Official Release of IE8 at 12PM; hacked before 5PM

http://www.techspot.com/news/33977-s...g-contest.html

You would "love" for this to be true. Apparently you did NOT do any
homework. He hacked a version that was included with Windows 7. Do you know
what beta means? Internet Explorer RTM is NOT available for Windows 7.

Try again!

--

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP
Windows Desktop Experience



"+Bob+" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
> http://www.techspot.com/news/33977-s...g-contest.html
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3950 (20090320) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3950 (20090320) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

"+Bob+" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
> http://www.techspot.com/news/33977-s...g-contest.html

Typical retard douche bag. A beta version of Windows 7 was used. You
can't read, can you?

Frank wrote:
> +Bob+ wrote:
>> http://www.techspot.com/news/33977-s...g-contest.html
>>
>
> They were all hacked, dumb ass!

Not a one was hacked in Ubuntu.

*snigger*

Alias

On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:07:06 -0400, "Richard Urban"
<> wrote:

>You would "love" for this to be true. Apparently you did NOT do any
>homework. He hacked a version that was included with Windows 7. Do you know
>what beta means? Internet Explorer RTM is NOT available for Windows 7.
>
>Try again!
>
>--
>
>Richard Urban
>Microsoft MVP
>Windows Desktop Experience

Yawn. I give you 99.999% odds the bug is still there in the RTM. But,
let's wait, I'm sure there are a few hundred more to be documented
(not the least of which, the massive incompatibility problem with
sites that worked in IE7). I can hear the howls of the public already.

On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:47:25 -0700, "measekite's psychiatrist"
<> wrote:

>But Ubuntu doesn't have any decent programs to hack. Therefore it's a
>complete waste of time to hack a system that NOBODY uses. Remember, Ubuntu
>is on less than ONE PERCENT of the desktops out there so Ubuntu doesn't
>amount to much.
>
>Ubuntu is free and Nobody wants it.

You want it. Your only reason for existence is to back Ubuntu. What
would you do if it went away?

"MBUnit" <> wrote in message
news:...
> +Bob+ wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:47:25 -0700, "measekite's psychiatrist"
>> <> wrote:
>>
>>> But Ubuntu doesn't have any decent programs to hack. Therefore it's a
>>> complete waste of time to hack a system that NOBODY uses. Remember,
>>> Ubuntu is on less than ONE PERCENT of the desktops out there so Ubuntu
>>> doesn't amount to much.
>>>
>>> Ubuntu is free and Nobody wants it.
>>
>> You want it. Your only reason for existence is to back Ubuntu. What
>> would you do if it went away?
>
> A+Bumbling+Bob+Moron = Bumbling Moron, you should take your sanity pill,
> because you don't make any sense here, and you seem very confused.

So dipshit, how long have you worked at McDonald's?

"+Bob+" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:07:06 -0400, "Richard Urban"
> <> wrote:
>
>>You would "love" for this to be true. Apparently you did NOT do any
>>homework. He hacked a version that was included with Windows 7. Do you
>>know
>>what beta means? Internet Explorer RTM is NOT available for Windows 7.
>>
>>Try again!
>>
>>--
>>
>>Richard Urban
>>Microsoft MVP
>>Windows Desktop Experience
>
> Yawn. I give you 99.999% odds the bug is still there in the RTM. But,
> let's wait, I'm sure there are a few hundred more to be documented
> (not the least of which, the massive incompatibility problem with
> sites that worked in IE7). I can hear the howls of the public already.
>
>

YOU are confused. Those are hows they are making at you. Better shove your
head back up your ass where it belongs.

On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:22:00 -0700, "measekite's psychiatrist"
<> wrote:

>> Yawn. I give you 99.999% odds the bug is still there in the RTM. But,
>> let's wait, I'm sure there are a few hundred more to be documented
>> (not the least of which, the massive incompatibility problem with
>> sites that worked in IE7). I can hear the howls of the public already.
>>
>>
>
>YOU are confused. Those are hows they are making at you. Better shove your
>head back up your ass where it belongs.

See you in a month, fat boy.

"+Bob+" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:22:00 -0700, "measekite's psychiatrist"
> <> wrote:
>
>>> Yawn. I give you 99.999% odds the bug is still there in the RTM. But,
>>> let's wait, I'm sure there are a few hundred more to be documented
>>> (not the least of which, the massive incompatibility problem with
>>> sites that worked in IE7). I can hear the howls of the public already.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>YOU are confused. Those are hows they are making at you. Better shove
>>your
>>head back up your ass where it belongs.
>
> See you in a month, fat boy.

Where you going? You doing 30 days in lockup? Let us know your progress
when you get released.