Todd,
Thank you for your input and your speedy response. At this point I've tested
SMTP with ports 25, 587, and 465 without any luck at this point.
With the Q/Verizon I used the same configuration, IMAP/SMTP, without any
issues.
Sounds like it is time for a call to AT&T to see if there are any "gothchas"
that I need to be aware of with their network.
Kind Regards,
--
Colin M. McGroarty, MCSE, MCSA, MCP+I
"Todd Allcock" <> wrote in message
news:Zu%Ii.10325$.. .
> At 21 Sep 2007 20:38:00 -0500 wrote:
>
>> I have an AT&T 8525 (recent purchase / wireless carrier change) and
>> get the following error when attempting to send email via an IMAP
> account:
>>
>> The message(s) could not be sent.
>> Check that you have network coverage and that your account
>> information is correct.
>> Then try sending again.
>
>
> Two things can cause that error- the carrier blocking the connection
> or the e-mail server blocking it.
>
> You said you were using port 25- are you SURE? Doesn't SSL SMPT
> often use 587 these days? (My IMAP server does, but thankfully
> allows 25 as a "backup" since my carrier, T-Mobile, blocks 587!)
>
>> The troublesome account uses IMAP to connect to an Exchange server
>> and requires SSL for SMTP traffic.
>>
>> The fact that one IMAP/SMTP account functions correctly tells me
>> that port 25 is open.
>
> Why not force 25 in your setup to be sure (for the outgoing server
> setting append it with :25, i.e. "smtp.myserver.com:25") If that
> doesn't work, force 587 with :587 (if your carrier and server support
> it.)
>
>
>> I recently changed from Verizon to AT&T and was formerly using a
>> Motorola Q to connect to the Exchange server that I'm now having
>> trouble with and was able to function without issue.
>
> Did you connect via Activesync push, or IMAP with the Q?
>
>> I've tried a number of configuration
>> permutations (there are only a few to really try) and have had no
>> success. Any suggestions would be welcome.
>
> You might check with AT&T and see if they support SSL SMTP. I know
> they offer an alternative SMTP servier (cmwx.com, IIRC) that would
> allow you to send your e-mail, but that obviously wouldn't show up on
> your Exchange account's "sent" folder which you'd likely prefer.
>
>
> Good luck!
>
>
> --
>
> "I don't need my cell phone to play video games or take pictures
> or double as a Walkie-Talkie; I just need it to work. Thanks for
> all the bells and whistles, but I could communicate better with
> ACTUAL bells and whistles." -Bill Maher 9/25/2003
>