Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista Performance > performance rating and probs

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

performance rating and probs

 
 
kalmike
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-01-2006
what is this performance rating? Is 1 better than 5 ? I am running at a 2 is
that great or not.

Anyways, the real reason I am writing you good people is under this
performance rating it states that I haver performance issues.

I have 3 total but lets start with this one then I move on

drivers are causing windows to start slowly

after viewing details all I see is the following please help me remove
correct these:

ushub.sys
modemcsa.sys
msisci.sys

do i need these for something important? I looked in the device drivers but
dont see them listed there. where do l look for updated ones or better yet
microsoft site search comes up nadda.

help me please i am a performance buff but dont know how to get there LOL
love new things too so new over performance until vista hogs my entire HD

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
usasma
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-02-2006
I"ve run Vista on a Toxhiba laptop with a rating of 1 - it was very painful!

The usbhub is probably your USB controller - if you don't use USB devices
it's probably not necessary

The modem... thingie is for your modem - do you use it?

1) Go to the Vista download site and search for legacy drivers - there was
a package released recently that has fixed some of the problems. I haven't
used it so I can't help you there.

2) Go to the manufacturer of each device's website and look for Vista
drivers there - your motherboard for USB controller updates, etc

Good luck! That's what Beta testing is all about!

- John



"kalmike" wrote:

> what is this performance rating? Is 1 better than 5 ? I am running at a 2 is
> that great or not.
>
> Anyways, the real reason I am writing you good people is under this
> performance rating it states that I haver performance issues.
>
> I have 3 total but lets start with this one then I move on
>
> drivers are causing windows to start slowly
>
> after viewing details all I see is the following please help me remove
> correct these:
>
> ushub.sys
> modemcsa.sys
> msisci.sys
>
> do i need these for something important? I looked in the device drivers but
> dont see them listed there. where do l look for updated ones or better yet
> microsoft site search comes up nadda.
>
> help me please i am a performance buff but dont know how to get there LOL
> love new things too so new over performance until vista hogs my entire HD
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
kalmike
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-03-2006
john
great help but what does the rates mean. which means better 1-5 1 best and
5 worse?

thanks again.

hey as for the drivers all 3 of the probs drvrs slowing me down as I recall
are from Microsoft of all people.

mich

"usasma" wrote:

> I"ve run Vista on a Toxhiba laptop with a rating of 1 - it was very painful!
>
> The usbhub is probably your USB controller - if you don't use USB devices
> it's probably not necessary
>
> The modem... thingie is for your modem - do you use it?
>
> 1) Go to the Vista download site and search for legacy drivers - there was
> a package released recently that has fixed some of the problems. I haven't
> used it so I can't help you there.
>
> 2) Go to the manufacturer of each device's website and look for Vista
> drivers there - your motherboard for USB controller updates, etc
>
> Good luck! That's what Beta testing is all about!
>
> - John
>
>
>
> "kalmike" wrote:
>
> > what is this performance rating? Is 1 better than 5 ? I am running at a 2 is
> > that great or not.
> >
> > Anyways, the real reason I am writing you good people is under this
> > performance rating it states that I haver performance issues.
> >
> > I have 3 total but lets start with this one then I move on
> >
> > drivers are causing windows to start slowly
> >
> > after viewing details all I see is the following please help me remove
> > correct these:
> >
> > ushub.sys
> > modemcsa.sys
> > msisci.sys
> >
> > do i need these for something important? I looked in the device drivers but
> > dont see them listed there. where do l look for updated ones or better yet
> > microsoft site search comes up nadda.
> >
> > help me please i am a performance buff but dont know how to get there LOL
> > love new things too so new over performance until vista hogs my entire HD
> >

 
Reply With Quote
 
wgd
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-03-2006
In article <677279E8-1C1E-4148-BC9C->,
says...
> john
> great help but what does the rates mean. which means better 1-5 1 best and
> 5 worse?
>

No, it is just the opposite. 5 is the best. 1 is the worst. I think you
need at least a 3 to run the Aero Glass UI. Assuming of course, that your
video card (or onboard video) meets the requirements.
 
Reply With Quote
 
kalmike
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-04-2006
finally some great help. Thanks. I am running at a 2 and it appears I have
aero glass appearance. The display settings are at its highest and have
option of intensity ect,

thanks
just goosed me ram up to 2.5G and seems to help but ratings didnt change. To
me its a sucker system to get us to buy more progs and pcs dont ya think?

mich

"wgd" wrote:

> In article <677279E8-1C1E-4148-BC9C->,
> says...
> > john
> > great help but what does the rates mean. which means better 1-5 1 best and
> > 5 worse?
> >

> No, it is just the opposite. 5 is the best. 1 is the worst. I think you
> need at least a 3 to run the Aero Glass UI. Assuming of course, that your
> video card (or onboard video) meets the requirements.
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Marc Nutty
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-07-2006
I do agree, HOWEVER! the ratings for each hardware type are done on a test,
not just because your graphics card is ATI x9999 with 512mb ram lol. so its
prob not best to test it after a lonnnngg gaming session or w/e.

Also, the overall rating is NOT an average. It is the lowest particular
rating rounded DOWN to the nearest 1 lol. So if everything is like 3.4-4.2
except ur free space is like about 2.7 (bit like mine lol) then ur rating is
going to be 2.

Unfortunate? Yes, harsh? yes, however if you manage to get the overall
rating about 3 or even 4, u got a god in ur CPU lol

--
- Nutty -
"kalmike" <> wrote in message
news:E1EF045D-CCC8-487F-A539-...
> finally some great help. Thanks. I am running at a 2 and it appears I have
> aero glass appearance. The display settings are at its highest and have
> option of intensity ect,
>
> thanks
> just goosed me ram up to 2.5G and seems to help but ratings didnt change.
> To
> me its a sucker system to get us to buy more progs and pcs dont ya think?
>
> mich
>
> "wgd" wrote:
>
>> In article <677279E8-1C1E-4148-BC9C->,
>> says...
>> > john
>> > great help but what does the rates mean. which means better 1-5 1
>> > best and
>> > 5 worse?
>> >

>> No, it is just the opposite. 5 is the best. 1 is the worst. I think you
>> need at least a 3 to run the Aero Glass UI. Assuming of course, that your
>> video card (or onboard video) meets the requirements.
>>


 
Reply With Quote
 
JGPG
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-18-2006
i have almost the same problem but my problem is that my vista x86 does not
work propertly on my AMD 64 Athlon works slowly and no matter what i do when
i install it the instalation does not continue until you restart the computer
with the power button.... my mouse get freeze for seconds and still working a
lot slowly the videos looks completelly slow.... someone knows why??? MY
VIDEO CARD IS GEFORCE NVIDIA FX5500

"Marc Nutty" wrote:

> I do agree, HOWEVER! the ratings for each hardware type are done on a test,
> not just because your graphics card is ATI x9999 with 512mb ram lol. so its
> prob not best to test it after a lonnnngg gaming session or w/e.
>
> Also, the overall rating is NOT an average. It is the lowest particular
> rating rounded DOWN to the nearest 1 lol. So if everything is like 3.4-4.2
> except ur free space is like about 2.7 (bit like mine lol) then ur rating is
> going to be 2.
>
> Unfortunate? Yes, harsh? yes, however if you manage to get the overall
> rating about 3 or even 4, u got a god in ur CPU lol
>
> --
> - Nutty -
> "kalmike" <> wrote in message
> news:E1EF045D-CCC8-487F-A539-...
> > finally some great help. Thanks. I am running at a 2 and it appears I have
> > aero glass appearance. The display settings are at its highest and have
> > option of intensity ect,
> >
> > thanks
> > just goosed me ram up to 2.5G and seems to help but ratings didnt change.
> > To
> > me its a sucker system to get us to buy more progs and pcs dont ya think?
> >
> > mich
> >
> > "wgd" wrote:
> >
> >> In article <677279E8-1C1E-4148-BC9C->,
> >> says...
> >> > john
> >> > great help but what does the rates mean. which means better 1-5 1
> >> > best and
> >> > 5 worse?
> >> >
> >> No, it is just the opposite. 5 is the best. 1 is the worst. I think you
> >> need at least a 3 to run the Aero Glass UI. Assuming of course, that your
> >> video card (or onboard video) meets the requirements.
> >>

>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Performance Rating Robert Windows Vista Performance 1 03-16-2008 08:29 PM
Why only Performance Rating 1.0 ? Len Norton Windows Vista Performance 6 09-03-2006 02:46 PM
Overall performance rating - why low? Doodles Malone Windows Vista General Discussion 15 06-29-2006 12:48 PM
Performance rating low link_0587 Windows Vista Performance 1 06-18-2006 09:25 AM
Performance rating Ryan Windows Vista General Discussion 3 06-18-2006 05:57 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59