"Frank" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> ray wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 17:56:01 -0700, jgoering wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Can anyone assure me that Vista gets better? For the last two days I
>>>have not been able to install AIM, Itunes Real Player, or just about
>>>anything else. Itunes & Realplayer download, then either disapper and
>>>won't install, or I just get error messages. AIM takes half an hour to
>>>install then wont open. Im truly on the verge of taking the computer
>>>back to the store and getting the old one out and using XP again!
>>
>>
>> Most competent consultants have advised their clients to wait for at
>> least
>> SP1.
>>
>
> No, that's really not true at all.
> Only the incompetent consultants are advising their clients not to upgrade
> to Vista until SP1 comes out. That will allow them (the incompetent
> consultants) to try and learn the ins and outs of Vista so they don't look
> like the fools they really are when their clients do upgrade to Vista.
>
> On the other hand, the really competent consultants, the ones who know
> what they're doing, are advising their clients to upgrade to Vista if they
> desire to because, (the competent consultants) know Vista and they know
> what they're doing.
> That's the real truth!
> Frank
It's not as simple as that. It depends on how big the network is. Is active
directory involved? Are there any 'nix or Novell servers on the network? Are
there any incompatible LOB applications? Are their computers and other
hardware Vista compatible? Do they have remote users? There is no black and
white, yes or no, answer when it comes to upgrading anything in a business
situation. I like to think I'm reasonably competent. I've been using Vista
every day for well over a year and over eight months exclusively on my
Windows computers. I'm pretty sure I know Vista better than most people. I
administer several networks on contract ranging in size from a couple of
PC's to over a hundred. I haven't recommended any of my business clients
upgrade to Vista yet. Even when buying new computers I'm still recommending
XP for them. Once some key personnel are interested I'll recommend they try
Vista at home first for a month or so then at work. Once they're comfortable
and can help other users on their network I "may" recommend Vista but it
will be all or nothing at that point. It costs a business too much to
support two OS' in most cases. It's also much cheaper to train employees if
they have the same OS at home as at work. It's not that I don't think Vista
isn't ready for business use. It's the other way around. Most businesses are
not ready for Vista.
--
Kerry Brown
Microsoft MVP - Shell/User
http://www.vistahelp.ca