DFSR does not use DFS referrals. It replicates the underlying NTFS folders. The
setup wizard offers to create replication as for a pair of referrals as a help.
There is nothing to stop you setting up DFRS replication without and DFS name
space even existing.
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:35:09 -0500, Andy Martin <>
wrote:
>I'm cleaning up a configuration from another admin and wanted to see
>if anybody knew of any issues with the setup I have planned.
>
>First, the requirements I've been given:
>1) Application requires replication of files from 1 source server
>to 3 remote destination servers with no replication back to the source
>server
>2) User access to the data via browsing DFS should be avoided
>although we can't currently lock down NTFS and share rights (don't ask
>- I'm already boiling on that point)
>3) Company only allows one domain-based DFS tree per domain which
>is already in use extensively
>4) All servers involved are Windows Server 2003 SP2
>
>The previous admin configured a normal NTFRS hub-and-spoke replica set
>for a DFS link just off the root of the DFS tree.
>
>My plan:
>1) Disable replication links from the spoke servers back to the
>hub to enable one-way replication (and yes, we are VERY well aware of
>the issues here as we already use two other replica sets in the same
>configuration)
>2) Disable DFS referrals on all link targets in the replica set
>3) Fight like !@#$% to get the shares/NTFS locked down
>
>I know disabling referrals for some link targets in a replica set
>isn't a problem, but was more concerned if there are any problems with
>having referrals disabled on all link targets in a replica set (other
>than the obvious lack of access via DFS that I'm actually looking for
>in this case).
--
Dave Mills
There are 10 type of people, those that understand binary and those that don't.
|