Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Update > MVPs (or anybody) -- the recent "high priority" updates?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

MVPs (or anybody) -- the recent "high priority" updates?

 
 
Steve Maser
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-16-2004
This question has been posted in various forms by various people in
various newsgroups without an authoritative answer.

Can somebody step up to the plate?

Since the release of Service Pack 2 for XP in early August and turning
the "Automatic Updates" button on after restarting from the SP2
install...


There have been 3 (three) "high priority" updates in Windows Update:

1) .NET Framework 1.0 Service Pack 3

2) .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1

3) The GDI+ Detection Tool


None of these updates has "automatically installed".


Yet, they are listed as "high priority" updates in Windows Update.


Can somebody either post to say:

1) Yes, these updates have automatically installed on my machine with
Service Pack 2 installed and "automatically install" checked.

2) No -- these specific updates -- even though they are "high
priority" updates -- will *not* automatically install for the following
reason...


Yes -- these updates will *manually* install without a problem, so it's
not like Windows Update isn't "working".

Yet, I've checked with a large number of Windows Admins around Campus
here and - *to a person* - nobody has had any of these "high priority"
updates automatically install.


And we're wondering why not.

Because we're wondering if Automatic Updates is actually broken in SP2.

Which would be a "security" problem.


Thanks!

- Steve
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
SF Dave
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-16-2004
I've witnessed same behavior in a Win 2K environment. Am sure MS is on top of
this as we speak.

Right?

- d

"Steve Maser" wrote:

<snip>
>
> 3) The GDI+ Detection Tool
>
>
> None of these updates has "automatically installed".
>


<snip>
 
Reply With Quote
 
Phillip Windell
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-17-2004
On our servers it specifically stated after the reboot that the patches were
not applied because there nothing installed on the machines that would have
caused the patches to be required.

So, they don't install on machine that have no component for them to
actually patch. That what the pop up message indicated.

--

Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com


"SF Dave" <SF > wrote in message
news:C44814E4-7E19-47CC-B058-...
> I've witnessed same behavior in a Win 2K environment. Am sure MS is on top

of
> this as we speak.
>
> Right?
>
> - d
>
> "Steve Maser" wrote:
>
> <snip>
> >
> > 3) The GDI+ Detection Tool
> >
> >
> > None of these updates has "automatically installed".
> >

>
> <snip>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Steve Maser
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-17-2004
In article <>, Phillip Windell
<@.> wrote:

> On our servers it specifically stated after the reboot that the patches were
> not applied because there nothing installed on the machines that would have
> caused the patches to be required.
>
> So, they don't install on machine that have no component for them to
> actually patch. That what the pop up message indicated.\



OK, then.

But what about the two .NET updates?

Shouldn't these have been "automatically installed" if we had installed
*all* Windows Updates (including all "optional updates") *prior* to SP2
installation in August?


Or is it just a weird/confusing conicidence that there have been 3
"high priority" updates released that would *intentionally not* be
"automatically installed" on an SP2 computer?


I can understand the GDI+ thing -- it's doesn't directly affect SP2.

But the .NET stuff -- if you have it installed -- isn't that a "high
priority" patch that *should* be automatically installed?



Or is the question one that *all three* of these updates should *not*
have been in the "high priority" section of W.U., but, rather in the
"optional" section and MS is just making this series of patches
confusing?


That's what nobody here at U of M seems to get and we can't find any
documentation relating to this.

- Steve
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can you restore a file that is listed in "Recent items" when its usb has broken seebyher Windows Vista General Discussion 4 02-13-2009 10:44 AM
Re: Can you restore a file that is listed in "Recent items" when its usb has broken seebyher Windows Vista General Discussion 0 02-12-2009 08:42 AM
HELP! need help on removing "recent __" in the "searches" folder SNOWBOMB7 Windows Vista General Discussion 22 04-10-2007 04:40 PM
HELP! need help on removing "recent __" in the "searches" folder SNOWBOMB7 Windows Vista General Discussion 1 04-06-2007 07:27 AM
Post-SP2 "high priority updates" -- why no automatic install? Steve Maser Windows Update 1 09-10-2004 12:04 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59