Whilst I appreciate your reply Stan, it is somewhat akin to gloating that
you are superior.
Whilst I am sure that you are more than able to argue your point to the Nth
degree, there are I am sure many others who would disagree.
I do not really have a point of view.
What I have, I have to deal with, it is too late to start wishing I had
different equipment. I have a problem, I have asked for advice. There is
little point arguing whether 64 bit is worse than 32 bit as is the AMD Intel
argument.
The best advice you give is to wait until someone with knowledge of the
problem suggests a solution.
Nig
"Stan Starinski" <China@stealsUSJobsPatentsSoftwareMusicVideo> wrote in
message news:#5woM#...
> Wait for responses but Just FYI:
> I only use Intel.
> I only use genuine Windows or UNIX for networked labs.
> And I only use prevalent 32-bit client version for normal, "mass-market"
> softwares" such as Office, productivity, communications, etc.
> I use 64-bit only for hard-core floating point intensive softwares such as
> CAD, Image & Video editing, engineering simulations.
>
> Basically you invite problems by violating all above. Don't use AMD,
> don't flirt with 64 bit UNLESS you know 100% your printer driver was
> TESTED to work in 64-bit Windows.
>
> No wmy suggestion is goback to printer mfg's website and check if 64-bit
> driver update is available, and replace yours if available.
>
> If not, wait for more responses.
|
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
