The workgroup name is a bit of an anomaly, on older systems at least it only
affects what you see displayed and not necessarily what you can access. In
any case MS Networking seems to have it's issues - add some wireless and
between MS and Cisco (Linksys)things only get worse
My usual recourse is to set up one admin and password that's common to all
machines and then sign on with that. It seems like once you can get the
things to communicate for the first time it is easier to step back from
there with permissions etc. Just giving everyone permission to do everything
does not seem to kick in. This is bad security of course but my experience
is that no network setup ever goes as expected
Charlie
"IrvD" <> wrote in message
news:93ECEA56-22EC-4174-BD77-...
> Thanks, I do have all on the same network - I have changed the Vista
> Machines
> to the name of my home network. I have worked some of the issues by
> turning
> off the Vista machines requiring a pass word to access. I am now able to
> get
> into all but one machine running XP Pro SP2. I have gone from the XP Pro
> Machine into the Vistas but as of now it is just one way. Still not giving
> up.
>
> "Fire" wrote:
>
>> In order for me to get my mix of XP and Vista computers to see each
>> other I
>> had to go into the network settings and change the group name from MShome
>> to
>> WORKGROUP. That is what the Vista was already named. I couldn't change
>> that
>> computers group name, but I had to change the other 3's XP networking
>> group
>> name to match the Vista machines workgroup name. Only way I could get
>> them
>> to connect and be visible to each other.
>>
>> "IrvD" wrote:
>>
>> > Using a mix of computers: Vista Business; Premium; XP Pro; Media
>> > Center; &
>> > Home - Issue not all computers see one another and access does not go
>> > between
>> > Vista and XP - I read most of the post and did not see reference
>> > items. I
>> > am on a home secured network. Looking to share resources and have
>> > turned all
>> > the sharing that I could find on. I also ensured that at least one
>> > folder
>> > and printer was shared on each resource. All advice is appreciated.