Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista Performance > Memory Use

Reply
 
 
Bill
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-01-2008
I have a Gigabyte KNS - Socket 939 m/b with 2x1GB of dual setup RAM
installed. OS in Vista Ultimate.

There are a further two slots available on the m/b and I have 2x512MB
matching RAM available.

Is there any advantage to installing these in a dual channel system to
increase overall RAM or does the size mismatch preclude any advantage?

Regards

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Mike Hall - MVP
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-01-2008
"Bill" <> wrote in message
news:03B798B6-0F23-4289-B2CB-...
>I have a Gigabyte KNS - Socket 939 m/b with 2x1GB of dual setup RAM
>installed. OS in Vista Ultimate.
>
> There are a further two slots available on the m/b and I have 2x512MB
> matching RAM available.
>
> Is there any advantage to installing these in a dual channel system to
> increase overall RAM or does the size mismatch preclude any advantage?
>
> Regards



Install them and find out.. the advantages of more memory outweigh the speed
advantage of dual channel..


--
Mike Hall - MVP
How to construct a good post..
http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm
How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..
http://support.microsoft.com/default...help&style=toc
Mike's Window - My Blog..
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx




 
Reply With Quote
 
Bill
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-01-2008
'Suppose it was a no brainer really.

Should have done this ages ago. Noticeable improvement with heavy graphics.

Much thanks!!

"Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message
news:OpGAL7#...
> "Bill" <> wrote in message
> news:03B798B6-0F23-4289-B2CB-...
>>I have a Gigabyte KNS - Socket 939 m/b with 2x1GB of dual setup RAM
>>installed. OS in Vista Ultimate.
>>
>> There are a further two slots available on the m/b and I have 2x512MB
>> matching RAM available.
>>
>> Is there any advantage to installing these in a dual channel system to
>> increase overall RAM or does the size mismatch preclude any advantage?
>>
>> Regards

>
>
> Install them and find out.. the advantages of more memory outweigh the
> speed advantage of dual channel..
>
>
> --
> Mike Hall - MVP
> How to construct a good post..
> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm
> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..
> http://support.microsoft.com/default...help&style=toc
> Mike's Window - My Blog..
> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx
>
>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Victek
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-01-2008
> 'Suppose it was a no brainer really.
>
> Should have done this ages ago. Noticeable improvement with heavy
> graphics.
>
> Much thanks!!
>

Since you have two of each size shouldn't the memory still be in dual
channel mode? I have 2x gig modules and 2x 512 modules and my memory is in
128 bit mode.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Bill
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-02-2008
Maybe. I have heard that mixing 512MB modules with 1GB will slow things
down becuause the size of the address blocks of data is reduced.

More interestingly, perhaps, is that my CPU meter (gadgets) shows a lot of
dual channel activity (AMD 4200 dual chip) when the computer is doing
'nothing' and there is no disk activity.

Not only that, since adding the 2x512MB the Windows Rating has dropped from
4.1 to 4.0.

What on earth is going on?

"Victek" <> wrote in message
news:8BE8CB06-1F3A-4DE6-A280-...
>> 'Suppose it was a no brainer really.
>>
>> Should have done this ages ago. Noticeable improvement with heavy
>> graphics.
>>
>> Much thanks!!
>>

> Since you have two of each size shouldn't the memory still be in dual
> channel mode? I have 2x gig modules and 2x 512 modules and my memory is
> in 128 bit mode.


 
Reply With Quote
 
skunksmash
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-02-2008

3gb (2x1gb 2x512mb) of ram can still run ''dual channel'' as long as
they are placed in the correct banks (usually defined by color)

but even if the sticks are mismatched ....3gb in ''single channel'' is
better than 2gb in ''dual channel'' for vista..

don't worry about the index score.... it should certainly be more
responsive than 2gb...?


--
skunksmash

E2180 @ 3.2ghz
arctic cooler pro 775
4GB gskill HZ @ 1050mhz
Asus P5K premium
160GB seagate 7200
coloursit 600w psu
PNY 8800GT 512mb
 
Reply With Quote
 
Victek
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-03-2008
That's interesting - I hadn't heard about the issue of smaller address
blocks before. Regarding the Vista performance rating that's a small
difference - perhaps within the test's margin of error. Have you tried
running it multiple times to see if results vary? In any case I would
consider the improvement in performance you're seeing when working with
actual applications the best test.

If you have some money to throw at it it would be interesting to see if
replacing the 2x 512 with 2x 1gb made any difference to performance or the
dual channel activity you're seeing <g>.

"Bill" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Maybe. I have heard that mixing 512MB modules with 1GB will slow things
> down becuause the size of the address blocks of data is reduced.
>
> More interestingly, perhaps, is that my CPU meter (gadgets) shows a lot of
> dual channel activity (AMD 4200 dual chip) when the computer is doing
> 'nothing' and there is no disk activity.
>
> Not only that, since adding the 2x512MB the Windows Rating has dropped
> from 4.1 to 4.0.
>
> What on earth is going on?
>
> "Victek" <> wrote in message
> news:8BE8CB06-1F3A-4DE6-A280-...
>>> 'Suppose it was a no brainer really.
>>>
>>> Should have done this ages ago. Noticeable improvement with heavy
>>> graphics.
>>>
>>> Much thanks!!
>>>

>> Since you have two of each size shouldn't the memory still be in dual
>> channel mode? I have 2x gig modules and 2x 512 modules and my memory is
>> in 128 bit mode.

>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Mike Hall - MVP
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-03-2008
"Bill" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Maybe. I have heard that mixing 512MB modules with 1GB will slow things
> down becuause the size of the address blocks of data is reduced.
>
> More interestingly, perhaps, is that my CPU meter (gadgets) shows a lot of
> dual channel activity (AMD 4200 dual chip) when the computer is doing
> 'nothing' and there is no disk activity.
>
> Not only that, since adding the 2x512MB the Windows Rating has dropped
> from 4.1 to 4.0.
>
> What on earth is going on?
>
> "Victek" <> wrote in message
> news:8BE8CB06-1F3A-4DE6-A280-...
>>> 'Suppose it was a no brainer really.
>>>
>>> Should have done this ages ago. Noticeable improvement with heavy
>>> graphics.
>>>
>>> Much thanks!!
>>>

>> Since you have two of each size shouldn't the memory still be in dual
>> channel mode? I have 2x gig modules and 2x 512 modules and my memory is
>> in 128 bit mode.

>



Bill

That's terrible. Imagine losing 0.1. You had better take out the two 512 RAM
sticks right now.


--
Mike Hall - MVP
How to construct a good post..
http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm
How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..
http://support.microsoft.com/default...help&style=toc
Mike's Window - My Blog..
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx




 
Reply With Quote
 
Bill
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-05-2008
All right Mike - I'm not loosing sleep over 0.1 - just thought it
interesting!

Still curious why my CPU multimeter shows constant high levels of activity
(40-60%) in both cores when the computer is 'at rest'?

Regards

Bill


> Bill
>
> That's terrible. Imagine losing 0.1. You had better take out the two 512
> RAM sticks right now.
>
>
> --
> Mike Hall - MVP
> How to construct a good post..
> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm
> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..
> http://support.microsoft.com/default...help&style=toc
> Mike's Window - My Blog..
> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx
>
>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Mike Hall - MVP
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-05-2008
"Bill" <> wrote in message
news:...
> All right Mike - I'm not loosing sleep over 0.1 - just thought it
> interesting!
>
> Still curious why my CPU multimeter shows constant high levels of activity
> (40-60%) in both cores when the computer is 'at rest'?
>
> Regards
>
> Bill
>
>
>> Bill
>>
>> That's terrible. Imagine losing 0.1. You had better take out the two 512
>> RAM sticks right now.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mike Hall - MVP
>> How to construct a good post..
>> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm
>> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default...help&style=toc
>> Mike's Window - My Blog..
>> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx
>>
>>
>>
>>



I had 2gb installed and registered 4.9 on the WEI scale.. bumped it up to
4gb and now it registers 4.6 on the WEI scale..

Best not to worry about the WEI. It is only there to give some idea re the
strengths of a system..


--
Mike Hall - MVP
How to construct a good post..
http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm
How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..
http://support.microsoft.com/default...help&style=toc
Mike's Window - My Blog..
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx




 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SD Memory and Memory Stick Slow and Errors Ed Windows Vista Music, Pictures and Video 0 07-07-2008 01:53 PM
Dedicated Graphical Memory & Shared System Memory Jason Windows Vista Hardware 3 05-18-2008 12:27 PM
Difference between Physical Memory and the Vista System Memory (Ra DP Windows Vista Hardware 2 02-20-2008 05:29 PM
Memory warning message with memory still available ironcito Windows Vista General Discussion 6 08-22-2007 10:49 PM
problem with memory (graphics shared memory) black2night Windows Vista General Discussion 3 03-29-2007 10:16 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59