and why should they? vista is a crap and no one wants it..
perhaps if they learn their lesson, windows7 will be good enough to be the
real successor of XP, while vista will be considered a "freak accident"
http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1307
Will XP's 'execution stay' for emerging markets apply to other countries?
Posted by Mary Jo Foley
Speculation continues to swirl as to when and whether Microsoft will extend
the June 30, 2008, cut-off date on which many PC makers will be expected to
cease bundling Windows XP with new PCs.
But some pundits seem to have forgotten that when Microsoft initially
granted Windows XP five more months to live, back in 2007, the company left
itself a loophole. (And I don't mean just the early 2009 cut-off date it
granted white-box vendors/system builders). Late last year, Microsoft
officials said that vendors preloading Windows on PCs aimed at "emerging
markets" wouldn't have to stop selling Windows XP until 2010.
From Microsoft's September 27, 2007, press release:
"(S)ince some of the systems that ship in emerging markets don't meet the
requirements for Windows Vista, we will be extending availability of Windows
XP Starter Edition to June 30, 2010. This will allow our OEM partners who
sell PCs in emerging markets more opportunity to offer genuine Windows
licenses."
The new question that company watchers are asking this week is whether
Microsoft will extend this 2010 date to cover "low-cost" PCs - like the Asus
Eee ultra-cheap laptop - even if those PCs aren't running XP Starter
Edition.
I would expect Microsoft would find offering XP for another year-plus on
those PCs to be a lesser evil than conceding the low-cost PC market to
Linux. If these machines do not have enough processing power to run Windows
Vista (not even the Home Basic edition), what else can Microsoft expect
their manufacturers to do, other than to continue to offer the systems with
XP?
Will Microsoft extend its XP-preload cut-off date again, outside of these
fringe cases? My bet is no. Microsoft will be shooting itself in the foot if
it does this, as it would be concedinng that there are real reasons that
users and its hardware/software partners might not want its latest Windows
release (which is now over a year old, mind you)..
What's your take? Will any amount of outcry stop Microsoft from making good
on its June 30 XP preload cut-off date?