| Home | Register | Members | Search | Windows Vista Tips | File Database | Links |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| |
|
alexB
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It is a little bit thick to go into but perhaps this might be of help.
It is my understanding that you should never sign in as an administrator. If you meant that by using the word "admin" then it might be a problem. All sign ins must be made by ordinary users, HOWEVER. Some users who you consider worthy get a chance to elevate themselves to act as administrators when the circumstances warrant. You do it by including those users in the Group Administrators. Note the plural in here. Then you go around and give those users permissions to see those folders in Vista. If there are quite a few of them (users), never mind. Create a Groups" "My Special Administrators," include those users you consider worthy into that group and go around giving this group the right to access the folders with the rights you consider necessary (full control or partial). However either all of them individually or in aggregate as a group must be members of the group "Administrators." "robinb" <> wrote in message news:6DB0158A-189F-41F9-A84D-... >I have an admin account and a limted user account on Vista home premium > The computer is on a network using the same name in Workgroups. Sharing > is > enabled on the two other computers running windows xp pro and in the > Main > User Folder, 3 folders are set up to share including the "my documents > folder for each user on those computers. Also on the C: drive- I set two > folders called "Robinjunk" and "Downloads" to share > > On the xp computers running xp pro- they see each other and can share the > User Folder and the two folders on c" drive with no problems. > > When on the admin account on the Vista one, I can access the other > computers on these folders but the User folder. Here it tells me > permission is denied. > > If i go on the limted account- here it asks for the username and password > on > the other computers and once given, I can access the User Folder and the > folders that are shared on the networked computers. > > Now if I make another account and give it admin access- try going across > the > network- it goes into the User folder and all three shared folders accross > the network. > > Why won't it give access on the main admin account to the User Folder on > the > other computers accross the network? > > I am totally baffled and I must be missing something. > > Any ideas? > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
robinb
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
no, you do not understand the question.
I only have two user accounts- one has administrator privliges one has limited the one on adminstrator privliges cannot get into the User folder on the xp pro networked computer If I make another User account with Administrative Privliges that User can get in. Why can't the first User account that has Adminstrative Privliges get in? the limited account was tested and the only way they can get in is by putting in the username and password to the other xp computer. But he gets in,,, that is my point. On the User account that has administrator privileges- she cannot get in. She can get into the two files that are on the c drive that are being shared but not the Administrator User Account that is set to share on the xp pro computers. robin "alexB" <> wrote in message news:... > It is a little bit thick to go into but perhaps this might be of help. > > It is my understanding that you should never sign in as an administrator. > If you meant that by using the word "admin" then it might be a problem. > All sign ins must be made by ordinary users, HOWEVER. > > Some users who you consider worthy get a chance to elevate themselves to > act as administrators when the circumstances warrant. You do it by > including those users in the Group Administrators. Note the plural in > here. > > Then you go around and give those users permissions to see those folders > in Vista. If there are quite a few of them (users), never mind. Create a > Groups" "My Special Administrators," include those users you consider > worthy into that group and go around giving this group the right to access > the folders with the rights you consider necessary (full control or > partial). However either all of them individually or in aggregate as a > group must be members of the group "Administrators." > > "robinb" <> wrote in message > news:6DB0158A-189F-41F9-A84D-... >>I have an admin account and a limted user account on Vista home premium >> The computer is on a network using the same name in Workgroups. Sharing >> is >> enabled on the two other computers running windows xp pro and in the >> Main >> User Folder, 3 folders are set up to share including the "my documents >> folder for each user on those computers. Also on the C: drive- I set two >> folders called "Robinjunk" and "Downloads" to share >> >> On the xp computers running xp pro- they see each other and can share the >> User Folder and the two folders on c" drive with no problems. >> >> When on the admin account on the Vista one, I can access the other >> computers on these folders but the User folder. Here it tells me >> permission is denied. >> >> If i go on the limted account- here it asks for the username and password >> on >> the other computers and once given, I can access the User Folder and the >> folders that are shared on the networked computers. >> >> Now if I make another account and give it admin access- try going across >> the >> network- it goes into the User folder and all three shared folders >> accross >> the network. >> >> Why won't it give access on the main admin account to the User Folder on >> the >> other computers accross the network? >> >> I am totally baffled and I must be missing something. >> >> Any ideas? >> > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
alexB
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sorry Robin, it may be blabbering but perhaps every bit helps.
I think the problem may be that the XP is not Vista. Could it be possible that XP is used to the fact that there might be only ONE administrator across the network? Actually I have no idea since XP is out of my mind already but it would be interesting to know if this is the case. Robin, this I just cannot understand: > On the User account that has administrator privileges- she cannot get in. > She can get into the two files that are on the c drive that are being > shared but not the Administrator User Account that is set to share on the > xp pro computers. I think there are two mutually exclusive statements up there. You are saying that "she cannot get in." (the first line) and then: "She can get into the two files that are on the c drive that are being shared" but .. "but not the Administrator User Account ?" what does that mean? You should draw a clear diagram. (1) Account A - administrator privileges in Vista (full rights). Has been defined also in XP under the same name, etc. etc. etc. (2) Account B - adm, limited. In what sense limited, etc, etc, etc. "robinb" <> wrote in message news:%... > no, you do not understand the question. > I only have two user accounts- > one has administrator privliges one has limited > the one on adminstrator privliges cannot get into the User folder on the > xp pro networked computer > If I make another User account with Administrative Privliges that User can > get in. > Why can't the first User account that has Adminstrative Privliges get in? > > the limited account was tested and the only way they can get in is by > putting in the username and password to the other xp computer. But he > gets in,,, that is my point. > > On the User account that has administrator privileges- she cannot get in. > She can get into the two files that are on the c drive that are being > shared but not the Administrator User Account that is set to share on the > xp pro computers. > > robin > > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
robin
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I do not think so because there are 3 administrative users on the 3 xp pros
that are networked. and each computer can get to the one designated Administrative User that is being shared. In Vista the 2nd user account that i set up with administrative authority "sees" and can get into that particular user. The limited account with putting in a username and password (the one on each xp computer) sees it too. The 1st user account that has administrative authority gets into the xp pro machines but cannot get into the designated Administrative User account. If it was on the xp side it would not let any of the Vista user accounts in but it is letting all of them in, just not the main user account which makes no sense because the names are not even close to each other and it is letting it into the two folders that are on the c drive. This is what is so frustating and I cannot figure out what is wrong. robin robin "alexB" <> wrote in message news:%... > Sorry Robin, it may be blabbering but perhaps every bit helps. > > I think the problem may be that the XP is not Vista. Could it be possible > that XP is used to the fact that there might be only ONE administrator > across the network? Actually I have no idea since XP is out of my mind > already but it would be interesting to know if this is the case. > > > Robin, this I just cannot understand: >> On the User account that has administrator privileges- she cannot get in. >> She can get into the two files that are on the c drive that are being >> shared but not the Administrator User Account that is set to share on the >> xp pro computers. > I think there are two mutually exclusive statements up there. You are > saying that "she cannot get in." (the first line) and then: "She can get > into the two files that are on the c drive that are being shared" but .. > "but not the Administrator User Account ?" what does that mean? > > You should draw a clear diagram. > > (1) Account A - administrator privileges in Vista (full rights). Has been > defined also in XP under the same name, etc. etc. etc. > (2) Account B - adm, limited. In what sense limited, etc, etc, etc. > > > "robinb" <> wrote in message > news:%... >> no, you do not understand the question. >> I only have two user accounts- >> one has administrator privliges one has limited >> the one on adminstrator privliges cannot get into the User folder on the >> xp pro networked computer >> If I make another User account with Administrative Privliges that User >> can get in. >> Why can't the first User account that has Adminstrative Privliges get in? >> >> the limited account was tested and the only way they can get in is by >> putting in the username and password to the other xp computer. But he >> gets in,,, that is my point. >> >> On the User account that has administrator privileges- she cannot get in. >> She can get into the two files that are on the c drive that are being >> shared but not the Administrator User Account that is set to share on the >> xp pro computers. >> >> robin >> >> > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
alexB
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
>The 1st user account that has administrative authority gets into the xp pro
>machines but cannot get into the designated Administrative User account. OK, you are not really listening. I suggested that you map a diagram of your accounts in a clear algorithmic type of way to preempt any confusion. You have not done it. Let me try to make some assumptions for you based on the above statement as I see it. You are saying that XP users are fine as far as getting into Vista. It means that they can access any Vista Folder, right? You are not saying that they can actually control the Vista accounts, even admin accounts. You are not saying it, I presume. If you really want an XP user (and administrator on XP machine) to make changes in Vista as a Vista administrator, it is a different aspect. From what you seem to be saying in the quoted statement above I deduce that you want a Vista user with limited admin account to control another Vista user's full admin account in such a way as to make changes in the account set up, etc. Does it sound right? This may not be possible. FYI, this forum is full of know-it-all trolls who badmouth people trying to solve other people's problems in good faith. They are near criminal characters and I was waiting for them to jump in and say: "I do know what you problem is, Robin!" So far we haven't heard that. Anyhow, I will keep trying to help you but keep it in mind that my network experience is limited and I need a much better description as to what your actual account set up it. "robin" <> wrote in message news:%... >I do not think so because there are 3 administrative users on the 3 xp >pros that are networked. and each computer can get to the one designated >Administrative User that is being shared. > In Vista the 2nd user account that i set up with administrative authority > "sees" and can get into that particular user. > The limited account with putting in a username and password (the one on > each xp computer) sees it too. > > The 1st user account that has administrative authority gets into the xp > pro machines but cannot get into the designated Administrative User > account. If it was on the xp side it would not let any of the Vista user > accounts in but it is letting all of them in, just not the main user > account which makes no sense because the names are not even close to each > other and it is letting it into the two folders that are on the c drive. > > This is what is so frustating and I cannot figure out what is wrong. > > robin > > robin > > "alexB" <> wrote in message > news:%... >> Sorry Robin, it may be blabbering but perhaps every bit helps. >> >> I think the problem may be that the XP is not Vista. Could it be possible >> that XP is used to the fact that there might be only ONE administrator >> across the network? Actually I have no idea since XP is out of my mind >> already but it would be interesting to know if this is the case. >> >> >> Robin, this I just cannot understand: >>> On the User account that has administrator privileges- she cannot get >>> in. She can get into the two files that are on the c drive that are >>> being shared but not the Administrator User Account that is set to share >>> on the xp pro computers. >> I think there are two mutually exclusive statements up there. You are >> saying that "she cannot get in." (the first line) and then: "She can get >> into the two files that are on the c drive that are being shared" but .. >> "but not the Administrator User Account ?" what does that mean? >> >> You should draw a clear diagram. >> >> (1) Account A - administrator privileges in Vista (full rights). Has been >> defined also in XP under the same name, etc. etc. etc. >> (2) Account B - adm, limited. In what sense limited, etc, etc, etc. >> >> >> "robinb" <> wrote in message >> news:%... >>> no, you do not understand the question. >>> I only have two user accounts- >>> one has administrator privliges one has limited >>> the one on adminstrator privliges cannot get into the User folder on the >>> xp pro networked computer >>> If I make another User account with Administrative Privliges that User >>> can get in. >>> Why can't the first User account that has Adminstrative Privliges get >>> in? >>> >>> the limited account was tested and the only way they can get in is by >>> putting in the username and password to the other xp computer. But he >>> gets in,,, that is my point. >>> >>> On the User account that has administrator privileges- she cannot get >>> in. She can get into the two files that are on the c drive that are >>> being shared but not the Administrator User Account that is set to share >>> on the xp pro computers. >>> >>> robin >>> >>> >> > > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Robinb
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> > You are saying that XP users are fine as far as getting into Vista. It > means that they can access any Vista Folder, right? You are not saying > that they can actually control the Vista accounts, even admin accounts. > You are not saying it, I presume. If you really want an XP user (and > administrator on XP machine) to make changes in Vista as a Vista > administrator, it is a different aspect. correct > From what you seem to be saying in the quoted statement above I deduce > that you want a Vista user with limited admin account to control another > Vista user's full admin account in such a way as to make changes in the > account set up, etc. > no, I actually do not want the lmited account user to network into the xp pro machines, I was using that only as a test to try to figure out why the Administrative user cannot get into the Administrative User on the xp pro machine filders. > Does it sound right? This may not be possible. > > FYI, this forum is full of know-it-all trolls who badmouth people trying > to solve other people's problems in good faith. They are near criminal > characters and I was waiting for them to jump in and say: "I do know what > you problem is, Robin!" So far we haven't heard that. I understand, I give help on the microsoft security and Windows defender ng and I know what know it all trolls are all about. I know a lot about computers, I teach Windows Vista and XP, I fix them, I build them and I sell them. but for the life of me I am stumped on this one and was looking to see if anyone had an idea why this is happening > > Anyhow, I will keep trying to help you but keep it in mind that my network > experience is limited and I need a much better description as to what your Maybe this will make it easier to understand: 1. 1- computer- running Vista Home Premium- workgroup name "dogs" (dogs is only an example- not the real name) "Lori" (just using that name as an example) is on as Adminstrator- password protected 2. 2 XP Pro computers networked together using the workgroup "dogs" (again dogs is only an example) 1- Michael is the Administrator User on xp pro machine. 1- John is the Administratior user on the other xp pro Michael and John can "see" each other and can access all files that are shared- On both their Administrative My document folder, etc. Michael and John can access all of Lori's files on the Vista Machine Lori cannot access Michael and John's folders- comes up Permisson denied Lori can access two folders on the c drive that are also shared on the 2 xp computers- one called Goodstuff- one called Downloads. Now- I make another Administrator user on Vista and call that Robin (both are password protected) Logg off from Lori and go into Robin Robin can see and use Michael and John's Administrative Folder with no problems. So my question is why can't Lori? same adminstrative access as Robin is this better? robin > > "robin" <> wrote in message > news:%... >>I do not think so because there are 3 administrative users on the 3 xp >>pros that are networked. and each computer can get to the one designated >>Administrative User that is being shared. >> In Vista the 2nd user account that i set up with administrative authority >> "sees" and can get into that particular user. >> The limited account with putting in a username and password (the one on >> each xp computer) sees it too. >> >> The 1st user account that has administrative authority gets into the xp >> pro machines but cannot get into the designated Administrative User >> account. If it was on the xp side it would not let any of the Vista user >> accounts in but it is letting all of them in, just not the main user >> account which makes no sense because the names are not even close to each >> other and it is letting it into the two folders that are on the c drive. >> >> This is what is so frustating and I cannot figure out what is wrong. >> >> robin >> >> robin >> >> "alexB" <> wrote in message >> news:%... >>> Sorry Robin, it may be blabbering but perhaps every bit helps. >>> >>> I think the problem may be that the XP is not Vista. Could it be >>> possible that XP is used to the fact that there might be only ONE >>> administrator across the network? Actually I have no idea since XP is >>> out of my mind already but it would be interesting to know if this is >>> the case. >>> >>> >>> Robin, this I just cannot understand: >>>> On the User account that has administrator privileges- she cannot get >>>> in. She can get into the two files that are on the c drive that are >>>> being shared but not the Administrator User Account that is set to >>>> share on the xp pro computers. >>> I think there are two mutually exclusive statements up there. You are >>> saying that "she cannot get in." (the first line) and then: "She can get >>> into the two files that are on the c drive that are being shared" but .. >>> "but not the Administrator User Account ?" what does that mean? >>> >>> You should draw a clear diagram. >>> >>> (1) Account A - administrator privileges in Vista (full rights). Has >>> been defined also in XP under the same name, etc. etc. etc. >>> (2) Account B - adm, limited. In what sense limited, etc, etc, etc. >>> >>> >>> "robinb" <> wrote in message >>> news:%... >>>> no, you do not understand the question. >>>> I only have two user accounts- >>>> one has administrator privliges one has limited >>>> the one on adminstrator privliges cannot get into the User folder on >>>> the xp pro networked computer >>>> If I make another User account with Administrative Privliges that User >>>> can get in. >>>> Why can't the first User account that has Adminstrative Privliges get >>>> in? >>>> >>>> the limited account was tested and the only way they can get in is by >>>> putting in the username and password to the other xp computer. But he >>>> gets in,,, that is my point. >>>> >>>> On the User account that has administrator privileges- she cannot get >>>> in. She can get into the two files that are on the c drive that are >>>> being shared but not the Administrator User Account that is set to >>>> share on the xp pro computers. >>>> >>>> robin >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
alexB
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Robin, I think you clarified it very nicely. I cannot do it at this moment
but perhaps someone else will pitch in. There are MVPs, I am no one of them. I will definitely try to take another look at this nice configuration later. I just need to focus on it and to do a bit of brainstorming, for about 5 min. and try to help you. I am learning myself. BTW, I was not trying to seek support or endorsement on trolls. It was a message to them. They got it. When it comes to real problems they are nowhere to be seen.All they want is to sell some of their wares for the most part. "Robinb" <> wrote in message news:%... > >> >> You are saying that XP users are fine as far as getting into Vista. It >> means that they can access any Vista Folder, right? You are not saying >> that they can actually control the Vista accounts, even admin accounts. >> You are not saying it, I presume. If you really want an XP user (and >> administrator on XP machine) to make changes in Vista as a Vista >> administrator, it is a different aspect. > > correct > > >> From what you seem to be saying in the quoted statement above I deduce >> that you want a Vista user with limited admin account to control another >> Vista user's full admin account in such a way as to make changes in the >> account set up, etc. >> > > no, I actually do not want the lmited account user to network into the xp > pro machines, I was using that only as a test to try to figure out why > the Administrative user cannot get into the Administrative User on the xp > pro machine filders. > >> Does it sound right? This may not be possible. > > >> >> FYI, this forum is full of know-it-all trolls who badmouth people trying >> to solve other people's problems in good faith. They are near criminal >> characters and I was waiting for them to jump in and say: "I do know what >> you problem is, Robin!" So far we haven't heard that. > > I understand, I give help on the microsoft security and Windows defender > ng and I know what know it all trolls are all about. I know a lot about > computers, I teach Windows Vista and XP, I fix them, I build them and I > sell them. but for the life of me I am stumped on this one and was > looking to see if anyone had an idea why this is happening >> >> Anyhow, I will keep trying to help you but keep it in mind that my >> network experience is limited and I need a much better description as to >> what your > > Maybe this will make it easier to understand: > > 1. 1- computer- running Vista Home Premium- workgroup name "dogs" (dogs > is only an example- not the real name) > "Lori" (just using that name as an example) is on as Adminstrator- > password protected > > 2. 2 XP Pro computers networked together using the workgroup "dogs" > (again dogs is only an example) > 1- Michael is the Administrator User on xp pro machine. 1- John is the > Administratior user on the other xp pro > > Michael and John can "see" each other and can access all files that are > shared- On both their Administrative My document folder, etc. > > Michael and John can access all of Lori's files on the Vista Machine > > Lori cannot access Michael and John's folders- comes up Permisson denied > Lori can access two folders on the c drive that are also shared on the 2 > xp computers- one called Goodstuff- one called Downloads. > > Now- I make another Administrator user on Vista and call that Robin (both > are password protected) > Logg off from Lori and go into Robin > > Robin can see and use Michael and John's Administrative Folder with no > problems. > > So my question is why can't Lori? same adminstrative access as Robin > > is this better? > > robin > >> >> "robin" <> wrote in message >> news:%... >>>I do not think so because there are 3 administrative users on the 3 xp >>>pros that are networked. and each computer can get to the one designated >>>Administrative User that is being shared. >>> In Vista the 2nd user account that i set up with administrative >>> authority "sees" and can get into that particular user. >>> The limited account with putting in a username and password (the one on >>> each xp computer) sees it too. >>> >>> The 1st user account that has administrative authority gets into the xp >>> pro machines but cannot get into the designated Administrative User >>> account. If it was on the xp side it would not let any of the Vista >>> user accounts in but it is letting all of them in, just not the main >>> user account which makes no sense because the names are not even close >>> to each other and it is letting it into the two folders that are on the >>> c drive. >>> >>> This is what is so frustating and I cannot figure out what is wrong. >>> >>> robin >>> >>> robin >>> >>> "alexB" <> wrote in message >>> news:%... >>>> Sorry Robin, it may be blabbering but perhaps every bit helps. >>>> >>>> I think the problem may be that the XP is not Vista. Could it be >>>> possible that XP is used to the fact that there might be only ONE >>>> administrator across the network? Actually I have no idea since XP is >>>> out of my mind already but it would be interesting to know if this is >>>> the case. >>>> >>>> >>>> Robin, this I just cannot understand: >>>>> On the User account that has administrator privileges- she cannot get >>>>> in. She can get into the two files that are on the c drive that are >>>>> being shared but not the Administrator User Account that is set to >>>>> share on the xp pro computers. >>>> I think there are two mutually exclusive statements up there. You are >>>> saying that "she cannot get in." (the first line) and then: "She can >>>> get into the two files that are on the c drive that are being shared" >>>> but .. "but not the Administrator User Account ?" what does that mean? >>>> >>>> You should draw a clear diagram. >>>> >>>> (1) Account A - administrator privileges in Vista (full rights). Has >>>> been defined also in XP under the same name, etc. etc. etc. >>>> (2) Account B - adm, limited. In what sense limited, etc, etc, etc. >>>> >>>> >>>> "robinb" <> wrote in message >>>> news:%... >>>>> no, you do not understand the question. >>>>> I only have two user accounts- >>>>> one has administrator privliges one has limited >>>>> the one on adminstrator privliges cannot get into the User folder on >>>>> the xp pro networked computer >>>>> If I make another User account with Administrative Privliges that User >>>>> can get in. >>>>> Why can't the first User account that has Adminstrative Privliges get >>>>> in? >>>>> >>>>> the limited account was tested and the only way they can get in is by >>>>> putting in the username and password to the other xp computer. But he >>>>> gets in,,, that is my point. >>>>> >>>>> On the User account that has administrator privileges- she cannot get >>>>> in. She can get into the two files that are on the c drive that are >>>>> being shared but not the Administrator User Account that is set to >>>>> share on the xp pro computers. >>>>> >>>>> robin >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
alexB
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
>Lori cannot access Michael and John's folders- comes up Permisson denied
>Lori can access two folders on the c drive that are also shared on the 2 xp >computers- one called Goodstuff- one called Downloads. >Now- I make another Administrator user on Vista and call that Robin (both >are password protected) >Logg off from Lori and go into Robin >Robin can see and use Michael and John's Administrative Folder with no >problems. >So my question is why can't Lori? same adminstrative access as Robin >is this better? Definitely, much, much better. It looks like you have TWO admin accounts on Vista with the SAME level of privilege and the first one cannot use some of the XP folders but the second one can. Right? If this is true, then why don't you do the following: (disclaimer: I am not sure you will be able to understand why this is happening but perhaps you will solve the problem "mindlessly" and forget about it). Go to Robin in Vista, click on the problematic folders in XP, Properties>>Security Tab>> Edit>> Add>> add Lori to the list of users/groups. Give Lori permissions you want (full rights or whatnot on the way back>> Click Apply and forget about the problem ![]() Now the happy ending may not be in the offing, actually. We do not have a clear understanding why it is happening but this may as well work. It is what I would call "workaround."Would you try it? If I still do not understand you situation correctly, take another stab. Come back and report, especially if the problem is still there. "Robinb" <> wrote in message news:%... > >> >> You are saying that XP users are fine as far as getting into Vista. It >> means that they can access any Vista Folder, right? You are not saying >> that they can actually control the Vista accounts, even admin accounts. >> You are not saying it, I presume. If you really want an XP user (and >> administrator on XP machine) to make changes in Vista as a Vista >> administrator, it is a different aspect. > > correct > > >> From what you seem to be saying in the quoted statement above I deduce >> that you want a Vista user with limited admin account to control another >> Vista user's full admin account in such a way as to make changes in the >> account set up, etc. >> > > no, I actually do not want the lmited account user to network into the xp > pro machines, I was using that only as a test to try to figure out why > the Administrative user cannot get into the Administrative User on the xp > pro machine filders. > >> Does it sound right? This may not be possible. > > >> >> FYI, this forum is full of know-it-all trolls who badmouth people trying >> to solve other people's problems in good faith. They are near criminal >> characters and I was waiting for them to jump in and say: "I do know what >> you problem is, Robin!" So far we haven't heard that. > > I understand, I give help on the microsoft security and Windows defender > ng and I know what know it all trolls are all about. I know a lot about > computers, I teach Windows Vista and XP, I fix them, I build them and I > sell them. but for the life of me I am stumped on this one and was > looking to see if anyone had an idea why this is happening >> >> Anyhow, I will keep trying to help you but keep it in mind that my >> network experience is limited and I need a much better description as to >> what your > > Maybe this will make it easier to understand: > > 1. 1- computer- running Vista Home Premium- workgroup name "dogs" (dogs > is only an example- not the real name) > "Lori" (just using that name as an example) is on as Adminstrator- > password protected > > 2. 2 XP Pro computers networked together using the workgroup "dogs" > (again dogs is only an example) > 1- Michael is the Administrator User on xp pro machine. 1- John is the > Administratior user on the other xp pro > > Michael and John can "see" each other and can access all files that are > shared- On both their Administrative My document folder, etc. > > Michael and John can access all of Lori's files on the Vista Machine > > Lori cannot access Michael and John's folders- comes up Permisson denied > Lori can access two folders on the c drive that are also shared on the 2 > xp computers- one called Goodstuff- one called Downloads. > > Now- I make another Administrator user on Vista and call that Robin (both > are password protected) > Logg off from Lori and go into Robin > > Robin can see and use Michael and John's Administrative Folder with no > problems. > > So my question is why can't Lori? same adminstrative access as Robin > > is this better? > > robin > >> >> "robin" <> wrote in message >> news:%... >>>I do not think so because there are 3 administrative users on the 3 xp >>>pros that are networked. and each computer can get to the one designated >>>Administrative User that is being shared. >>> In Vista the 2nd user account that i set up with administrative >>> authority "sees" and can get into that particular user. >>> The limited account with putting in a username and password (the one on >>> each xp computer) sees it too. >>> >>> The 1st user account that has administrative authority gets into the xp >>> pro machines but cannot get into the designated Administrative User >>> account. If it was on the xp side it would not let any of the Vista >>> user accounts in but it is letting all of them in, just not the main >>> user account which makes no sense because the names are not even close >>> to each other and it is letting it into the two folders that are on the >>> c drive. >>> >>> This is what is so frustating and I cannot figure out what is wrong. >>> >>> robin >>> >>> robin >>> >>> "alexB" <> wrote in message >>> news:%... >>>> Sorry Robin, it may be blabbering but perhaps every bit helps. >>>> >>>> I think the problem may be that the XP is not Vista. Could it be >>>> possible that XP is used to the fact that there might be only ONE >>>> administrator across the network? Actually I have no idea since XP is >>>> out of my mind already but it would be interesting to know if this is >>>> the case. >>>> >>>> >>>> Robin, this I just cannot understand: >>>>> On the User account that has administrator privileges- she cannot get >>>>> in. She can get into the two files that are on the c drive that are >>>>> being shared but not the Administrator User Account that is set to >>>>> share on the xp pro computers. >>>> I think there are two mutually exclusive statements up there. You are >>>> saying that "she cannot get in." (the first line) and then: "She can >>>> get into the two files that are on the c drive that are being shared" >>>> but .. "but not the Administrator User Account ?" what does that mean? >>>> >>>> You should draw a clear diagram. >>>> >>>> (1) Account A - administrator privileges in Vista (full rights). Has >>>> been defined also in XP under the same name, etc. etc. etc. >>>> (2) Account B - adm, limited. In what sense limited, etc, etc, etc. >>>> >>>> >>>> "robinb" <> wrote in message >>>> news:%... >>>>> no, you do not understand the question. >>>>> I only have two user accounts- >>>>> one has administrator privliges one has limited >>>>> the one on adminstrator privliges cannot get into the User folder on >>>>> the xp pro networked computer >>>>> If I make another User account with Administrative Privliges that User >>>>> can get in. >>>>> Why can't the first User account that has Adminstrative Privliges get >>>>> in? >>>>> >>>>> the limited account was tested and the only way they can get in is by >>>>> putting in the username and password to the other xp computer. But he >>>>> gets in,,, that is my point. >>>>> >>>>> On the User account that has administrator privileges- she cannot get >>>>> in. She can get into the two files that are on the c drive that are >>>>> being shared but not the Administrator User Account that is set to >>>>> share on the xp pro computers. >>>>> >>>>> robin >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
robinb
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> > It looks like you have TWO admin accounts on Vista with the SAME level of > privilege and the first one cannot use some of the XP folders but the > second one can. Right? Right > > If this is true, then why don't you do the following: (disclaimer: I am > not sure you will be able to understand why this is happening but perhaps > you will solve the problem "mindlessly" and forget about it). > > Go to Robin in Vista, click on the problematic folders in XP, > Properties>>Security Tab>> Edit>> Add>> add Lori to the list of > users/groups. Give Lori permissions you want (full rights or whatnot on > the way back>> Click Apply and forget about the problem ![]() This way i would have to add Robin as a Admin user on XP- I know that is the work around but I want more to figure out why on the vista why one User that can get onto the XP Admin user accounts and why one cannot. I tried going through your way and it will not work. It is very strange that one can and one cannot. Neither one of them have permisson now in xp- that folder is shared across the network for administrator use only robin > > Now the happy ending may not be in the offing, actually. We do not have a > clear understanding why it is happening but this may as well work. It is > what I would call "workaround."Would you try it? > > If I still do not understand you situation correctly, take another stab. > > Come back and report, especially if the problem is still there. > > "Robinb" <> wrote in message > news:%... >> >>> >>> You are saying that XP users are fine as far as getting into Vista. It >>> means that they can access any Vista Folder, right? You are not saying >>> that they can actually control the Vista accounts, even admin accounts. >>> You are not saying it, I presume. If you really want an XP user (and >>> administrator on XP machine) to make changes in Vista as a Vista >>> administrator, it is a different aspect. >> >> correct >> >> >>> From what you seem to be saying in the quoted statement above I deduce >>> that you want a Vista user with limited admin account to control another >>> Vista user's full admin account in such a way as to make changes in the >>> account set up, etc. >>> >> >> no, I actually do not want the lmited account user to network into the xp >> pro machines, I was using that only as a test to try to figure out why >> the Administrative user cannot get into the Administrative User on the xp >> pro machine filders. >> >>> Does it sound right? This may not be possible. >> >> >>> >>> FYI, this forum is full of know-it-all trolls who badmouth people trying >>> to solve other people's problems in good faith. They are near criminal >>> characters and I was waiting for them to jump in and say: "I do know >>> what you problem is, Robin!" So far we haven't heard that. >> >> I understand, I give help on the microsoft security and Windows defender >> ng and I know what know it all trolls are all about. I know a lot about >> computers, I teach Windows Vista and XP, I fix them, I build them and I >> sell them. but for the life of me I am stumped on this one and was >> looking to see if anyone had an idea why this is happening >>> >>> Anyhow, I will keep trying to help you but keep it in mind that my >>> network experience is limited and I need a much better description as to >>> what your >> >> Maybe this will make it easier to understand: >> >> 1. 1- computer- running Vista Home Premium- workgroup name "dogs" (dogs >> is only an example- not the real name) >> "Lori" (just using that name as an example) is on as Adminstrator- >> password protected >> >> 2. 2 XP Pro computers networked together using the workgroup "dogs" >> (again dogs is only an example) >> 1- Michael is the Administrator User on xp pro machine. 1- John is the >> Administratior user on the other xp pro >> >> Michael and John can "see" each other and can access all files that are >> shared- On both their Administrative My document folder, etc. >> >> Michael and John can access all of Lori's files on the Vista Machine >> >> Lori cannot access Michael and John's folders- comes up Permisson denied >> Lori can access two folders on the c drive that are also shared on the 2 >> xp computers- one called Goodstuff- one called Downloads. >> >> Now- I make another Administrator user on Vista and call that Robin (both >> are password protected) >> Logg off from Lori and go into Robin >> >> Robin can see and use Michael and John's Administrative Folder with no >> problems. >> >> So my question is why can't Lori? same adminstrative access as Robin >> >> is this better? >> >> robin >> >>> >>> "robin" <> wrote in message >>> news:%... >>>>I do not think so because there are 3 administrative users on the 3 xp >>>>pros that are networked. and each computer can get to the one designated >>>>Administrative User that is being shared. >>>> In Vista the 2nd user account that i set up with administrative >>>> authority "sees" and can get into that particular user. >>>> The limited account with putting in a username and password (the one on >>>> each xp computer) sees it too. >>>> >>>> The 1st user account that has administrative authority gets into the xp >>>> pro machines but cannot get into the designated Administrative User >>>> account. If it was on the xp side it would not let any of the Vista >>>> user accounts in but it is letting all of them in, just not the main >>>> user account which makes no sense because the names are not even close >>>> to each other and it is letting it into the two folders that are on the >>>> c drive. >>>> >>>> This is what is so frustating and I cannot figure out what is wrong. >>>> >>>> robin >>>> >>>> robin >>>> >>>> "alexB" <> wrote in message >>>> news:%... >>>>> Sorry Robin, it may be blabbering but perhaps every bit helps. >>>>> >>>>> I think the problem may be that the XP is not Vista. Could it be >>>>> possible that XP is used to the fact that there might be only ONE >>>>> administrator across the network? Actually I have no idea since XP is >>>>> out of my mind already but it would be interesting to know if this is >>>>> the case. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Robin, this I just cannot understand: >>>>>> On the User account that has administrator privileges- she cannot get >>>>>> in. She can get into the two files that are on the c drive that are >>>>>> being shared but not the Administrator User Account that is set to >>>>>> share on the xp pro computers. >>>>> I think there are two mutually exclusive statements up there. You are >>>>> saying that "she cannot get in." (the first line) and then: "She can >>>>> get into the two files that are on the c drive that are being shared" >>>>> but .. "but not the Administrator User Account ?" what does that mean? >>>>> >>>>> You should draw a clear diagram. >>>>> >>>>> (1) Account A - administrator privileges in Vista (full rights). Has >>>>> been defined also in XP under the same name, etc. etc. etc. >>>>> (2) Account B - adm, limited. In what sense limited, etc, etc, etc. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "robinb" <> wrote in message >>>>> news:%... >>>>>> no, you do not understand the question. >>>>>> I only have two user accounts- >>>>>> one has administrator privliges one has limited >>>>>> the one on adminstrator privliges cannot get into the User folder on >>>>>> the xp pro networked computer >>>>>> If I make another User account with Administrative Privliges that >>>>>> User can get in. >>>>>> Why can't the first User account that has Adminstrative Privliges get >>>>>> in? >>>>>> >>>>>> the limited account was tested and the only way they can get in is by >>>>>> putting in the username and password to the other xp computer. But >>>>>> he gets in,,, that is my point. >>>>>> >>>>>> On the User account that has administrator privileges- she cannot get >>>>>> in. She can get into the two files that are on the c drive that are >>>>>> being shared but not the Administrator User Account that is set to >>>>>> share on the xp pro computers. >>>>>> >>>>>> robin >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Permissions problem | Frank M. Greco | Windows Vista General Discussion | 12 | 10-19-2007 10:18 PM |
| Permissions problem? | Nicholas Hall | Windows Vista General Discussion | 1 | 05-09-2007 02:08 PM |
| Permissions problem? | Nicholas Hall | Windows Vista Installation | 1 | 05-09-2007 02:08 PM |
| permissions problem? | Nicholas Hall | Windows Vista File Management | 1 | 05-07-2007 09:02 PM |
| Permissions Problem | Neal Duitz | Windows Vista General Discussion | 10 | 03-12-2006 06:42 PM |
Forum Software Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc. |



Linear Mode

