netsh trace with report=yes

Hello,

I tried on W7 and WS08R2 a usual trace for a html output file. All
documents are telling me its just the parameter report=yes. But I don't
get this stupid html file. I will get the cab and the etl file but never
the html file. I tried on standalone machines and on domain machines,
fresh installed machines and some vonfigured machines. Does anyone know
another parameter for this type of output file?

Thanks

Detlef

Hi Detlef,

you need to use the convert syntax to transfer the etl file in a a.e. html
format.
hope that helps otherwise post your complete command string :

Syntax
convert input= Tracefilename.etl [[output=]FileName]
[[dump=]{csv|xml|evtx|txt|no}]

Report
Optional. Specifies whether to generate an HTML report. If unspecified, the
parameter defaults to "no."
->
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...raceUsingTrace

Regards
Ramazan

"Detlef Knut" <> wrote in message
news:#$...
> Hello,
>
> I tried on W7 and WS08R2 a usual trace for a html output file. All
> documents are telling me its just the parameter report=yes. But I don't
> get this stupid html file. I will get the cab and the etl file but never
> the html file. I tried on standalone machines and on domain machines,
> fresh installed machines and some vonfigured machines. Does anyone know
> another parameter for this type of output file?
>
> Thanks
>
> Detlef

Hi Ramazan,

thanks. But this will not do what I wanted to do. I figured out that the
documentation for this command is totally wrong on technet. What there
is written as standard will never work the way like it is said. You can
try it.

Regrads
Detlef

Am 23.04.2010 22:20, schrieb RCan:
> Hi Detlef,
>
> you need to use the convert syntax to transfer the etl file in a a.e.
> html format.
> hope that helps otherwise post your complete command string :
>
> Syntax
> convert input= Tracefilename.etl [[output=]FileName]
> [[dump=]{csv|xml|evtx|txt|no}]
>
> Report
> Optional. Specifies whether to generate an HTML report. If unspecified,
> the parameter defaults to "no."
> ->
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...raceUsingTrace
>
>
> Regards
> Ramazan
>
> "Detlef Knut" <> wrote in message
> news:#$...
>> Hello,
>>
>> I tried on W7 and WS08R2 a usual trace for a html output file. All
>> documents are telling me its just the parameter report=yes. But I
>> don't get this stupid html file. I will get the cab and the etl file
>> but never the html file. I tried on standalone machines and on domain
>> machines, fresh installed machines and some vonfigured machines. Does
>> anyone know another parameter for this type of output file?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Detlef
>

Hi Deftlef,

ok - I had already used the netsh trace command and it works fine, what
command switches does not work for you ?
Can you please post the complete command string and an short explanation
what you want to do exactly ?

Regards
Ramazan

"Detlef Knut" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Hi Ramazan,
>
> thanks. But this will not do what I wanted to do. I figured out that the
> documentation for this command is totally wrong on technet. What there is
> written as standard will never work the way like it is said. You can try
> it.
>
> Regrads
> Detlef
>
> Am 23.04.2010 22:20, schrieb RCan:
>> Hi Detlef,
>>
>> you need to use the convert syntax to transfer the etl file in a a.e.
>> html format.
>> hope that helps otherwise post your complete command string :
>>
>> Syntax
>> convert input= Tracefilename.etl [[output=]FileName]
>> [[dump=]{csv|xml|evtx|txt|no}]
>>
>> Report
>> Optional. Specifies whether to generate an HTML report. If unspecified,
>> the parameter defaults to "no."
>> ->
>> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...raceUsingTrace
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Ramazan
>>
>> "Detlef Knut" <> wrote in message
>> news:#$...
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I tried on W7 and WS08R2 a usual trace for a html output file. All
>>> documents are telling me its just the parameter report=yes. But I
>>> don't get this stupid html file. I will get the cab and the etl file
>>> but never the html file. I tried on standalone machines and on domain
>>> machines, fresh installed machines and some vonfigured machines. Does
>>> anyone know another parameter for this type of output file?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Detlef
>>
>