"Patrick Keenan" <> wrote in message
news:OlScL$%...
> "Ciarán Ó Duibhín" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> Thanks, Dominic.
>>
>> The reason I'm persevering with this old application - which hasn't been
>> developed or supported for well over 10 years - is that it is trainable
>> to recognize the non-Latin alphabet I'm working with. I've tried and
>> failed to train FineReader on the same alphabet. I don't know of any
>> other OCR application which is trainable from scratch on an alphabet.
>>
>> I'm operating at present on Vista by using a modern application to scan
>> the pages to TIFF images, and using the old application to do the
>> recognition on the TIFFs. It would be a lot more convenient to have one
>> application do both parts of the work.
>>
>> So I'm willing to spend some effort in getting the old app to talk to the
>> scanner, if someone can help me to understand and fix it, or can convince
>> me that it can't be fixed. In the second case, my best option may be to
>> go back to using it in Win95.
>
> You may be better off finding a used XP Pro system - I regularly see these
> for under CDN$150 - and using that for the scanner. Share the output
> folder.
>
> You can waste a lot of time coming to the conclusion that an old piece of
> software just won't work properly under a newer OS. If your time has any
> value at all, a used, dedicated machine can be *cheaper*.
>
> HTH
> -pk
>
>>
>> "Dominic Payer" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>> OCR programs tend to work closely with the OS. If this is a very old
>>> application, it is probably not compatible with Vista and you will need
>>> an up-to-date OCR program.
>>
>
>
You might try this program's trial to see if you can get it to work. I has
OCR scanning and runs well on my Windows Vista 64-Bit system.
http://www.hamrick.com/