Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista Installation > Minimum Disk Space for V. Business

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Minimum Disk Space for V. Business

 
 
St
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-08-2009
What is the bare minimum for Vista Biz system partition? For Win7, its
official requirement is "16 GB", but actually it's 5723MB. What's the
case with Vista?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Ray Luca
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-08-2009

St <sandy@localdomain> wrote:

>What is the bare minimum for Vista Biz system partition? For Win7, its
>official requirement is "16 GB", but actually it's 5723MB. What's the
>case with Vista?


A better question is what's the minimum IQ that one should have to be
allowed to operate a computer and cruise the Internet.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Rick Rogers
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-08-2009
Hi St,

A "bare minimum" figure is really pointless, as the system will rapidly
become unusable. As with other versions of Windows, that actual drive space
occupied by the OS is *not* the minimum space needed since additional space
is needed for expansion of temp files during installation and operation, as
well as for paging. How much is not defined by a set amount, but rather by
how the system is used and what programs are installed to support that use.

Vista Business recommends a minimum of 40GB drive space with at least 15GB
free space. The actual amount occupied by the system files after
installation will vary dependent on which features are installed, generally
between 5-7GB.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
Vote for my shoe: http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com

"St" <sandy@localdomain> wrote in message
news:%...
> What is the bare minimum for Vista Biz system partition? For Win7, its
> official requirement is "16 GB", but actually it's 5723MB. What's the case
> with Vista?


 
Reply With Quote
 
St
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-08-2009
On 8 августа 19:06, Rick Rogers wrote:
> Hi St,
>
> A "bare minimum" figure is really pointless, as the system will rapidly
> become unusable. As with other versions of Windows, that actual drive
> space occupied by the OS is *not* the minimum space needed since
> additional space is needed for expansion of temp files during
> installation and operation, as well as for paging. How much is not
> defined by a set amount, but rather by how the system is used and what
> programs are installed to support that use.
>
> Vista Business recommends a minimum of 40GB drive space with at least
> 15GB free space. The actual amount occupied by the system files after
> installation will vary dependent on which features are installed,
> generally between 5-7GB.
>

Thanks, Rick. Actually, it's gonna be virtual machine install to test
the single application, so long-term operationability is not required
 
Reply With Quote
 
whs
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-08-2009

St;1108479 Wrote:
> On 8 августа 19:06, Rick Rogers wrote:> > >
> > > Hi St

> >
> > > A "bare minimum" figure is really pointless, as the system wil

> > rapidl
> > > become unusable. As with other versions of Windows, that actual driv
> > > space occupied by the OS is *not* the minimum space needed sinc
> > > additional space is needed for expansion of temp files durin
> > > installation and operation, as well as for paging. How much is no
> > > defined by a set amount, but rather by how the system is used an

> > wha
> > > programs are installed to support that use

> >
> > > Vista Business recommends a minimum of 40GB drive space with at leas
> > > 15GB free space. The actual amount occupied by the system files afte
> > > installation will vary dependent on which features are installed
> > > generally between 5-7GB
> > > > >

> Thanks, Rick. Actually, it's gonna be virtual machine install to tes
> the single application, so long-term operationability is not require
> :


In a virtual partition the required space is usually dynamicall
allocated. I would define a maximum of 20GBs for the purpose

--
whs
 
Reply With Quote
 
Colin Barnhorst
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-08-2009
"whs" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
> St;1108479 Wrote:
>> On 8 авгfс,а 19:06, Rick Rogers wrote:> > >
>> > > Hi St,
>> > >
>> > > A "bare minimum" figure is really pointless, as the system will
>> > rapidly
>> > > become unusable. As with other versions of Windows, that actual drive
>> > > space occupied by the OS is *not* the minimum space needed since
>> > > additional space is needed for expansion of temp files during
>> > > installation and operation, as well as for paging. How much is not
>> > > defined by a set amount, but rather by how the system is used and
>> > what
>> > > programs are installed to support that use.
>> > >
>> > > Vista Business recommends a minimum of 40GB drive space with at least
>> > > 15GB free space. The actual amount occupied by the system files after
>> > > installation will vary dependent on which features are installed,
>> > > generally between 5-7GB.
>> > > > >

>> Thanks, Rick. Actually, it's gonna be virtual machine install to test
>> the single application, so long-term operationability is not required
>>

>
> In a virtual partition the required space is usually dynamically
> allocated. I would define a maximum of 20GBs for the purpose.
>
>
> --
> whs


With all due respect I think that 20GB is too small. I would simply use a
dynamically expanding VHD and accept the defaults VPC uses for a Vista
setup. The actual space used on the host HD should be acceptible for the
OP.

 
Reply With Quote
 
whs
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-08-2009

Colin Barnhorst;1108503 Wrote:
> "whs" <> wrote in messag
> news:...> > >
> >
> > > St;1108479 Wrote:> > > > >
> > > >> On 8 авгfс,а 19:06, Rick Rogers wrote:> >
> > > >> Thanks, Rick. Actually, it's gonna be virtual machine install t
> > > tes
> > > >> the single application, so long-term operationability is no
> > > require
> > > >> > > > >

> >
> > > In a virtual partition the required space is usually dynamicall
> > > allocated. I would define a maximum of 20GBs for the purpose

> >
> >
> > > -
> > > whs > >

>
> With all due respect I think that 20GB is too small. I would simpl
> use
> dynamically expanding VHD and accept the defaults VPC uses for
> Vist
> setup. The actual space used on the host HD should be acceptible fo
> th
> OP


Colin, for a permanent setup I would agree with you. But the OP wante
to only test one single application. It was in view of that
recommended the 20GBs. But a larger allocation cannot hurt. If it is no
needed, it will not be used anyhow

--
whs
 
Reply With Quote
 
Colin Barnhorst
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-08-2009
"whs" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
> Colin Barnhorst;1108503 Wrote:
>> "whs" <> wrote in message
>> news:...> > >
>> > >
>> > > St;1108479 Wrote:> > > > >
>> > > >> On 8 авгfс,а 19:06, Rick Rogers wrote:> > >
>> > > >> Thanks, Rick. Actually, it's gonna be virtual machine install to
>> > > test
>> > > >> the single application, so long-term operationability is not
>> > > required
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > >
>> > > In a virtual partition the required space is usually dynamically
>> > > allocated. I would define a maximum of 20GBs for the purpose.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > whs > >

>>
>> With all due respect I think that 20GB is too small. I would simply
>> use a
>> dynamically expanding VHD and accept the defaults VPC uses for a
>> Vista
>> setup. The actual space used on the host HD should be acceptible for
>> the
>> OP.

>
>
> Colin, for a permanent setup I would agree with you. But the OP wanted
> to only test one single application. It was in view of that I
> recommended the 20GBs. But a larger allocation cannot hurt. If it is not
> needed, it will not be used anyhow.
>
>
> --
> whs


Correct. The defaul vhd should be fine. When I am testing something I use
a default config just to eliminate issues relating to settings. One never
knows.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WinXP recent updates don't succeed...eats up disk space Himanshu Gohel Windows Update 5 08-02-2009 11:11 PM
Re: Mysterious Lost Disk Space Jordon Windows Server 3 06-16-2009 09:06 PM
Re: Mysterious Lost Disk Space Pegasus [MVP] Windows Server 0 06-16-2009 04:06 PM
increasing disk space Greg Windows Server 35 11-12-2007 10:05 PM
Re: W3K R2 disk quota - user directories showing incorrect free space Danny Sanders Windows Server 0 02-02-2007 04:26 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59