I do both ways and am quite comfortable with both. My concern was mixing
top- and bottom-posting in same conversation. Just take a look at mess
below.
--
Alexander Suhovey
"Peter Foldes" <> wrote in message
news:...
very old and long debate top\bottom posting. I do as you see
--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
"Alexander Suhovey" <> wrote in message
news:CF451C50-E7E5-490F-9958-...
> "Colin Barnhorst" <> wrote in message
> news:%...
>> "Michael Jennings" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>> "Shenan Stanley" <> wrote in message
>>> news:...
>>>> bjackson445 wrote:
>>>>> Microsoft's support site...
>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917607
>>>>>
>>>>> claims that Vista will not include support for Windows "HLP" files.
>>>>> For anyone out there who has any version of 32-bit Vista (Beta, RC1,
>>>>> etc.) have you had any problems running *.hlp files?
> [...]
>> The are not supported in Vista.
>
> Colin,
>
> Not to attack you personally, but you should've following original thread
> posting order. It was bottom-post and you created a mess by
> top-post-replying to it. It is really a pain to follow a thread that has a
> mix of top- and bottom-posts.
>
> For anyone concerned - it is quite easy to fix the mess if you catch first
> reply in wrong order - just move it up/down when you reply to the thread.
>
> --
> Alexander Suhovey
>
>