Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Server > File Systems > NAMESPACE servers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

NAMESPACE servers

 
 
IT Staff
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-26-2009
windows 2003 standard edition r2, using domain namespace only

I've 3 DFS server runnning in country A, B, C

1. Should i create a domain namespace in a *separate* servers or i can pick
any countries's server to host domain namespace ?

2. For high availability of domain namespace, should 2 servers be on the
same AD site or namespace servers in different AD site ? ie country A server
hosting a namespace, country B server hosting the same domain namespace ?



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Anthony [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-26-2009
IT Staff,
Just as general guidance, you might not need very many namespaces in the
organization If you think of it as a logical arrangement of data instead of
physical, then you could have just one namespace for "Shared", and
everything shared would be below that. Of course you can choose to fragment
it into many namespaces, but people will then have several different trees
to navigate.
Only you will be able to answer the question about resilience. How do you go
about creating resilience now for services, like your mail server? It
depends on the layout of your infrastructure,
Anthony
http://www.airdesk.com



"IT Staff" <> wrote in message
news:#W$...
> windows 2003 standard edition r2, using domain namespace only
>
> I've 3 DFS server runnning in country A, B, C
>
> 1. Should i create a domain namespace in a *separate* servers or i can
> pick any countries's server to host domain namespace ?
>
> 2. For high availability of domain namespace, should 2 servers be on the
> same AD site or namespace servers in different AD site ? ie country A
> server hosting a namespace, country B server hosting the same domain
> namespace ?
>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
IT Staff
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-27-2009
i wish to create namespace servers for high availability.

Must the namespace servers be 2003 enterprise r2 ? I read the help file that
2003 standard r2 only support ONE namespace server.


"Anthony [MVP]" <> wrote in message
news:623381F3-9375-4B2D-9C9D-...
> IT Staff,
> Just as general guidance, you might not need very many namespaces in the
> organization If you think of it as a logical arrangement of data instead
> of physical, then you could have just one namespace for "Shared", and
> everything shared would be below that. Of course you can choose to
> fragment it into many namespaces, but people will then have several
> different trees to navigate.
> Only you will be able to answer the question about resilience. How do you
> go about creating resilience now for services, like your mail server? It
> depends on the layout of your infrastructure,
> Anthony
> http://www.airdesk.com
>
>
>
> "IT Staff" <> wrote in message
> news:#W$...
>> windows 2003 standard edition r2, using domain namespace only
>>
>> I've 3 DFS server runnning in country A, B, C
>>
>> 1. Should i create a domain namespace in a *separate* servers or i can
>> pick any countries's server to host domain namespace ?
>>
>> 2. For high availability of domain namespace, should 2 servers be on the
>> same AD site or namespace servers in different AD site ? ie country A
>> server hosting a namespace, country B server hosting the same domain
>> namespace ?
>>
>>
>>



 
Reply With Quote
 
DaveMills
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-27-2009
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:36:43 +0800, "IT Staff" <> wrote:

>i wish to create namespace servers for high availability.

This is not the same as multiple name spaces. You can have Domain\DFSRoot\Asia,
Domain\DFSRoot\Europe etc.

>
>Must the namespace servers be 2003 enterprise r2 ? I read the help file that
>2003 standard r2 only support ONE namespace server.

Heck, YOU posted the answer to this less than a day earlier.



>
>
>"Anthony [MVP]" <> wrote in message
>news:623381F3-9375-4B2D-9C9D-...
>> IT Staff,
>> Just as general guidance, you might not need very many namespaces in the
>> organization If you think of it as a logical arrangement of data instead
>> of physical, then you could have just one namespace for "Shared", and
>> everything shared would be below that. Of course you can choose to
>> fragment it into many namespaces, but people will then have several
>> different trees to navigate.
>> Only you will be able to answer the question about resilience. How do you
>> go about creating resilience now for services, like your mail server? It
>> depends on the layout of your infrastructure,
>> Anthony
>> http://www.airdesk.com
>>
>>
>>
>> "IT Staff" <> wrote in message
>> news:#W$...
>>> windows 2003 standard edition r2, using domain namespace only
>>>
>>> I've 3 DFS server runnning in country A, B, C
>>>
>>> 1. Should i create a domain namespace in a *separate* servers or i can
>>> pick any countries's server to host domain namespace ?
>>>
>>> 2. For high availability of domain namespace, should 2 servers be on the
>>> same AD site or namespace servers in different AD site ? ie country A
>>> server hosting a namespace, country B server hosting the same domain
>>> namespace ?
>>>
>>>
>>>

>

--
Dave Mills
There are 10 types of people, those that understand binary and those that don't.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Adding additional namespace servers... Adam File Systems 10 09-21-2008 06:42 AM
Namespace Servers JK File Systems 2 01-30-2008 03:22 PM
Namespace servers in R2 J Ford File Systems 5 12-07-2007 01:25 AM
DNS and Namespace Servers Nordic File Systems 4 08-28-2006 04:56 PM
How many namespace servers? PoBoy File Systems 1 07-25-2006 01:17 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59