On Oct 16, 12:41*pm, "Mr. Arnold" <Arn...@Arnold.com> wrote:
> c wrote:
> > On Oct 16, 10:54 am, "Mr. Arnold" <Arn...@Arnold.com> wrote:
> >> c wrote:
> >>> Trying to move C:\users\joe\Documents\bsfolder to C:\users\joe, but
> >>> Vista complains that I need administrator privileges to do it.
> >>> Control panel -> user accounts SHOWS that me, user joe, does have
> >>> Administrator privileges. I'm logged in as joe.
> >> No, you're not user/admin with full admin rights with that out of the
> >> box user/admin account that Vista gives you.
>
> >>> Long ago I disabled UAC.
> >> Well with UAC enabled you should have been able to escalate rights to be
> >> a admin with full rights. But you disabled UAC.
>
> >>> Why must this be so damned difficult?
> >> <http://www.computerperformance.co.uk/vista/vista_administrator_activa....)>
>
> >> <http://www.nirmaltv.com/2008/07/11/how-to-take-ownership-of-files-and....>
>
> > thanks mr. A.
>
> > So, essentially Vista is lying. Administrator isn't really that. We
> > could all avoid lots of confusion had they picked something else to
> > describe "enhanced permissions but not Administrator ones".
>
> No, those user/admin accounts can escalate to user/admin that have full
> rights, but that requires UAC to be enabled to escalate to admin with
> Full rights. The do not inherit full admin rights from the built-in
> hidden Administrator account, like on XP. That link that's being talked
> about on vista_administrator.
>
> <http://news.softpedia.com/news/Admin-Approval-Mode-in-Windows-Vista-4...>
>
> "In this mode (which is on by default for all members of the local
> administrators group), every user with administrator privileges runs
> normally as a standard user; but when an application or the system needs
> to do something that requires administrator permissions, the user is
> prompted to approve the task explicitly. Unlike the "super user on"
> function from UNIX that leaves the process elevated until the user
> explicitly turns it off, admin approval mode enables administrator
> privileges for just the task that was approved, automatically returning
> the user to standard user when the task is completed," explained Jim
> Allchin, Microsoft Co-President, Platform and Services Division.
>
>
>
> > Checked that my user, joe, is owner of both SRC and Destination
> > folder, so why is it still complaining?
>
> Well, in this case, you're just *user* joe, and you're not user/admin joe..
>
> I suggest you go back and read the two links up above there about the
> example in taking ownership, because joe is part of the Administrators
> group. But just plain old *user* joe is not an administrator.
>
> You know, you're really doing yourself a disservice by turning UAC off,
> because you are on the Internet wide open to attack, just like you were
> on XP, as that O/S gets hammered by malware with a user running with
> full admin rights on the Internet.
I read the taking ownership link and now understand it.
So checking C:\Users\joe, owner was system. I change to joe.
Checked C:\Users\joe\Documents\bsfolder and it already has joe as
owner.
Tried again and still same issue.
Let's back up here though. Why would Vista restrict the user joe from
doing ANYTHING under C:\Users\joe? Seems like I should be able to move
folders under here to my heart's content!
thanks.
c
|