I'm sorry, but I don't know what you're asking here. Or you don't know what
you're asking. Not sure which.
By and large updates, including security updates, are for the most part
SP-agnostic; they neither know nor care which SP they're updating. When
Microsoft releases a SP, they include the available security patches to that
point, plus widely-available updates, plus product updates, and a great many
other things. This is documented with the release of any SP - a KB article
tells you exactly what the SP does and does not contain.
Simply because you have don't SP2 installed does not mean that you do not
need any updates since SP2; and in fact almost all of the updates released
since SP2 almost certainly apply to any Vista computer whether it is at SP1
or SP2. It is about as certain as it can be that you need all the security
updates released since SP2 whether you are at SP2 or SP1.
"Dick" <> wrote in message
news:...
> So the MS update system doesn't recognize that a computer doesn't have the
> subproduct that it is updating? Why would anyone want to install bloat
> for SP2 if SP2 isn't even on the machine? What am I missing?
>
> If I install SP2 without installing the remaining patches, will I still
> have the opportunity to install them at a later date?
>
> Richard G. Harper wrote
>> Almost certainly not as there are patches and updates that have been
>> released since SP2 was released.
>>
>> "Dick" <> wrote in message
>> news:#...
>>> I purchased an HP Pavilions laptop, with Vista Home Premium SP1, 3-4
>>> months ago. There were about 35-40 security patches waiting for download
>>> and installation. I haven't gotten around to installing all of them
>>> yet. Does SP2 include all of those patches?
>>>
>>> TIA
>>
>
>
|