On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:51:39 -0800 (PST), Bryan Smith
<> wrote:
> My Current PC is a powered by a P4, socket 478, 3.4Ghz, Asus P4P800-E
> motherboard with 1 gig (2 x 512) PC3200 ram.
> No matter what I did, Vista seemed to want to use 60%+ of my ram.
> So, I upgraded from 1 gig (2 x 512meg sticks) to 2 gig (2 x 1gig)
> Silly Vista seem uses 50-60% at idle.
> If I had zillion gigs of ram in my box, would Vista always take 1/2 of
> it?
> Just how much ram does Vista take?
> I am just amazed just much horsepower Vista takes.
Wanting to minimize the amount of memory Windows uses is a
counterproductive desire. Vista, like previous versions of Windows, is
designed to use all, or nearly all, of your memory, all the time, and
that's good not bad. Free memory is wasted memory. You paid for it all
and shouldn't want to see any of it wasted.
Windows works hard to find a use for all the memory you have all the
time. For example if your apps don't need some of it, it will use that
part for caching, then give it back when your apps later need it. In
this way Windows keeps all your memory working for you all the time.
--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
|