
you hadn't been caught as a cheat, you would have stuck to your guns as you
always do, you little lying cheating fraudulent troll!
You can see now how frantically he is trying to backpedal by this long
tirade of a post (and others) trying to justify and get out of why he said
he could dictate 836 wpm. Tongue in cheek? A likely story!


Pull the other one Conrad, it's got bells on it! ;-)


MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA!


>while all the other reasonable people here knew that I was ridiculing
>Andy's typing-speed
> website,



R - i - g - h - t


Who is the one being ridiculed now!


Because he has been found out as the lying cheating fraudulent troll who
just copies and pastes his so-called *complicated text* down on paper and
then says he has dictated it with 100% accuracy.


What is it? Think of a number and multiply it by whatever? Then copy and
paste it down!


836 wpm, 600 wpm, 320 wpm, 307.2 wpm, 260 wpm, 200 wpm, 150 wpm all with
100% accuracy!


I wish you would make up your mind which one it is!


MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA!


> which Andy loudly and repeatedly trumpeted
> was going to reveal my true dictation speed to the world.



>The website reveals no such thing,



In your case no, because you did not dictate anything.


You simply cheated because you were not getting anywhere. You were not
supposed to copy and paste the words, a child of seven could have done that.
You were supposed to dictate them as I did. You must learn that dictation is
a totally different task than copying and pasting tsk tsk.


As any psychologist would say; this is a classic symptom of the break
backpedal dance by a nervous stuttering buffoon!


MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA!


>it only reveals that
>anyone who wants to can fool the test, which I showed.



Tsk tsk! Nice try but that just doesn't cut the mustard. ;-)


No Troll Conrad. It only reveals that you cheated by copying and pasting
the text in the test document instead of dictating them. Because you
couldn't even dictate *normal English text words* at a fraction of the wpm
count that you pretend you can do.


And as for getting them all 100% accurate..... MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA!


You can see it has certainly got to him. This is what happens when you get
found out lying and cheating on the WWW for everybody to see with their own
eyes. A classic case of ferociously trying to backpedal when the horse has
already bolted. ;-)


>NO typing test can accurately gauge dictation speed, and
>the practice of Nuance (Dragon) using the term "wpm" in
>their advertising does NOT change that hard fact.



R - i - g - h - t


If So you are right and everybody else in the world is wrong, is that it?
(This is a classic case of insanity. Where somebody believes everybody else
in the world is wrong except himself.)


Read this: http://www.dragonvoicerecognition.co...ofessional.cfm
Your company compares like-for-like typing-speed with dictation speed.
Clear proof. Where is yours?


>The only half-ways accurate gauge of dictation speed is
>to post the article being dictated, then allow the person
>being "timed" to thoroughly familiarize himself with all
>the words in the article, including their pronunciation.



R - i - g - h - t


By the time you have done all that, it would be quicker to type.


Besides, in that test document, you did not need to make any macros. All
the words were standard English ones and there was nothing there that wasn't
already in both speech apps vocabulary already. AND a typist does not see
their documents ahead of time Mr. make it up as you go along man.


Still didn't stop you copying and pasting the words and putting it on the
WWW in a bid to try and fool everybody into believing that you dictated 836
wpm did it.


You can see clearly, being caught out lying and cheating red-handed on the
WWW is bothering him.


TOO LATE SUCKER!!!


MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA!


>Furthermore, rules have to be established...



Yeh, your own made up rules!
Backpedal-a- Backpedal-a- Backpedal-a- Backpedal-a- Backpedal-a- Backpedal.


I bet your arm is hurting from all the backpedalling you are doing!


MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA!


>Furthermore, rules have to be established ahead of time
>as regards whether the identical article can be
>"scanned in" as a text document.



R - i - g - h - t


You may be able to pull the wool over some people's eyes or a novice, but
you do not fool me for a minute!


You did not have to make any text macros to dictate and complete that text.
You didn't need to scan anything to dictate and complete that text. Every
word in the document was already in both WSR and Dragon's vocabulary and I
completed it fine with both WSR and Dragon without the need to do any of
that.


You spout more bullshit than a herd of buffalo!


>I generally allow the test text article to be scanned in
>ahead of time, because that reduces homonym errors
>such as "or ore are" etc. - - - also reduces errors
>caused by slightly mispronounced words.



R - i - g - h - t


I did not have any problems with homonyms because as I've been saying all
along, when the words are dictated in context as in the test, text document,
they come out fine using WSR and Dragon.
(So uncomfortable watching him squeal and squirm like a wriggly squiggly
snake trying to justify his bullshit).


>The question "Will that be bee flying south?" is
>a grammatically incorrect question.



The Poor man is having a nervous breakdown trying to backpedal that hard.
It is kicking in his dementia even harder now. Because he has been found out
on the WWW as a lying cheating fraudster, he's bringing up his little buzzy
bee test again that I passed eons ago in about 20 seconds!


Desperate measures indeed!


MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA! MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA!


Serves you right for being a lying, cheating, fraudulent troll and everybody
can see all your bullshit quite easily by looking back on your old posts
which are there in black on white, in your own words and all in your own
context!


Gotcha Mr. Bullshitter!

MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA! MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA! MAH-HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA! MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA!


You can see above I can hardly contain my hysteria and glee in snagging this
dropout.


I did the above by what he does best. Yes, you guessed it, by copying and
pasting as he does with all of his so-called tests that he posts on the Web
in a vague attempt to impress us all. (I suspected this all along).


But I am not as fast as him at copying and pasting!


MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA! MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA


He is the fastest copy and paste expert in the West.


MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA! MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA! MAH-HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA! MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA!


>Only then, after a few practice run-throughs, can the
>person being timed, be gauged on dictation speed.



R - i - g - h - t


You keep believing that along with Mary Poppins and the tooth fairy!


Looks as if you need quite a few practice run-throughs to dictate a simple
test, text document as shown on that website. By the time you have done
that, all of the typists would have gone home.


>Dictation speed varies radically, depending on
>the type of article being dictated.



I know. That's why I gave you a completely simple test that was not too
long. That did not contain any unusual lengthy words. Where there was no
need to make any text macros and did not need any futuristic scanning device
that you keep commenting on BECAUSE ALL THE WORDS WERE ALREADY THERE IN
WSR's AND DRAGON'S VOCABULARY AS STANDARD. Capitalisation and punctuation
had to be achieved just as you would in ANY document **** for brains.


I managed to do it okay using both speech apps without needing to do any of
that! The proof is on the website under my name. You haven't any! All you
have proved is how well you can cheat in front of everybody on the WWW! What
an achievement, you must be really proud of yourself.


And you cannot use your lame excuse of counting blocks of words and dividing
by five because the test automatically gave you a read-out on its own of
your wpm count. You didn't even need to watch the clock because it timed
you automatically as well.


>ANY mistakes, even in punctuation, then the speed
>results are inaccurate, test has to be done over.



Yawn! Read the above jackass. Capitalisation and punctuation have to be
performed in any document you buffoon! You saw my test results by taking
the test under my name, performed without any need to cheat and including
all capitalisation and punctuation! If I can do it, why can't you?


I'll tell you why. Because you are incapable of telling the truth and all
your silly little test documents with their *so-called impressive medical
jargon* are simply copied and pasted YAWN! Nobody believes a word you say
anymore now because the cat is out of the bag and the horse has bolted as
they say.


>Allowances CAN be made for very long articles, say
>for example allowing one mistake every 600 words,
>on average.



Another rule change made up by the backpedalling maestro. Bang goes your
100% accuracy theory then if you are allowing a mistake. ;-)


>Darn, thought would catch Andy again with my included
>"mistake" above, i.e. "MVP (Most Revolting Person)"



How pathetic! Nice try loser!


>He must be getting wise to me...



Not just me, but the whole World Wide Web, with your copying and pasting
triumphs.


>Eye find that spelin erors ar enoter gud weigh too git thee goot
>uf thees guise.



No need to pretend using your bad spelling as a smokescreen to avoid the
real issue. And everybody knows what that is now.


That you have been found out on the WWW for everybody to see. That you lied
and cheated to try and prove how great you are at your so called *supreme*
dictation. Now everybody now knows you cheated the test because there was
no way you could prove your ridiculous claims so therefore resorted to
copying and pasting in a desperate bid to save face!


How sad can you get!


MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA! MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA! MAH-HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA! MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA
MAH-HA MAH-HA HA MAH-HA MAH-HA MAH-HA HA HA!


andy t


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Mark Conrad" - Buffoon backpedal expert extraordinaire! andy t Windows Vista General Discussion 0 03-02-2010 09:58 AM
"Mark Conrad" - Buffoon backpedal expert extraordinaire! andy t Windows Vista General Discussion 0 03-02-2010 05:28 AM
Re: Keeping my eye on the troll "Mark Conrad" andy t Windows Vista General Discussion 0 02-16-2010 02:27 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59