I give you more evidence, of how far from reality Mark Conrad is! Imbecile!
Firstly, Mark Conrad is not his real name, it is a made up name because it
makes him feel sexy and because he hides behind it!
This is just some of of his bullshit!
> in another thread, the definition of a list varies
> depending on which dictionary we look it up in.
Trying to backtrack above and the slippery eel tries to wriggle out of
another of his lies but it has backfired on him!
> Below is a horizontal list enclosed in braces:
>
> {T hat th ati sis t ha ttha tisn o ti snot}
>
>
> Same list, only this time it is a vertical list,
> so the enclosing braces are not needed:
<SNIP THE REST OF THE BULLSHIT!> Who are you trying to kid?
This is a sad individual, vigorously trying to justify and wriggle out of a
statement he produced on screen, which he got hopelessly wrong and STILL he
has not proven what the definition of a list is.
In his idea of what he thinks the definition of a list is, he tries to lie
himself out of a situation with a bunch of his explanations, ridiculously
lengthy, but still does not prove anything and are utterly untrue!
Stop trying to backtrack Mr. Slippery, your LIES do not fool anyone and you
got it wrong!
There is your proof below!
http://uk.encarta.msn.com/dictionary_/list.html
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/list
http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/list_1?view=uk
List: noun - A series of related words, names, numbers or other items that
are arranged in order, ONE AFTER THE OTHER
List: transitive verb - To arrange a series of related words, names, numbers
or other items that are arranged in order, ONE AFTER THE OTHER
You posted this all by yourself, meaning; this is your own quote, meaning;
this is what you thought the definition of a list meant!
ALL YOUR OWN WORK!
> list (noun)
> -------
> A number of connected items or names written or printed
> consecutively, *typically one below the other*.
Now you show me the URL where it says the wording you posted above between
the two asterisks, regarding the definition of the word 'list'.
Consecutively, yes, but that does not necessarily mean typically one below
the other.
Now go back to school, you slippery, illiterate old fool! Who are you
trying to fool Mark Conman.
More bull **** lies trying to backtrack Mr. Slippery, on something you
posted below:
> Hey Andrew, a top-of-the-line speech app like
> Dragon NaturallySpeaking can keep up with a
> fast talker speaking at 603 wpm, like in this
> video clip.
>
> Notice the computer in the background changing
> that fast talking to text.
>
> <http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9133107326478615205&hl=en#>
In your post above, it is plain for everyone to see, you are implying that
'Dragon NaturallySpeaking can keep up with a fast talker speaking at 603
wpm', like in the video clip you posted AND THEN TRIED TO BACKTRACK WITH
YOUR FEEBLE EXPLANATION THAT YOU DID NOT MEAN THAT AFTER ALL!
What a dumb individual you are!
Another load of bullshit and lies below, from one of your old posts!
> I can easily overwhelm all 3 speech apps with rapid
> speaking, at say 288 wpm.
>
> (18 repetitions of the test sentence
> when I used "aid" in the test sentence)
>
> 18 x 16 = 288 wpm
>
> (with practice, most people, myself included, can
> dictate at 384 wpm, for 5 seconds)
> BTW, there was not even one text mistake it the
> resulting 288 words, which says a lot
> for my enunciation.
288 wpm - 384 wpm (UTTER BULLSHIT AND TOTAL LIES). PROVE IT! - You can't
because, IT IS UTTER BULLSHIT AND TOTAL LIES!
In another one of his old posts and lies below, he tries to be clever and
describes for everybody to see, what he thinks the meaning of 'Déjà vu' is.
He gets it totally wrong and I correct him as to the correct meaning of that
word.
In a follow-up post of his, he backtracks and actually has the audacity to
say he was just keeping me on my toes as if to say he knew the answer all
along but was just testing me. Another pack of LIES AND BULLSHIT. Who are
you trying to con?
>> Have you ever felt a sense of Déjà vu coming on?
>
> You poor ignorant soul, good thing you have me
> looking over your shoulder, to straighten you out.
>
> I realize you are trying to act clever, but please
> at least learn the proper way of using the French
> term you borrowed.
>
> That French term is _two_ words, it means "never seen" in
> the French language. Two words, NEVER one word, in French.
>
> It is improper usage to capitalize just one of those words
> as you did, that would be the same as writting "Never seen",
> which is just plain silly.
>
> "never seen" is proper, or even perhaps "Never Seen", if you
> want to emphasis something, but NEVER the uneducated
> alternates like "Never seen" - "never Seen" - or the
> extremely ugly "NeverSeen" that some idiots use.
That was him making a fool of himself trying to be clever.
This was my answer putting him right, which I have done many times but I
refuse to nursemaid the illiterate cretin, anymore.
> The term "Déjà Vu", does not mean "Never Seen" as you put it. Like you,
> it
> makes no sense at all when you link it to the English definition.
>
> In French, it actually means "Already Seen", so now you can see how it
> relates to the English definition. Check it out with the Oxford English
> dictionary below and stop using those Harry Potter books for research,
> they
> are making you look like a bigger idiot than you already are!
>
> http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/dejavu?view=uk
>
> Origin: French - "already seen". Dear oh dear, another fact you got
> wrong,
> one of many! How do you feel now you illiterate troll?
>
> Noun: a feeling of having already experienced the present situation.
That's just a few of your BULLSHIT LIES! To list the rest would take
another day!
I refuse to listen to any more of your BULLSHIT LIES!
YOU ARE NOW OFFICIALLY KILL FILED!
Bye loser!
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
