Newsgroup info about windows 7

Newsgroup info about windows 7

There is a problem with the alt.windows7.general newgroups. I
don't think it is named correctly. That is why some news severs are
not caring this. I think.

Greg

Here is my new server response.

> alt.windows7.general

the idea is that there's discussion in alt.config, a proper newsgroup
charter is written, there's agreement on the actual name (alt.config
discussed alt.os.windows-7 last week), and someone sends a control
message. This is necessary to ensure adequate interest and agreement.

Until then, please use one of the general / .misc groups!

Greg <> wrote:

>the idea is that there's discussion in alt.config, a proper newsgroup
>charter is written, there's agreement on the actual name (alt.config
>discussed alt.os.windows-7 last week), and someone sends a control
>message. This is necessary to ensure adequate interest and agreement.

!! I thought that one BIG reason for the existence of alt.* was to get
away from exactly this kind of process in the Big8 hierarchies.
Admittedly, this is something that I'm not at all in touch with. Has
alt.* split into anarchic and regulated parts?

--
Tim Slattery

http://members.cox.net/slatteryt

Forums are listed here:
http://social.answers.microsoft.com/...-US/categories

--
Disclaimer: The information has been posted "as is" with no warranties or
guarantees and doesn''t give any rights.



"Greg" wrote:

> Newsgroup info about windows 7
>
> There is a problem with the alt.windows7.general newgroups. I
> don't think it is named correctly. That is why some news severs are
> not caring this. I think.
>
> Greg
>
> Here is my new server response.
>
> > alt.windows7.general
>
> the idea is that there's discussion in alt.config, a proper newsgroup
> charter is written, there's agreement on the actual name (alt.config
> discussed alt.os.windows-7 last week), and someone sends a control
> message. This is necessary to ensure adequate interest and agreement.
>
> Until then, please use one of the general / .misc groups!
>
> .
>

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:15:31 -0700, "Alex Clayton"
<> wrote:

>"Greg" <> wrote in message
>news:...
>> Newsgroup info about windows 7
>>
>> There is a problem with the alt.windows7.general newgroups. I
>> don't think it is named correctly. That is why some news severs are
>> not caring this. I think.
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> Here is my new server response.
>>
>>> alt.windows7.general
>>
>> the idea is that there's discussion in alt.config, a proper newsgroup
>> charter is written, there's agreement on the actual name (alt.config
>> discussed alt.os.windows-7 last week), and someone sends a control
>> message. This is necessary to ensure adequate interest and agreement.
>>
>> Until then, please use one of the general / .misc groups!
>>
>>
>

>If you either learn how to write, or have someone who has, try it for you,
>you may find it works better.

What is wrong with my grammar? It is fine. I just pasted what my
news server told me. I just missed one letter bfd. It was an "s"
if anyone can't figure it out. The rest of the post is not my
grammar, but is my news server response to my question. Which is
understandable. I am in the U.S. they are in Germany.



Greg

"Greg" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:15:31 -0700, "Alex Clayton"
> <> wrote:
>
>>"Greg" <> wrote in message
>>news:...
>>> Newsgroup info about windows 7
>>>
>>> There is a problem with the alt.windows7.general newgroups. I
>>> don't think it is named correctly. That is why some news severs are
>>> not caring this. I think.
>>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>>> Here is my new server response.
>>>
>>>> alt.windows7.general
>>>
>>> the idea is that there's discussion in alt.config, a proper newsgroup
>>> charter is written, there's agreement on the actual name (alt.config
>>> discussed alt.os.windows-7 last week), and someone sends a control
>>> message. This is necessary to ensure adequate interest and agreement.
>>>
>>> Until then, please use one of the general / .misc groups!
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>>If you either learn how to write, or have someone who has, try it for you,
>>you may find it works better.
>
> What is wrong with my grammar? It is fine. I just pasted what my
> news server told me. I just missed one letter bfd. It was an "s"
> if anyone can't figure it out. The rest of the post is not my
> grammar, but is my news server response to my question. Which is
> understandable. I am in the U.S. they are in Germany.
>
>
>
> Greg

To be absolutely pedantic, you misspelled "carrying"....... ;-)

"Gordon" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
> "Greg" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:15:31 -0700, "Alex Clayton"
>> <> wrote:
>>
>>>"Greg" <> wrote in message
>>>news:...
>>>> Newsgroup info about windows 7
>>>>
>>>> There is a problem with the alt.windows7.general newgroups. I
>>>> don't think it is named correctly. That is why some news severs are
>>>> not caring this. I think.
>>>>
>>>> Greg
>>>>
>>>> Here is my new server response.
>>>>
>>>>> alt.windows7.general
>>>>
>>>> the idea is that there's discussion in alt.config, a proper newsgroup
>>>> charter is written, there's agreement on the actual name (alt.config
>>>> discussed alt.os.windows-7 last week), and someone sends a control
>>>> message. This is necessary to ensure adequate interest and agreement.
>>>>
>>>> Until then, please use one of the general / .misc groups!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>>If you either learn how to write, or have someone who has, try it for
>>>you,
>>>you may find it works better.
>>
>> What is wrong with my grammar? It is fine. I just pasted what my
>> news server told me. I just missed one letter bfd. It was an "s"
>> if anyone can't figure it out. The rest of the post is not my
>> grammar, but is my news server response to my question. Which is
>> understandable. I am in the U.S. they are in Germany.
>>
>>
>>
>> Greg
>
> To be absolutely pedantic, you misspelled "carrying"....... ;-)
.. . .and that should probably be "news servers," not "news severs." ;o)

"Opinicus" <> wrote in message
news:_ ...
> Refreshing and checking my newsgroup list I see that there is a
> "microsoft.public.it.windows7" group. Huh? Whatever did the Italians do to
> get a Win7 group on on the microsoft.public server?
>

They haven't. It's gone.