On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:44:27 +0000 (UTC),
(the wharf
rat) wrote:
>In article <>,
>Ringmaster <> wrote:
>>One thing I love about fanboys is they endlessly tell us how wonderful
>>Vista is then in the next breath link to some web site that confirms
>
> Very few LVM systems allow shrink volume at all, so in that way
>at least Vista's ahead of some. I think AIX is the only one that actually
>gets it right. Linux lvreduce mostly works but can corrupt the filesystem
>and drops data that existed in the former data blocks.
Yes, but the point is you shouldn't need to purchase third party
software to do something the OS itself should be capable of on it's
own.
The list of Windows failures is way too long to list fully but some
notable flaws that impact many follow:
1. The shell, Windows Explorer, has been fu*ked up for years and
Microsoft makes no attempt to truly fix it. Even many died in the
wool MVP's that otherwise endlessly sing the praises of Windows
hate it and admit they use something else.
2. UAC. The mere mention of it is enough to rile anyone.
3. Movie Maker. One of the biggest pieces of crap ever from
Microsoft refuses to play video files or starts, then chokes
while many third party free software have no issues at all
playing the same files.
4. Stupid things like Windows "forgetting" drive letter assignments
for USB devices, also not remembering how you arranged your icons
on your desktop if you change users or resolution or deciding to
change which folder view is shown regardless what you do.
5. The dreaded Explorer needs to close because... BS and never once
giving any valid reason why other than saying it is some internal
Windows file causing it.
6. Ridiculously long file processing times when copying or moving
files.
This takes us back to basic file system upkeep. Disk Management in
Vista is pitiful, clumsy and crude. You have issues resizing a
partition or pushing unallocated space back and forth. Using the
included disk defragmenter tool is laughable with it never doing
a decent job and precious little feedback. The poor implementation of
so-called security features forcing users to deal with cryptic file
permissions and ownerships.
There's simply too many rough spots for a product (Windows) that's
been on the market for over twenty years.