Nvidia drivers 88-61

That's why there's something wrong with the drivers. The driver is not
activating the Turbo Cache to use memory from the system. In XP this works.
And JW has an onboard card and it is using 128mb from the system, right? so
there is something wrong with the drivers.

The question is: HOW DO I INSTALL THE NVIDIA DRIVERS? Everytime I do, it
doesn't work.

Willy.

"Tom Scales" wrote:

> I'm not sure what your question is. You DO have 16mb of memory on your
> card.
> "willy4360" <> wrote in message
> news40D3166-9CE6-4AF5-A8EA-...
> > Good to know.
> >
> > I managed to make glass to work (resolution: 1152 x 864), using the vista
> > native driver. I can see all the effects now, but the system still gives
> > bad
> > performance ratings because it only finds 16Mb of graphic memory. There's
> > got
> > to be something to do with drivers. I'm sure Nvidia drivers might do the
> > job,
> > but so far I've been unable to install them, it simply doesn't work,
> > Nvidia
> > can't find it's card :-).
> >
> > Is there a way to make the nvidia driver to work?
> >
> > Willy.
> >
> >
> > "JW" wrote:
> >
> >> I have a MOBO with onboard Intel graphics and all 128MB available to it
> >> comes from System Memory. After I installed Intel Vista drivers and
> >> once I
> >> updated main memory to the required 1MB Glass started working fine.
> >>
> >>
> >> "Zapper" <> wrote in message
> >> news:23C423B2-E6E8-4A1C-AD91-...
> >> >I don't think you can.
> >> >
> >> > Your "turbo cache" means that the card uses SYSTEM memory to hit that
> >> > number, not real on-board memory. Therefore you can only see glass at
> >> > lower resolutions(which can be handled by your onboard memory)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "willy4360" <> wrote in message
> >> > news:9A7FC874-CFE8-4A71-9B32-...
> >> >> Hello! Using Beta 2 shipped DVD.
> >> >>
> >> >> My card is a geoforce 6200 Turbo cache with 128mb.
> >> >>
> >> >> The vista driver does not allow aero. I installed the 88-66 Nvidia
> >> >> driver,
> >> >> but that didn't help. Only setting the resolution at 800 x 600 I can
> >> >> see
> >> >> the
> >> >> aero effects. I use a Hewlett Packard monitor, M700 and it is not
> >> >> being
> >> >> recognized as well.
> >> >>
> >> >> How can I get this video card to work with vista?
> >> >>
> >> >> Willy.
> >> >>
> >> >> "Murray legro" wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Thanks guys, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion it is best to
> >> >>> wait
> >> >>> for
> >> >>> the next lot of beta Nvidia drivers and at the moment just stick to
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> WDDM
> >> >>> drivers that came with Vista. It means that i cannot play any of my
> >> >>> games
> >> >>> like quake 4 etc but I do have Aero glass. Should not be too long
> >> >>> before
> >> >>> some better drivers are produced by Nvidia (I hope)
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "John" wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > Well at least my install still boots, almost every time that is,
> >> >>> > even
> >> >>> > though
> >> >>> > it takes forever after those drivers were installed. I have a FX
> >> >>> > 5500
> >> >>> > 256
> >> >>> > agp, but I think its the beta GeForce/Quattro drivers in general,
> >> >>> > not
> >> >>> > really
> >> >>> > which cards.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > "Rick" <> wrote in message
> >> >>> > news:...
> >> >>> > > The card is definitely capable of Aero Glass ans really should
> >> >>> > > have
> >> >>> > > it
> >> >>> > > with the default drivers in Vista. I have a FX 5500 and have the
> >> >>> > > same
> >> >>> > > problems trying to get the 66.61 drivers to install, but I have
> >> >>> > > Aero
> >> >>> > > Glass
> >> >>> > > with the default drivers.
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > John wrote:
> >> >>> > >> I don't know if your card is capable of Aero Glass or if you
> >> >>> > >> want
> >> >>> > >> to try
> >> >>> > >> any gaming, however if you don't care about that just stay with
> >> >>> > >> the
> >> >>> > >> default drivers.
> >> >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >> I use 88.61, and I have a severely long boot. I have had to
> >> >>> > >> already
> >> >>> > >> go
> >> >>> > >> into safe mode, uninstall the drivers, then reinstall them due
> >> >>> > >> to
> >> >>> > >> this
> >> >>> > >> problem. I don't do any gaming in Vista , but since I'm using
> >> >>> > >> the
> >> >>> > >> drivers
> >> >>> > >> Aero Glass is nice. I don't feel like reverting to a previous
> >> >>> > >> image with
> >> >>> > >> the default drivers at this time either since driver roll back
> >> >>> > >> does
> >> >>> > >> not
> >> >>> > >> work after these drivers are installed.
> >> >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >> Your choice, but they might not update them until much later,
> >> >>> > >> along
> >> >>> > >> with
> >> >>> > >> they might be designed for a later version of Vista so it might
> >> >>> > >> be
> >> >>> > >> best
> >> >>> > >> to wait for the next public release which should be RC1 unless
> >> >>> > >> your
> >> >>> > >> an
> >> >>> > >> official beta tester so you can run the updated drivers on the
> >> >>> > >> latest
> >> >>> > >> Vista release, however that is going to be a while either way.
> >> >>> > >>
> >> >>> > >> "Murray legro" <> wrote in
> >> >>> > >> message
> >> >>> > >> news:E2FFC695-43DA-4D94-BB6E-...
> >> >>> > >>> When I first installed Vista Beta 2 I also installed Nvidia
> >> >>> > >>> driver
> >> >>> > >>> 88-61. I
> >> >>> > >>> had no end of problems with blue screen frequently appearing
> >> >>> > >>> and
> >> >>> > >>> the
> >> >>> > >>> driver
> >> >>> > >>> ceasing to function.
> >> >>> > >>> Whilst i did a full install in lieu of upgrade did not format
> >> >>> > >>> and
> >> >>> > >>> as
> >> >>> > >>> such
> >> >>> > >>> my old files were retained.
> >> >>> > >>> Any the system went into a blue screen loop where i could not
> >> >>> > >>> boot
> >> >>> > >>> up.
> >> >>> > >>> Subsequently, i did a format of the relevant hard drive and a
> >> >>> > >>> full
> >> >>> > >>> clean
> >> >>> > >>> install.the system appear to be quite stable now(as much as a
> >> >>> > >>> beta
> >> >>> > >>> version
> >> >>> > >>> can be)
> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >>> > >>> my question is"should i now re-install the 88-61 Nvidia beta
> >> >>> > >>> drivers or
> >> >>> > >>> wait
> >> >>> > >>> until the next lot of Nvidia drivers appear". i am running a
> >> >>> > >>> Acer
> >> >>> > >>> SA10
> >> >>> > >>> system with a gigabyte GV-N66256DP graphics card. Whilst the
> >> >>> > >>> motherboard
> >> >>> > >>> only runs AGP4, the card is AGP8 capable
> >> >>> > >>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>

The release notes for the 88.61 drivers state that the release supports the
6200 TC card. How much actual memory do you have on your 6200 TC card. I
ask this since I beleive that MCE 2005 on XP required that a 6200 TC card
actually have 32MB of onboard memory.
What happens if you just ask Vista to search for drivers on your system
drive?
What error do you get when trying to install the 88.61 drivers?
Is the BIOS for your MOBO uptodate?

"willy4360" <> wrote in message
news:6D382B83-450B-4D2F-B339-...
> That's why there's something wrong with the drivers. The driver is not
> activating the Turbo Cache to use memory from the system. In XP this
> works.
> And JW has an onboard card and it is using 128mb from the system, right?
> so
> there is something wrong with the drivers.
>
> The question is: HOW DO I INSTALL THE NVIDIA DRIVERS? Everytime I do, it
> doesn't work.
>
> Willy.
>
> "Tom Scales" wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure what your question is. You DO have 16mb of memory on your
>> card.
>> "willy4360" <> wrote in message
>> news40D3166-9CE6-4AF5-A8EA-...
>> > Good to know.
>> >
>> > I managed to make glass to work (resolution: 1152 x 864), using the
>> > vista
>> > native driver. I can see all the effects now, but the system still
>> > gives
>> > bad
>> > performance ratings because it only finds 16Mb of graphic memory.
>> > There's
>> > got
>> > to be something to do with drivers. I'm sure Nvidia drivers might do
>> > the
>> > job,
>> > but so far I've been unable to install them, it simply doesn't work,
>> > Nvidia
>> > can't find it's card :-).
>> >
>> > Is there a way to make the nvidia driver to work?
>> >
>> > Willy.
>> >
>> >
>> > "JW" wrote:
>> >
>> >> I have a MOBO with onboard Intel graphics and all 128MB available to
>> >> it
>> >> comes from System Memory. After I installed Intel Vista drivers and
>> >> once I
>> >> updated main memory to the required 1MB Glass started working fine.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Zapper" <> wrote in message
>> >> news:23C423B2-E6E8-4A1C-AD91-...
>> >> >I don't think you can.
>> >> >
>> >> > Your "turbo cache" means that the card uses SYSTEM memory to hit
>> >> > that
>> >> > number, not real on-board memory. Therefore you can only see glass
>> >> > at
>> >> > lower resolutions(which can be handled by your onboard memory)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > "willy4360" <> wrote in message
>> >> > news:9A7FC874-CFE8-4A71-9B32-...
>> >> >> Hello! Using Beta 2 shipped DVD.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> My card is a geoforce 6200 Turbo cache with 128mb.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The vista driver does not allow aero. I installed the 88-66 Nvidia
>> >> >> driver,
>> >> >> but that didn't help. Only setting the resolution at 800 x 600 I
>> >> >> can
>> >> >> see
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> aero effects. I use a Hewlett Packard monitor, M700 and it is not
>> >> >> being
>> >> >> recognized as well.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> How can I get this video card to work with vista?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Willy.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Murray legro" wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Thanks guys, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion it is best to
>> >> >>> wait
>> >> >>> for
>> >> >>> the next lot of beta Nvidia drivers and at the moment just stick
>> >> >>> to
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> WDDM
>> >> >>> drivers that came with Vista. It means that i cannot play any of
>> >> >>> my
>> >> >>> games
>> >> >>> like quake 4 etc but I do have Aero glass. Should not be too long
>> >> >>> before
>> >> >>> some better drivers are produced by Nvidia (I hope)
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> "John" wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> > Well at least my install still boots, almost every time that is,
>> >> >>> > even
>> >> >>> > though
>> >> >>> > it takes forever after those drivers were installed. I have a
>> >> >>> > FX
>> >> >>> > 5500
>> >> >>> > 256
>> >> >>> > agp, but I think its the beta GeForce/Quattro drivers in
>> >> >>> > general,
>> >> >>> > not
>> >> >>> > really
>> >> >>> > which cards.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > "Rick" <> wrote in message
>> >> >>> > news:...
>> >> >>> > > The card is definitely capable of Aero Glass ans really should
>> >> >>> > > have
>> >> >>> > > it
>> >> >>> > > with the default drivers in Vista. I have a FX 5500 and have
>> >> >>> > > the
>> >> >>> > > same
>> >> >>> > > problems trying to get the 66.61 drivers to install, but I
>> >> >>> > > have
>> >> >>> > > Aero
>> >> >>> > > Glass
>> >> >>> > > with the default drivers.
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > > John wrote:
>> >> >>> > >> I don't know if your card is capable of Aero Glass or if you
>> >> >>> > >> want
>> >> >>> > >> to try
>> >> >>> > >> any gaming, however if you don't care about that just stay
>> >> >>> > >> with
>> >> >>> > >> the
>> >> >>> > >> default drivers.
>> >> >>> > >>
>> >> >>> > >> I use 88.61, and I have a severely long boot. I have had to
>> >> >>> > >> already
>> >> >>> > >> go
>> >> >>> > >> into safe mode, uninstall the drivers, then reinstall them
>> >> >>> > >> due
>> >> >>> > >> to
>> >> >>> > >> this
>> >> >>> > >> problem. I don't do any gaming in Vista , but since I'm using
>> >> >>> > >> the
>> >> >>> > >> drivers
>> >> >>> > >> Aero Glass is nice. I don't feel like reverting to a
>> >> >>> > >> previous
>> >> >>> > >> image with
>> >> >>> > >> the default drivers at this time either since driver roll
>> >> >>> > >> back
>> >> >>> > >> does
>> >> >>> > >> not
>> >> >>> > >> work after these drivers are installed.
>> >> >>> > >>
>> >> >>> > >> Your choice, but they might not update them until much later,
>> >> >>> > >> along
>> >> >>> > >> with
>> >> >>> > >> they might be designed for a later version of Vista so it
>> >> >>> > >> might
>> >> >>> > >> be
>> >> >>> > >> best
>> >> >>> > >> to wait for the next public release which should be RC1
>> >> >>> > >> unless
>> >> >>> > >> your
>> >> >>> > >> an
>> >> >>> > >> official beta tester so you can run the updated drivers on
>> >> >>> > >> the
>> >> >>> > >> latest
>> >> >>> > >> Vista release, however that is going to be a while either
>> >> >>> > >> way.
>> >> >>> > >>
>> >> >>> > >> "Murray legro" <> wrote
>> >> >>> > >> in
>> >> >>> > >> message
>> >> >>> > >> news:E2FFC695-43DA-4D94-BB6E-...
>> >> >>> > >>> When I first installed Vista Beta 2 I also installed Nvidia
>> >> >>> > >>> driver
>> >> >>> > >>> 88-61. I
>> >> >>> > >>> had no end of problems with blue screen frequently appearing
>> >> >>> > >>> and
>> >> >>> > >>> the
>> >> >>> > >>> driver
>> >> >>> > >>> ceasing to function.
>> >> >>> > >>> Whilst i did a full install in lieu of upgrade did not
>> >> >>> > >>> format
>> >> >>> > >>> and
>> >> >>> > >>> as
>> >> >>> > >>> such
>> >> >>> > >>> my old files were retained.
>> >> >>> > >>> Any the system went into a blue screen loop where i could
>> >> >>> > >>> not
>> >> >>> > >>> boot
>> >> >>> > >>> up.
>> >> >>> > >>> Subsequently, i did a format of the relevant hard drive and
>> >> >>> > >>> a
>> >> >>> > >>> full
>> >> >>> > >>> clean
>> >> >>> > >>> install.the system appear to be quite stable now(as much as
>> >> >>> > >>> a
>> >> >>> > >>> beta
>> >> >>> > >>> version
>> >> >>> > >>> can be)
>> >> >>> > >>>
>> >> >>> > >>> my question is"should i now re-install the 88-61 Nvidia beta
>> >> >>> > >>> drivers or
>> >> >>> > >>> wait
>> >> >>> > >>> until the next lot of Nvidia drivers appear". i am running
>> >> >>> > >>> a
>> >> >>> > >>> Acer
>> >> >>> > >>> SA10
>> >> >>> > >>> system with a gigabyte GV-N66256DP graphics card. Whilst
>> >> >>> > >>> the
>> >> >>> > >>> motherboard
>> >> >>> > >>> only runs AGP4, the card is AGP8 capable
>> >> >>> > >>
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>

I think my card has only 16MB of actual memory. But it works fine on XP using
TC.

Actually I am using Vista drivers for the card and it enabled all the
effects. The nvidia driver never gives me errors, it simply doesn't
recognizes the card and it doesn't enable the Turbo Cache technology.

There's got to be a way to enable the Turbo Cache on the card. If this is
not solved, I am thinking on buying a 6600 256mb Pci-e card, but I would love
to find a fix for the problem first.

Willy.

"JW" wrote:

> The release notes for the 88.61 drivers state that the release supports the
> 6200 TC card. How much actual memory do you have on your 6200 TC card. I
> ask this since I beleive that MCE 2005 on XP required that a 6200 TC card
> actually have 32MB of onboard memory.
> What happens if you just ask Vista to search for drivers on your system
> drive?
> What error do you get when trying to install the 88.61 drivers?
> Is the BIOS for your MOBO uptodate?
>
> "willy4360" <> wrote in message
> news:6D382B83-450B-4D2F-B339-...
> > That's why there's something wrong with the drivers. The driver is not
> > activating the Turbo Cache to use memory from the system. In XP this
> > works.
> > And JW has an onboard card and it is using 128mb from the system, right?
> > so
> > there is something wrong with the drivers.
> >
> > The question is: HOW DO I INSTALL THE NVIDIA DRIVERS? Everytime I do, it
> > doesn't work.
> >
> > Willy.
> >
> > "Tom Scales" wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not sure what your question is. You DO have 16mb of memory on your
> >> card.
> >> "willy4360" <> wrote in message
> >> news40D3166-9CE6-4AF5-A8EA-...
> >> > Good to know.
> >> >
> >> > I managed to make glass to work (resolution: 1152 x 864), using the
> >> > vista
> >> > native driver. I can see all the effects now, but the system still
> >> > gives
> >> > bad
> >> > performance ratings because it only finds 16Mb of graphic memory.
> >> > There's
> >> > got
> >> > to be something to do with drivers. I'm sure Nvidia drivers might do
> >> > the
> >> > job,
> >> > but so far I've been unable to install them, it simply doesn't work,
> >> > Nvidia
> >> > can't find it's card :-).
> >> >
> >> > Is there a way to make the nvidia driver to work?
> >> >
> >> > Willy.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "JW" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I have a MOBO with onboard Intel graphics and all 128MB available to
> >> >> it
> >> >> comes from System Memory. After I installed Intel Vista drivers and
> >> >> once I
> >> >> updated main memory to the required 1MB Glass started working fine.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> "Zapper" <> wrote in message
> >> >> news:23C423B2-E6E8-4A1C-AD91-...
> >> >> >I don't think you can.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Your "turbo cache" means that the card uses SYSTEM memory to hit
> >> >> > that
> >> >> > number, not real on-board memory. Therefore you can only see glass
> >> >> > at
> >> >> > lower resolutions(which can be handled by your onboard memory)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "willy4360" <> wrote in message
> >> >> > news:9A7FC874-CFE8-4A71-9B32-...
> >> >> >> Hello! Using Beta 2 shipped DVD.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> My card is a geoforce 6200 Turbo cache with 128mb.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The vista driver does not allow aero. I installed the 88-66 Nvidia
> >> >> >> driver,
> >> >> >> but that didn't help. Only setting the resolution at 800 x 600 I
> >> >> >> can
> >> >> >> see
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> aero effects. I use a Hewlett Packard monitor, M700 and it is not
> >> >> >> being
> >> >> >> recognized as well.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> How can I get this video card to work with vista?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Willy.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> "Murray legro" wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Thanks guys, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion it is best to
> >> >> >>> wait
> >> >> >>> for
> >> >> >>> the next lot of beta Nvidia drivers and at the moment just stick
> >> >> >>> to
> >> >> >>> the
> >> >> >>> WDDM
> >> >> >>> drivers that came with Vista. It means that i cannot play any of
> >> >> >>> my
> >> >> >>> games
> >> >> >>> like quake 4 etc but I do have Aero glass. Should not be too long
> >> >> >>> before
> >> >> >>> some better drivers are produced by Nvidia (I hope)
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> "John" wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> > Well at least my install still boots, almost every time that is,
> >> >> >>> > even
> >> >> >>> > though
> >> >> >>> > it takes forever after those drivers were installed. I have a
> >> >> >>> > FX
> >> >> >>> > 5500
> >> >> >>> > 256
> >> >> >>> > agp, but I think its the beta GeForce/Quattro drivers in
> >> >> >>> > general,
> >> >> >>> > not
> >> >> >>> > really
> >> >> >>> > which cards.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > "Rick" <> wrote in message
> >> >> >>> > news:...
> >> >> >>> > > The card is definitely capable of Aero Glass ans really should
> >> >> >>> > > have
> >> >> >>> > > it
> >> >> >>> > > with the default drivers in Vista. I have a FX 5500 and have
> >> >> >>> > > the
> >> >> >>> > > same
> >> >> >>> > > problems trying to get the 66.61 drivers to install, but I
> >> >> >>> > > have
> >> >> >>> > > Aero
> >> >> >>> > > Glass
> >> >> >>> > > with the default drivers.
> >> >> >>> > >
> >> >> >>> > >
> >> >> >>> > > John wrote:
> >> >> >>> > >> I don't know if your card is capable of Aero Glass or if you
> >> >> >>> > >> want
> >> >> >>> > >> to try
> >> >> >>> > >> any gaming, however if you don't care about that just stay
> >> >> >>> > >> with
> >> >> >>> > >> the
> >> >> >>> > >> default drivers.
> >> >> >>> > >>
> >> >> >>> > >> I use 88.61, and I have a severely long boot. I have had to
> >> >> >>> > >> already
> >> >> >>> > >> go
> >> >> >>> > >> into safe mode, uninstall the drivers, then reinstall them
> >> >> >>> > >> due
> >> >> >>> > >> to
> >> >> >>> > >> this
> >> >> >>> > >> problem. I don't do any gaming in Vista , but since I'm using
> >> >> >>> > >> the
> >> >> >>> > >> drivers
> >> >> >>> > >> Aero Glass is nice. I don't feel like reverting to a
> >> >> >>> > >> previous
> >> >> >>> > >> image with
> >> >> >>> > >> the default drivers at this time either since driver roll
> >> >> >>> > >> back
> >> >> >>> > >> does
> >> >> >>> > >> not
> >> >> >>> > >> work after these drivers are installed.
> >> >> >>> > >>
> >> >> >>> > >> Your choice, but they might not update them until much later,
> >> >> >>> > >> along
> >> >> >>> > >> with
> >> >> >>> > >> they might be designed for a later version of Vista so it
> >> >> >>> > >> might
> >> >> >>> > >> be
> >> >> >>> > >> best
> >> >> >>> > >> to wait for the next public release which should be RC1
> >> >> >>> > >> unless
> >> >> >>> > >> your
> >> >> >>> > >> an
> >> >> >>> > >> official beta tester so you can run the updated drivers on
> >> >> >>> > >> the
> >> >> >>> > >> latest
> >> >> >>> > >> Vista release, however that is going to be a while either
> >> >> >>> > >> way.
> >> >> >>> > >>
> >> >> >>> > >> "Murray legro" <> wrote
> >> >> >>> > >> in
> >> >> >>> > >> message
> >> >> >>> > >> news:E2FFC695-43DA-4D94-BB6E-...
> >> >> >>> > >>> When I first installed Vista Beta 2 I also installed Nvidia
> >> >> >>> > >>> driver
> >> >> >>> > >>> 88-61. I
> >> >> >>> > >>> had no end of problems with blue screen frequently appearing
> >> >> >>> > >>> and
> >> >> >>> > >>> the
> >> >> >>> > >>> driver
> >> >> >>> > >>> ceasing to function.
> >> >> >>> > >>> Whilst i did a full install in lieu of upgrade did not
> >> >> >>> > >>> format
> >> >> >>> > >>> and
> >> >> >>> > >>> as
> >> >> >>> > >>> such
> >> >> >>> > >>> my old files were retained.
> >> >> >>> > >>> Any the system went into a blue screen loop where i could
> >> >> >>> > >>> not
> >> >> >>> > >>> boot
> >> >> >>> > >>> up.
> >> >> >>> > >>> Subsequently, i did a format of the relevant hard drive and
> >> >> >>> > >>> a
> >> >> >>> > >>> full
> >> >> >>> > >>> clean
> >> >> >>> > >>> install.the system appear to be quite stable now(as much as
> >> >> >>> > >>> a
> >> >> >>> > >>> beta
> >> >> >>> > >>> version
> >> >> >>> > >>> can be)
> >> >> >>> > >>>
> >> >> >>> > >>> my question is"should i now re-install the 88-61 Nvidia beta
> >> >> >>> > >>> drivers or
> >> >> >>> > >>> wait
> >> >> >>> > >>> until the next lot of Nvidia drivers appear". i am running
> >> >> >>> > >>> a
> >> >> >>> > >>> Acer
> >> >> >>> > >>> SA10
> >> >> >>> > >>> system with a gigabyte GV-N66256DP graphics card. Whilst
> >> >> >>> > >>> the
> >> >> >>> > >>> motherboard
> >> >> >>> > >>> only runs AGP4, the card is AGP8 capable
> >> >> >>> > >>
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>