Thank you Fr@nk and Jupiter... I'm very interested to read this.
I've never felt happy about the auto function, preferring in most cases (ie
not just Windows) to know the what/when of what's happening with my computer.
Eccentric? Heck NO! Just paranoid. LOL
Now, what you're saying suggests to me that as often as not, I stand a good
chance of completing an update 'as soon as' or even sooner if I do it
manually. I like that!
Be kind to your mother today...
"Jupiter Jones [MVP]" wrote:
> Part of the reason is to stagger the downloads so the available bandwidth is
> not exceeded.
> Similar to if the "Automatic" option is selected.
> The computer will not get the updates immediately, but may get them days
> later as bandwidth allows.
>
> If you want the updates now, you can go to Windows/Microsoft Update and get
> them now.
>
> --
> Jupiter Jones [MVP]
> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
> http://www.dts-l.org
>
>
> "Fr@nk" <0Tnet> wrote in message
> news:L_o9g.63581$5Z.55991@dukeread02...
> >
> >>"Maurice N ~ MVP" <> wrote in message
> >>news:%.. .
> >>What you describe has happened to me as well. It's to be expected.
> >>
> >>Should it allow download if you ask for it? Ideally yes, but again, with
> >>setting at Notify only, don't expect it to fetch.
> >>
> >>--
> >>Maurice N
> >>MS-MVP Windows (Shell / User), Aumha.net VSOP , DTS-L
> >>-----
> >
> >
> > Maurice-
> >
> >
> > Wow, thanks for the _quick_ reply! But I disagree: and if you read my post
> > carefully, you'll see it's not supposed to work like this. There's a
> > DOWNLOAD button. If you click it, the download should start. I agree if I
> > just see the notification icon, it's not going to automatically download
> > the updates. But if you take the EXTRA step to view the available updates,
> > and then click the DOWNLOAD button, the download should start. Am I
> > missing anything?
> >
> >
> > Fr@nk
> >
>
>
>