Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Update > .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1...(KB963707) faliure.

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

.NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1...(KB963707) faliure.

 
 
The Rook
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-25-2009

Basically this failed to to download. I tried to download it again but it
said I have all the updates I need. Yet my 'update history' says it failed.
The Error Code is : 0x80070BC2. I found the update in my Temp folder (please
don't ask my how or why). I use Firefox if that's any help. Is there anyone
who can help me please?

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Robert Aldwinckle
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-25-2009


"The Rook" <The > wrote in message news:15BE96B2-4480-45F8-94C4-...
> Basically this failed to to download. I tried to download it again but it
> said I have all the updates I need. Yet my 'update history' says it failed.
> The Error Code is : 0x80070BC2.



<cmd_output OS="XPsp3">
E:\>set /a c = 0xbc2
3010
E:\>net helpmsg %c%

The requested operation is successful. Changes will not be effective until the system is rebooted.
</cmd_output>


That doesn't look like an "error" code to me. Are you rebooting?
What other symptoms are you getting--after the reboot? ; )


> I found the update in my Temp folder (please
> don't ask my how or why). I use Firefox if that's any help. Is there anyone
> who can help me please?
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
The Rook
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-26-2009



"Robert Aldwinckle" wrote:

>
> "The Rook" <The > wrote in message news:15BE96B2-4480-45F8-94C4-...
> > Basically this failed to to download. I tried to download it again but it
> > said I have all the updates I need. Yet my 'update history' says it failed.
> > The Error Code is : 0x80070BC2.

>
>
> <cmd_output OS="XPsp3">
> E:\>set /a c = 0xbc2
> 3010
> E:\>net helpmsg %c%
>
> The requested operation is successful. Changes will not be effective until the system is rebooted.
> </cmd_output>
>
>
> That doesn't look like an "error" code to me. Are you rebooting?
> What other symptoms are you getting--after the reboot? ; )
>
>
> > I found the update in my Temp folder (please
> > don't ask my how or why). I use Firefox if that's any help. Is there anyone
> > who can help me please?
> >

I've opened the file and it says this:

"Installation Log
Message Types: Errors Verbose Messages
Message Details: Date Time Function Names

> Returning IDNO. INSTALLMESSAGE_USER [You must restart your system for the configuration changes made to Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 to take effect. Click Yes to restart now or No if you plan to manually restart later.]

[6/24/2009, 9:7:54] (HotIron::MspInstallerT<class ATL::CPathT<class
ATL::CStringT<unsigned short,class ATL::StrTraitATL<unsigned short,class
ATL::ChTraitsCRT<unsigned short> > > > >::PerformMsiOperation) Patch
(NDP35SP1-KB963707.msp) install succeeded on product (Microsoft .NET
Framework 3.5 SP1) and requires reboot. Msi Log: Microsoft .NET Framework
3.5-KB963707_20090624_090732640-Msi0.txt
[6/24/2009, 9:7:54] (HotIron::MspInstallerT<class ATL::CPathT<class
ATL::CStringT<unsigned short,class ATL::StrTraitATL<unsigned short,class
ATL::ChTraitsCRT<unsigned short> > > > >::PerformMsiOperation)
MsiApplyMultiplePatches returned 0xBC2: ERROR_SUCCESS_REBOOT_REQUIRED
[6/24/2009, 9:7:54] Action complete. Log File:
C:\DOCUME~1\SIMON\LOCALS~1\Temp\Microsoft .NET Framework
3.5-KB963707_20090624_090732640-Msi0.txt
[6/24/2009, 9:7:54] (HotIron::MspInstallerT<class ATL::CPathT<class
ATL::CStringT<unsigned short,class ATL::StrTraitATL<unsigned short,class
ATL::ChTraitsCRT<unsigned short> > > > >::PerformMsiOperation) exiting
function/method
[6/24/2009, 9:7:54] (HotIron::MspInstallerT<class ATL::CPathT<class
ATL::CStringT<unsigned short,class ATL::StrTraitATL<unsigned short,class
ATL::ChTraitsCRT<unsigned short> > > > >::PerformMsiOperation) succeeded but
needs reboot
[6/24/2009, 9:7:54] (HotIron::CBaseMspInstaller::Install)
PerformMsiOperation returned 0xBC2
[6/24/2009, 9:7:54] (HotIron::CBaseMspInstaller::Install) exiting
function/method
[6/24/2009, 9:7:54] (HotIron::CBaseMspInstaller::Install)
PerformMsiOperation returned 0xBC2
[6/24/2009, 9:7:54] (HotIron::CompositeInstaller::Install) Composite
Installer is reporting 0x80070BC2 - The requested operation is successful.
Changes will not be effective until the system is rebooted.
[6/24/2009, 9:7:54] (HotIron::CompositeInstaller::Install) exiting
function/method
[6/24/2009, 9:7:54] (HotIron::CompositeInstaller::Install) The requested
operation is successful. Changes will not be effective until the system is
rebooted.
[6/24/2009, 9:7:54] (HotIron::Main::Run) Final Result: Installation
completed successfully"

I know it says "click yes to restart" but it doesn't give me anything to
click on to restart! However, I have just looked in my "Add or Remove" folder
and it says that (KB963707) is currently installed. So I presume that
everything is OK? If that is so, would it be OK to empty my temp folder of
this (KB963707)?
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Robert Aldwinckle
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-26-2009


"The Rook" <> wrote in message news:7EEAB213-0386-49F5-8790-...
>
>
> "Robert Aldwinckle" wrote:



>> What other symptoms are you getting--after the reboot? ; )



> I've opened the file and it says this:
>


> I know it says "click yes to restart" but it doesn't give me anything to
> click on to restart!


> However, I have just looked in my "Add or Remove" folder
> and it says that (KB963707) is currently installed.


> So I presume that everything is OK?



Not until you do a reboot--the old version of some module(s) is still being used.


> If that is so, would it be OK to empty my temp folder of
> this (KB963707)?



After the reboot and after you have confirmed that the new version
of the modules are in place, if you want.


Good luck

Robert
---


 
Reply With Quote
 
The Rook
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-26-2009



"Robert Aldwinckle" wrote:

>
> "The Rook" <> wrote in message news:7EEAB213-0386-49F5-8790-...
> >
> >
> > "Robert Aldwinckle" wrote:

>
>
> >> What other symptoms are you getting--after the reboot? ; )

>
>
> > I've opened the file and it says this:
> >

>
> > I know it says "click yes to restart" but it doesn't give me anything to
> > click on to restart!

>
> > However, I have just looked in my "Add or Remove" folder
> > and it says that (KB963707) is currently installed.

>
> > So I presume that everything is OK?

>
>
> Not until you do a reboot--the old version of some module(s) is still being used.
>
>
> > If that is so, would it be OK to empty my temp folder of
> > this (KB963707)?

>
>
> After the reboot and after you have confirmed that the new version
> of the modules are in place, if you want.
>
>
> Good luck
>
> Robert


Okay, I have rebooted, what do I need to do to confirm that the new modules
are in place?

It says that the program is currently installed on my 'Add or Remove
Programs'. Do you think I'm set then?

Thank you for your time BTW.
> ---
>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Robert Aldwinckle
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-27-2009


"The Rook" <> wrote in message news:B36BAB6A-1E8E-4E9C-843E-...
>
>
> "Robert Aldwinckle" wrote:
>
>>
>> "The Rook" <> wrote in message news:7EEAB213-0386-49F5-8790-...
>> >
>> >
>> > "Robert Aldwinckle" wrote:

>>
>>
>> >> What other symptoms are you getting--after the reboot? ; )

>>
>>
>> > I've opened the file and it says this:
>> >

>>
>> > I know it says "click yes to restart" but it doesn't give me anything to
>> > click on to restart!

>>
>> > However, I have just looked in my "Add or Remove" folder
>> > and it says that (KB963707) is currently installed.

>>
>> > So I presume that everything is OK?

>>
>>
>> Not until you do a reboot--the old version of some module(s) is still being used.
>>
>>
>> > If that is so, would it be OK to empty my temp folder of
>> > this (KB963707)?

>>
>>
>> After the reboot and after you have confirmed that the new version
>> of the modules are in place, if you want.
>>
>>
>> Good luck
>>
>> Robert

>


> Okay, I have rebooted, what do I need to do to confirm that the new modules
> are in place?



It depends on the implementation of the fix. You can get clues from
the associated KB article and TechNet Security Bulletin (if available)
or from the update's install log.

Oh. KB963707? AU hasn't shown it to me yet. Looks like it is just
an optional hotfix somehow (mis?)categorized as high priority.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/963707

Frankly I don't know why it would think that I would need it because I have
never had FireFox installed let alone its ".NET Framework Assistant 1.0"
and this is only a single user machine. So I won't be able to help you
by referring to my logs for this update. Then the only clues you will have
is from your install logs.


>
> It says that the program is currently installed on my 'Add or Remove
> Programs'. Do you think I'm set then?



Probably. A test would be whether it is still offered to you via either WU/AU.


>
> Thank you for your time BTW.



You're welcome.


Good luck

Robert
---


 
Reply With Quote
 
Harry Johnston [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-27-2009

Robert Aldwinckle wrote:

> Oh. KB963707? AU hasn't shown it to me yet. Looks like it is just
> an optional hotfix somehow (mis?)categorized as high priority.
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/963707
>
> Frankly I don't know why it would think that I would need it because I have
> never had FireFox installed let alone its ".NET Framework Assistant 1.0"
> and this is only a single user machine.


The Firefox .NET Framework Assistant is part of .NET 3.5, and is installed
regardless of whether Firefox is present or not ... at least, the original
version was. The behaviour of the updated version hasn't been well documented.

Harry.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Robert Aldwinckle
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-28-2009


"Harry Johnston [MVP]" <> wrote in message news:...
> Robert Aldwinckle wrote:
>
>> Oh. KB963707? AU hasn't shown it to me yet. Looks like it is just
>> an optional hotfix somehow (mis?)categorized as high priority.
>>
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/963707
>>
>> Frankly I don't know why it would think that I would need it because I have
>> never had FireFox installed let alone its ".NET Framework Assistant 1.0"
>> and this is only a single user machine.

>


> The Firefox .NET Framework Assistant is part of .NET 3.5, and is installed
> regardless of whether Firefox is present or not ... at least, the original
> version was. The behaviour of the updated version hasn't been well documented.



My AU still hasn't seen it. MU only. Same thing with the other Office
related update that's supposedly high priority.

Meanwhile wuredir is *still* PerUpdate regulated. ; \


Robert
---


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 and .NET Framework 3.5 Drakoguard Windows Update 8 02-05-2010 08:51 PM
Update to .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 for the .NET Framework Assistant 1.0 x86 (KB963707) t-4-2 Windows Update 18 07-11-2009 09:24 AM
Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 and .NET Framework 3.5 charles Windows Update 1 04-20-2009 02:09 PM
Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 and .NET Framework 3.5 Family Update (KB951847) x64 Installation problem BP Windows Update 8 03-16-2009 01:59 AM
can't install .net framework 1.0 service pack 3 or framework 1.1 sp 1 Bryan Windows Update 6 12-21-2004 06:53 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59