On Sep 8, 1:56 pm, luisortizh...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Sep 7, 10:05 pm, "Lt. Stardust" <stard...@thespamzone.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:...
>
> > > ____/ Kier on Friday 07 September 2007 17:57 : \____
>
> > >> On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:26:42 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
>
> > >>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> espoused:
> > >>>> ____/ Kier on Thursday 06 September 2007 18:15 : \____
>
> > >>>>> On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:02:39 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
>
> > >>>>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> espoused:
> > >>>>>>> ____/ Mark Kent on Thursday 06 September 2007 12:56 : \____
>
> > >>>>>>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> espoused:
> > >>>>>>>>> Microsoft Paid Lobbyist $160,000
>
> > >>>>>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
> > >>>>>>>>>| Microsoft Paid Paid Bingham McCutchen $160,000 to Lobby Federal
> > >>>>>>>>>Gov't
> > >>>>>>>>>| in First Half of 2007
> > >>>>>>>>> `----
>
> > >>>>>>>>>http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070905/micro...ying.html?.v=1
>
> > >>>>>>>> And we still allow this to happen? This is outrageous, and has no
> > >>>>>>>> place in a real democracy, or, for that matter, a constitutional
> > >>>>>>>> monarchy.
>
> > >>>>>>> Exactly! Finally, someone who agrees that this is a disgusting and
> > >>>>>>> anti-democratic practise (only made legal by those who lobby in
> > >>>>>>> favour
> > >>>>>>> of lobbying, or those paying lawmakers to write the law). It's
> > >>>>>>> shredding
> > >>>>>>> democracy to pieces. One must wonder how much of that $160,000 (for
> > >>>>>>> 6
> > >>>>>>> months) Bingham McCutchen just tossed onto some senator's bank
> > >>>>>>> account.
> > >>>>>>> Heck. He may have bought Mr. Senator a session with a dozen hookers.
>
> > >>>>>>> As Ghost says, welcome to the New World Order.
>
> > >>>>>> Oh, I've been worried about lobbying for a few years now, I'm merely
> > >>>>>> becoming ever more concerned that it's destroying what was a vibrant
> > >>>>>> democracy.
>
> > >>>>>> Perhaps we need a move to PR to put a stop to this kind of thing? If
> > >>>>>> our governments were more representative of the views of the
> > >>>>>> populous,
> > >>>>>> then maybe they'd be taken more seriously by the population at large.
> > >>>>>> On the other hand, since most people seem to watch east enders, pop
> > >>>>>> idol, big brother and so on, maybe we could have Stalin running
> > >>>>>> things
> > >>>>>> and nobody would notice. Or a horse, maybe. Oh yeah, the yanks have
> > >>>>>> Bush, and nobody seems to have noticed...
>
> > >>>>> If that tinfoil hat of yours was any tighter, you'd suffocate. Come
> > >>>>> back
> > >>>>> down to Earth for a while, man, and maybe the oxygen will revive your
> > >>>>> common-sense.
>
> > >>>> You're either in denial or fooled if you feel this way. This isn't
> > >>>> anything
> > >>>> new (the corruption at the top), but the proportion of it (and the
> > >>>> visibility that the Internet gives it) cannot be ignored. All this
> > >>>> corruption is a case of stealing for the benefit of the wealthy. It's
> > >>>> also
> > >>>> a matter of restriction and punishment, which is why Free software is
> > >>>> so
> > >>>> crucial to the digital age we're entering.
>
> > >>> It's kier - as you're not a troll, you get an attack. If you were a
>
> > >> You're a liar, Mark. Oh, and my name is Kier - captital K.
>
> > >>> troll and had said the above, he'd be arguing. To put this another way,
> > >>> *you* just got trolled by kier.
>
> > >> Bullshit. I'm just sick of reading paranoid nonsense. Healty skepticism
> > >> but this kind of stuff is more than that, and it's foolish and IMO
> > >> dangerous.
>
> > >> Seeing conspiracy and corruption everywhere you look is not healthy. Try
> > >> for a more balanced view.
>
> > > You also called Rex a nutter. I took offence in this.
>
> > Anyone, Rex included, who claims that a major defence contractor like Martin
> > Marietta broke into his "high school locker" and stole his notebook and then
> > used that to build military weapons is much worse than a nutter. Calling
> > psycho lunatics like this a "nutter" is being far kinder than these
> > screw-balls deserve.
>
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com-Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Rex Ballard?
> Isn't that the guy from comp.os.linux.advocacy that runs around in a
> dress giving oral sex to bartenders?
>
> http://tinyurl.com/yq4oxn
> Yes I believe that is him.
>
> So now he is claiming that technical secrets were stolen from his high
> school locker?
>
> He sounds like another usenet kook who can join Roy Schestowitz and
> Mark Kent.
> Maybe they can have a 3-some?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
****!!!
I just googled Rex Ballard in groups and on the net and he makes Roy
Schestowitz and Mark Kent look normal!!
What a friggen usenet kook if ever there was one.
Between crossdressing for Linux and having ones testicles removed for
Linux I don't know which one is worse.
I don't see much advocacy in comp.os.linux.advocacy, but it is one
hell of a funny froup to read.
Hysterical in fact.
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
