Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Server > Windows Small Business Server > Re: Cached credentials on shared folders

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Re: Cached credentials on shared folders

 
 
kj [SBS MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-22-2010
yaro137 wrote:
> Not sure if this is the right group for my question as the problem
> actually occurs in a branch office that runs Server 2k8 standard on a
> member server but the DC in the head office runs SBS2k8.
> While the VPN link goes down users can't access shared folders on the
> server even though they can log on. Does it have something to do with
> GPOs?
> yaro


No it has to do with Kerberos (tickets).

--
/kj


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
kj [SBS MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-22-2010
yaro137 wrote:
> On 22 July, 17:12, "kj [SBS MVP]" <KevinJ....@SPAMFREE.gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> yaro137 wrote:
>>> Not sure if this is the right group for my question as the problem
>>> actually occurs in a branch office that runs Server 2k8 standard on
>>> a member server but the DC in the head office runs SBS2k8.
>>> While the VPN link goes down users can't access shared folders on
>>> the server even though they can log on. Does it have something to
>>> do with GPOs?
>>> yaro

>>
>> No it has to do with Kerberos (tickets).
>>
>> --
>> /kj

>
> Is there a way then to make it work when the connection to the DC
> fails?
> Thanks
> yaro


You can open the shares, you can have the users access the branch server
with branch server local accounts, or you can put a second dc at the branch.

Or improve the reliability of the SBS server connectivity, which would be
the preferred choice.


--
/kj


 
Reply With Quote
 
Anteaus
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-24-2010
My ten cents worth would be that no VPN is reliable enough to make an office
totally dependent on it for logon. Unless you can afford a leased line you
should avoid domino-effect scenarios.

The question here is whether you need to manage the users from the central
location, or whether the small amount of extra work in maintaining separate
useraccounts would be preferable to creating an SPOF which can bring both
sites down in one fell swoop. I would argue that resilience is more important.

It's either that or you need to ditch the SBS.

"yaro137" wrote:


> > You can open the shares, you can have the users access the branch server
> > with branch server local accounts, or you can put a second dc at the branch.
> >
> > Or improve the reliability of the SBS server connectivity, which would be
> > the preferred choice.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shared folders on windows server 2003 Gilberto Windows Server 0 05-18-2010 03:07 PM
Copying Shared folders and retaining share and file permissions Bry M Server Networking 7 03-24-2010 01:12 PM
Re: Users Shared Folders Merv Porter Windows Small Business Server 0 12-24-2009 12:02 AM
Using Storage Folders Instead of Default Folders Peter Dryton Windows Live Mail 9 10-26-2009 12:21 PM
Removing "Reader" shared access to folders? MarkF Windows Vista Administration 2 04-07-2007 09:06 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59