Re: Cluster with DFSR

You can let the servers at the main site replicate with the remote servers.
I wouldn't think a cluster in the main site would be necessary.


hth
DDS

<> wrote in message
news:ddd29cc1-5787-4231-add9-...
> Hi all,
> I got multisites with my architecture ..
> 2 servers DFS-R on the main site and 1 dfsr on each distant site ( 4
> sites ) ...
> For the moment, on the main site, the 2 server are indepedant, just
> replicate by DFSR on local storage ...
>
> Is it possible to install a cluster with this 2 servers, ans let
> replicate to the others site by DFSR ?
>
> Thanks a lot for your help
> Best regards

> MainServer1 replicate integrally with Mainserver2 by LAN connection
> but for example DistantServer1 replicate only with Mainserver1 and
> after Mainserver1 replicate with mainserver2 ...

I'm not following what you are saying in this paragraph.

Mserver1 replicates "integrally" with Mserver2. What does that mean?


> but for example DistantServer1 replicate only with Mainserver1 and
> after Mainserver1 replicate with mainserver2

Maybe i'm not following you correctly but why can't the distant servers
replicate with Mserver2? Why is Mserver1 in the mix?


DDS

<> wrote in message
news:81bfa61d-01b6-490f-b6d0-...
> On 5 mai, 15:20, "Danny Sanders" <dsand...@NOSPAMbrakesplus.com>
> wrote:
>> You can let the servers at the main site replicate with the remote
>> servers.
>> I wouldn't think a cluster in the main site would be necessary.
>>
>> hth
>> DDS
>>
>> <a...@mackow.org> wrote in message
>>
>> news:ddd29cc1-5787-4231-add9-...
>>
>>
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> > I got multisites with my architecture ..
>> > 2 servers DFS-R on the main site and 1 dfsr on each distant site ( 4
>> > sites ) ...
>> > For the moment, on the main site, the 2 server are indepedant, just
>> > replicate by DFSR on local storage ...
>>
>> > Is it possible to install a cluster with this 2 servers, ans let
>> > replicate to the others site by DFSR ?
>>
>> > Thanks a lot for your help
>> > Best regards
>
> Thanks for your help ...
> But in fact i got 2 servers on the main site : MainServer1 and
> MainServer2 and 4 distant servers DistantServer1 DistantServer2
> DistantServer3 DistantServer4.
> MainServer1 replicate integrally with Mainserver2 by LAN connection
> but for example DistantServer1 replicate only with Mainserver1 and
> after Mainserver1 replicate with mainserver2 ... So in my example,
> Mainserver1 is down .. There is no replication betwenn Mainserver2 and
> DistantServer1 ...
>
> That's why i am thinking about a cluster, 2 2008R2 in cluster who will
> be the dfs HUB ...
> I keep the security by 2 servers on the main site and I optimize the
> HA ..
>
> What do you think about that ?