PC MAG vista SP1 review....

This is a multiple page review.. be sure to click on the NEXT links on the
bottom so you can see the rest of the pages

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2192557,00.asp

Who really gives a RATS ASS. Hey, thanks for cutting a link and posting it
here so we can navigate to the news.

I guess you have nothing better to do.

Just FYI


"Thai Berry (U.S.)" <> wrote in message
news:...
> This is a multiple page review.. be sure to click on the NEXT links on the
> bottom so you can see the rest of the pages
>
> http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2192557,00.asp
>

On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:19:34 -0700, "Bill Yanaire" <>
wrote:

>Who really gives a RATS ASS.

You do. Fanboys care more about what's said about Vista and SP1 then
any rat's ass, THEIR REPUTATION is on the line. So of course the
fanboy crowd will try to poo-poo anything reviewed on this topic if it
confirms many of the things reported here since reading what's said in
reviews makes the fanboy crowd look like the damn fools they are.

Over a month ago Microsoft announced SP1 was going into beta. Now we
are starting to see reviews of what's changed addressed by the beta.

OH MY GOD... a lot of the problems the moronic fanboy crowd denied and
kept saying wasn't true or was because the user done something wrong
have now been corrected/changed/fixed/improved by Microsoft including
the slow copy issue. That sure does blow the creditability of fanboys
in general, Frank and a few other special idiots in particular.

ROTFLMAO!

Now the only question is will you clowns admit I was right all along
or will you just gone on pretending?

I already know the answer. but hey, I'm giving you clowns a chance to
own up to all your lies and admit you were wrong. Frank in particular.
Any men out there that can admit they screwed-up or still just loud
little boys that like to stamp their feet and scream and yell?

"Adam Albright" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:19:34 -0700, "Bill Yanaire" <>
> wrote:
>
>>Who really gives a RATS ASS.
>
> You do. Fanboys care more about what's said about Vista and SP1 then
> any rat's ass, THEIR REPUTATION is on the line. So of course the
> fanboy crowd will try to poo-poo anything reviewed on this topic if it
> confirms many of the things reported here since reading what's said in
> reviews makes the fanboy crowd look like the damn fools they are.
>
> Over a month ago Microsoft announced SP1 was going into beta. Now we
> are starting to see reviews of what's changed addressed by the beta.
>
> OH MY GOD... a lot of the problems the moronic fanboy crowd denied and
> kept saying wasn't true or was because the user done something wrong
> have now been corrected/changed/fixed/improved by Microsoft including
> the slow copy issue. That sure does blow the creditability of fanboys
> in general, Frank and a few other special idiots in particular.
>
> ROTFLMAO!
>
> Now the only question is will you clowns admit I was right all along
> or will you just gone on pretending?
>
> I already know the answer. but hey, I'm giving you clowns a chance to
> own up to all your lies and admit you were wrong. Frank in particular.
> Any men out there that can admit they screwed-up or still just loud
> little boys that like to stamp their feet and scream and yell?
>


Who ever said there were NO issues with Vista?
There are small ones, but they are mostly vastly exaggerated by buffoons
like yourself.
This Vista release is far more stable than XP at the same point after
initial release.
Whether you think so or not doesn't matter, as I like Vista.
If file copy is 157 milliseconds slower, it doesn't eat at myself like it
appears to eat at you.
If it is just "pretty eye candy", well I like it, paid $250 for it, and
still like it.
Period Idiot Albright.

You get that Albright?

What you think, believe, can link to, can reference to, can read in an
article doesn't matter.

What lies?
Are you paranoid?
In a contest?
Is this your BIG MOMENT IN LIFE, posting in a ng?

> There are small ones
> This Vista release is far more stable than XP If file copy is 157
> milliseconds slower

Do to the contents of your last post, I have the privilege to announce to
you:

CONGRATULATIONS: You just joined a very small but disgusting group of scum
under-the-rock dweller, vistaboy-monkeys!!

You are the youngest member, now, only 14 years of age.

MAY THE SLIME BE WITH YOU!




"fourteen" <> wrote in message
news:eb%...
> "Adam Albright" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:19:34 -0700, "Bill Yanaire" <>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Who really gives a RATS ASS.
>>
>> You do. Fanboys care more about what's said about Vista and SP1 then
>> any rat's ass, THEIR REPUTATION is on the line. So of course the
>> fanboy crowd will try to poo-poo anything reviewed on this topic if it
>> confirms many of the things reported here since reading what's said in
>> reviews makes the fanboy crowd look like the damn fools they are.
>>
>> Over a month ago Microsoft announced SP1 was going into beta. Now we
>> are starting to see reviews of what's changed addressed by the beta.
>>
>> OH MY GOD... a lot of the problems the moronic fanboy crowd denied and
>> kept saying wasn't true or was because the user done something wrong
>> have now been corrected/changed/fixed/improved by Microsoft including
>> the slow copy issue. That sure does blow the creditability of fanboys
>> in general, Frank and a few other special idiots in particular.
>>
>> ROTFLMAO!
>>
>> Now the only question is will you clowns admit I was right all along
>> or will you just gone on pretending?
>>
>> I already know the answer. but hey, I'm giving you clowns a chance to
>> own up to all your lies and admit you were wrong. Frank in particular.
>> Any men out there that can admit they screwed-up or still just loud
>> little boys that like to stamp their feet and scream and yell?
>>
>
>
> Who ever said there were NO issues with Vista?
> There are small ones, but they are mostly vastly exaggerated by buffoons
> like yourself.
> This Vista release is far more stable than XP at the same point after
> initial release.
> Whether you think so or not doesn't matter, as I like Vista.
> If file copy is 157 milliseconds slower, it doesn't eat at myself like it
> appears to eat at you.
> If it is just "pretty eye candy", well I like it, paid $250 for it, and
> still like it.
> Period Idiot Albright.
>
> You get that Albright?
>
> What you think, believe, can link to, can reference to, can read in an
> article doesn't matter.
>
> What lies?
> Are you paranoid?
> In a contest?
> Is this your BIG MOMENT IN LIFE, posting in a ng?
>

On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:00:53 -0400, "fourteen" <>
wrote:

>Who ever said there were NO issues with Vista?

Oh, that's funny!

>There are small ones, but they are mostly vastly exaggerated by buffoons
>like yourself.

Well I guess I'm in good company then since the buffoons at Microsoft
thought they were serious enough to address in SP1.

>This Vista release is far more stable than XP at the same point after
>initial release.

Same old bullshit we heard from idiots like you with every new version
of Windows. Yet every last single version of Windows needs the same
kind of patches, fixes, "security" updates and service packs.

>Whether you think so or not doesn't matter, as I like Vista.

Whoopee for you. Babies suck their thumbs and they pee in their
diapers. In time they outgrow such behavior. A fanboy will be an idiot
forever.

>If file copy is 157 milliseconds slower, it doesn't eat at myself like it
>appears to eat at you.

Typical fanboy stupidity. It is well documented that for SOME users
file copying is dramatically slower then in XP. Hell man, wake up and
smell the coffee. Some of the MVPs you worship have admitted right in
this newsgroup they don't use Windows Explorer themselves.

>If it is just "pretty eye candy", well I like it, paid $250 for it, and
>still like it.

You like flashing lights, loud noises and balloons too?

>You get that Albright?

I get that you're such another fool. You're nothing special. Just a
typical garden variety fool. Newsgroups are full of dopes like you.
You keep needing to prove it over and over that's all you are. That
more than anything PROVES you're just a fool because you never learn
from your mistakes.
>
>What you think, believe, can link to, can reference to, can read in an
>article doesn't matter.

Those that refuse to learn are doomed to repeat their mistakes. Duh!
>
>What lies?
>Are you paranoid?
>In a contest?
>Is this your BIG MOMENT IN LIFE, posting in a ng?

Nope, but kicking the crap out of morons like you is sure fun. You
always come back for more. So, till next time. ;-)

"Thai Berry (U.S.)" <> wrote in message
news:470aba5e$...
>> There are small ones
>> This Vista release is far more stable than XP If file copy is 157
>> milliseconds slower
>
> Do to the contents of your last post, I have the privilege to announce to
> you:
>
> CONGRATULATIONS: You just joined a very small but disgusting group of scum
> under-the-rock dweller, vistaboy-monkeys!!
>
> You are the youngest member, now, only 14 years of age.
>
> MAY THE SLIME BE WITH YOU!
>
>
>
>
> "fourteen" <> wrote in message
> news:eb%...
>> "Adam Albright" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:19:34 -0700, "Bill Yanaire" <>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Who really gives a RATS ASS.
>>>
>>> You do. Fanboys care more about what's said about Vista and SP1 then
>>> any rat's ass, THEIR REPUTATION is on the line. So of course the
>>> fanboy crowd will try to poo-poo anything reviewed on this topic if it
>>> confirms many of the things reported here since reading what's said in
>>> reviews makes the fanboy crowd look like the damn fools they are.
>>>
>>> Over a month ago Microsoft announced SP1 was going into beta. Now we
>>> are starting to see reviews of what's changed addressed by the beta.
>>>
>>> OH MY GOD... a lot of the problems the moronic fanboy crowd denied and
>>> kept saying wasn't true or was because the user done something wrong
>>> have now been corrected/changed/fixed/improved by Microsoft including
>>> the slow copy issue. That sure does blow the creditability of fanboys
>>> in general, Frank and a few other special idiots in particular.
>>>
>>> ROTFLMAO!
>>>
>>> Now the only question is will you clowns admit I was right all along
>>> or will you just gone on pretending?
>>>
>>> I already know the answer. but hey, I'm giving you clowns a chance to
>>> own up to all your lies and admit you were wrong. Frank in particular.
>>> Any men out there that can admit they screwed-up or still just loud
>>> little boys that like to stamp their feet and scream and yell?
>>>
>>
>>
>> Who ever said there were NO issues with Vista?
>> There are small ones, but they are mostly vastly exaggerated by buffoons
>> like yourself.
>> This Vista release is far more stable than XP at the same point after
>> initial release.
>> Whether you think so or not doesn't matter, as I like Vista.
>> If file copy is 157 milliseconds slower, it doesn't eat at myself like it
>> appears to eat at you.
>> If it is just "pretty eye candy", well I like it, paid $250 for it, and
>> still like it.
>> Period Idiot Albright.
>>
>> You get that Albright?
>>
>> What you think, believe, can link to, can reference to, can read in an
>> article doesn't matter.
>>
>> What lies?
>> Are you paranoid?
>> In a contest?
>> Is this your BIG MOMENT IN LIFE, posting in a ng?
>>
>
>


Good answer.
Shows it's not about software, but premature opinions of Windows.
I wish I was a monkey using Vista...I'd be on Jay Leno.

You really are a Retard. Are you related to Kevin? Just FYI.


"Thai Berry (U.S.)" <> wrote in message
news:470aba5e$...
>> There are small ones
>> This Vista release is far more stable than XP If file copy is 157
>> milliseconds slower
>
> Do to the contents of your last post, I have the privilege to announce to
> you:
>
> CONGRATULATIONS: You just joined a very small but disgusting group of scum
> under-the-rock dweller, vistaboy-monkeys!!
>
> You are the youngest member, now, only 14 years of age.
>
> MAY THE SLIME BE WITH YOU!
>
>
>
>
> "fourteen" <> wrote in message
> news:eb%...
>> "Adam Albright" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:19:34 -0700, "Bill Yanaire" <>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Who really gives a RATS ASS.
>>>
>>> You do. Fanboys care more about what's said about Vista and SP1 then
>>> any rat's ass, THEIR REPUTATION is on the line. So of course the
>>> fanboy crowd will try to poo-poo anything reviewed on this topic if it
>>> confirms many of the things reported here since reading what's said in
>>> reviews makes the fanboy crowd look like the damn fools they are.
>>>
>>> Over a month ago Microsoft announced SP1 was going into beta. Now we
>>> are starting to see reviews of what's changed addressed by the beta.
>>>
>>> OH MY GOD... a lot of the problems the moronic fanboy crowd denied and
>>> kept saying wasn't true or was because the user done something wrong
>>> have now been corrected/changed/fixed/improved by Microsoft including
>>> the slow copy issue. That sure does blow the creditability of fanboys
>>> in general, Frank and a few other special idiots in particular.
>>>
>>> ROTFLMAO!
>>>
>>> Now the only question is will you clowns admit I was right all along
>>> or will you just gone on pretending?
>>>
>>> I already know the answer. but hey, I'm giving you clowns a chance to
>>> own up to all your lies and admit you were wrong. Frank in particular.
>>> Any men out there that can admit they screwed-up or still just loud
>>> little boys that like to stamp their feet and scream and yell?
>>>
>>
>>
>> Who ever said there were NO issues with Vista?
>> There are small ones, but they are mostly vastly exaggerated by buffoons
>> like yourself.
>> This Vista release is far more stable than XP at the same point after
>> initial release.
>> Whether you think so or not doesn't matter, as I like Vista.
>> If file copy is 157 milliseconds slower, it doesn't eat at myself like it
>> appears to eat at you.
>> If it is just "pretty eye candy", well I like it, paid $250 for it, and
>> still like it.
>> Period Idiot Albright.
>>
>> You get that Albright?
>>
>> What you think, believe, can link to, can reference to, can read in an
>> article doesn't matter.
>>
>> What lies?
>> Are you paranoid?
>> In a contest?
>> Is this your BIG MOMENT IN LIFE, posting in a ng?
>>
>
>

hey spanky de monkey

did you actually select jed clampett as a random name???

becuase if you knew who he was you would never use that name on the
internet...

FYFI!


"Jed Clampett" <> wrote in message
news:e%...
> You really are a Retard. Are you related to Kevin? Just FYI.
>
>
> "Thai Berry (U.S.)" <> wrote in message
> news:470aba5e$...
>>> There are small ones
>>> This Vista release is far more stable than XP If file copy is 157
>>> milliseconds slower
>>
>> Do to the contents of your last post, I have the privilege to announce to
>> you:
>>
>> CONGRATULATIONS: You just joined a very small but disgusting group of
>> scum under-the-rock dweller, vistaboy-monkeys!!
>>
>> You are the youngest member, now, only 14 years of age.
>>
>> MAY THE SLIME BE WITH YOU!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "fourteen" <> wrote in message
>> news:eb%...
>>> "Adam Albright" <> wrote in message
>>> news:...
>>>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:19:34 -0700, "Bill Yanaire" <>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Who really gives a RATS ASS.
>>>>
>>>> You do. Fanboys care more about what's said about Vista and SP1 then
>>>> any rat's ass, THEIR REPUTATION is on the line. So of course the
>>>> fanboy crowd will try to poo-poo anything reviewed on this topic if it
>>>> confirms many of the things reported here since reading what's said in
>>>> reviews makes the fanboy crowd look like the damn fools they are.
>>>>
>>>> Over a month ago Microsoft announced SP1 was going into beta. Now we
>>>> are starting to see reviews of what's changed addressed by the beta.
>>>>
>>>> OH MY GOD... a lot of the problems the moronic fanboy crowd denied and
>>>> kept saying wasn't true or was because the user done something wrong
>>>> have now been corrected/changed/fixed/improved by Microsoft including
>>>> the slow copy issue. That sure does blow the creditability of fanboys
>>>> in general, Frank and a few other special idiots in particular.
>>>>
>>>> ROTFLMAO!
>>>>
>>>> Now the only question is will you clowns admit I was right all along
>>>> or will you just gone on pretending?
>>>>
>>>> I already know the answer. but hey, I'm giving you clowns a chance to
>>>> own up to all your lies and admit you were wrong. Frank in particular.
>>>> Any men out there that can admit they screwed-up or still just loud
>>>> little boys that like to stamp their feet and scream and yell?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Who ever said there were NO issues with Vista?
>>> There are small ones, but they are mostly vastly exaggerated by buffoons
>>> like yourself.
>>> This Vista release is far more stable than XP at the same point after
>>> initial release.
>>> Whether you think so or not doesn't matter, as I like Vista.
>>> If file copy is 157 milliseconds slower, it doesn't eat at myself like
>>> it appears to eat at you.
>>> If it is just "pretty eye candy", well I like it, paid $250 for it, and
>>> still like it.
>>> Period Idiot Albright.
>>>
>>> You get that Albright?
>>>
>>> What you think, believe, can link to, can reference to, can read in an
>>> article doesn't matter.
>>>
>>> What lies?
>>> Are you paranoid?
>>> In a contest?
>>> Is this your BIG MOMENT IN LIFE, posting in a ng?
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Do you randomly post rubbish? Because if you knew what you were doing, you
would wipe your PC clean and install Ubuntu.

Just FYI

"Thai Berry (U.S.)" <> wrote in message
news:...
> hey spanky de monkey
>
> did you actually select jed clampett as a random name???
>
> becuase if you knew who he was you would never use that name on the
> internet...
>
> FYFI!
>
>
> "Jed Clampett" <> wrote in message
> news:e%...
>> You really are a Retard. Are you related to Kevin? Just FYI.
>>
>>
>> "Thai Berry (U.S.)" <> wrote in message
>> news:470aba5e$...
>>>> There are small ones
>>>> This Vista release is far more stable than XP If file copy is 157
>>>> milliseconds slower
>>>
>>> Do to the contents of your last post, I have the privilege to announce
>>> to you:
>>>
>>> CONGRATULATIONS: You just joined a very small but disgusting group of
>>> scum under-the-rock dweller, vistaboy-monkeys!!
>>>
>>> You are the youngest member, now, only 14 years of age.
>>>
>>> MAY THE SLIME BE WITH YOU!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "fourteen" <> wrote in message
>>> news:eb%...
>>>> "Adam Albright" <> wrote in message
>>>> news:...
>>>>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:19:34 -0700, "Bill Yanaire" <>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Who really gives a RATS ASS.
>>>>>
>>>>> You do. Fanboys care more about what's said about Vista and SP1 then
>>>>> any rat's ass, THEIR REPUTATION is on the line. So of course the
>>>>> fanboy crowd will try to poo-poo anything reviewed on this topic if it
>>>>> confirms many of the things reported here since reading what's said in
>>>>> reviews makes the fanboy crowd look like the damn fools they are.
>>>>>
>>>>> Over a month ago Microsoft announced SP1 was going into beta. Now we
>>>>> are starting to see reviews of what's changed addressed by the beta.
>>>>>
>>>>> OH MY GOD... a lot of the problems the moronic fanboy crowd denied and
>>>>> kept saying wasn't true or was because the user done something wrong
>>>>> have now been corrected/changed/fixed/improved by Microsoft including
>>>>> the slow copy issue. That sure does blow the creditability of fanboys
>>>>> in general, Frank and a few other special idiots in particular.
>>>>>
>>>>> ROTFLMAO!
>>>>>
>>>>> Now the only question is will you clowns admit I was right all along
>>>>> or will you just gone on pretending?
>>>>>
>>>>> I already know the answer. but hey, I'm giving you clowns a chance to
>>>>> own up to all your lies and admit you were wrong. Frank in particular.
>>>>> Any men out there that can admit they screwed-up or still just loud
>>>>> little boys that like to stamp their feet and scream and yell?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Who ever said there were NO issues with Vista?
>>>> There are small ones, but they are mostly vastly exaggerated by
>>>> buffoons like yourself.
>>>> This Vista release is far more stable than XP at the same point after
>>>> initial release.
>>>> Whether you think so or not doesn't matter, as I like Vista.
>>>> If file copy is 157 milliseconds slower, it doesn't eat at myself like
>>>> it appears to eat at you.
>>>> If it is just "pretty eye candy", well I like it, paid $250 for it, and
>>>> still like it.
>>>> Period Idiot Albright.
>>>>
>>>> You get that Albright?
>>>>
>>>> What you think, believe, can link to, can reference to, can read in an
>>>> article doesn't matter.
>>>>
>>>> What lies?
>>>> Are you paranoid?
>>>> In a contest?
>>>> Is this your BIG MOMENT IN LIFE, posting in a ng?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>