On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:20:57 -0400, "Bill Leary" <>
wrote:
> "Ken Blake, MVP" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> > If you have more than one physical drive, then having it on a second
> > drive can help, because that decreases head movement to and from it.
>
> I'd never considered moving the page file before, but I've recently made
> some changes and I now have two HDs, but one is used only for backups so
> most of the time it's not being used at all. What kind of improvement might
> I expect moving the page file to that drive? I know that "it depends," but
> is there some way to make a guess at it?
>
> I've got 2G of RAM.
Two points regarding your question:
1. I would *not* put the page file on a backup drive.
2. Go to
http://billsway.com/notes%5Fpublic/winxp%5Ftweaks/ and
download WinXP-2K_Pagefile.zip and monitor your page file usage. If
page file use is small, moving it won't help you.
One additional point: if you are backing up to a second internal
drive, you are playing with fire. I don't recommend backup to a second
non-removable hard drive because it leaves you susceptible to
simultaneous loss of the original and backup to many of the most
common dangers: severe power glitches, nearby lightning strikes, virus
attacks, even theft of the computer.
In my view, secure backup needs to be on removable media, and not kept
in the computer. For really secure backup (needed, for example, if the
life of your business depends on your data) you should have multiple
generations of backup, and at least one of those generations should be
stored off-site.
You might want to read this article on backup I've written: "Back Up
Your Computer Regularly and Reliably" at
http://www.computorcompanion.com/LPMArticle.asp?ID=314
--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup