"...but does not tell you if it is a safe operation."
It is not supposed to, nothing but the user can can make that
determination.
Did you do something to initiate the program?
If not, deny UAC is the only reasonable answer.
"...shifting the total lack of security in Vista onto the
unsophisticated end-user."
Not at all, instead if gives control to the user where control
belongs.
Now it is more difficult for malware to execute.
The user needs to educate him/her self on what they are doing so they
can respond appropriately.
All end users are not "unsophisticated", those that are need to learn
safe computing just like safe operating practices need to be learned
for most all technologies.
For most UAC is not an issue.
If you see UAC often, perhaps the cause is poorly written or older
programs.
I saw UAC a lot shortly after Vista installation but now I rarely see
it.
--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org
"nsag" <> wrote in message
news:C878DCA3-EF00-4F09-8CC6-...
> You will get more out of sniffing the rear end of a horse then by
> reading the UAC warning.
> At least the former will clearly provide you with relevant
> information. The latter simply exercises your index finger and
> generates additional wear on the left button of your mouse.
> UAC is a complete fake and waste of time.
> UAC asks if you want to let an operation proceed but does not tell
> you if it is a safe operation.
> This is Microsoft's way of shifting the total lack of security in
> Vista onto the unsophisticated end-user.
> The existence of UAC is a testament to the consumer antipathy of
> Microsoft corporate culture.
> Come to think of it, so is Vista.
>
>