Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Server > Server Networking > Re: DHCP relay agent or Multiple Subnet

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Re: DHCP relay agent or Multiple Subnet

 
 
Ace Fekay [MCT]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-03-2009

"herba98" <> wrote in message
news:135ad270-af65-48e7-9553-...
> Hi friends, I need to connect 3 office and I wish to use the same
> subnet (192.168.1.x) on every site but define different range of
> available IPs for a rapid identification of each site. Every site (2)
> will connect to the headquarter (1) using a VPN over ADSL... but I'm
> not sure if:
>
> 1) Should I use a DHCP server on headquarter and config relay agent on
> each remote site
>
> 2) Should I config a local DHCP server on each site (all 3) using the
> same subnet and define different "exclusion range" on each server for
> a specifig range per site.
>
> 3) Should I use a different subnet (.1.x, .2.x, .3.x) on each site and
> define a superscope? but all computers can connect to other in a
> different subnet? or will need to config RRAS to define paths?
>
> thanks in advance for your help
>
> HB




1) That depends on how many users at the remote offices. If more than 10,
it's recommended to place a DC/GC/DNS server at that location, as well as
make it a DHCP server. If only one or two users, and they are part of the
domain, then a relay agent would be better off. Keep in mind with a relay
agent, it will require either another server at that location anyway, or use
your VPN/firewall appliance if it supports that feature (some routers call
it an 'IP helper). By the way, those Linksys, Dlinks, etc, are not what you
want for VPN tunnels between locations. Look into the Cisco ASA5505. Nice
units.

2) & 3) You MUST use different subnets for each office. There is no way
possible that you can connect multiple offices if they have identical
subnets. I suggest to pick a subnet that is not in use by home retail
routers, such as 192.168.0.0 or 192.168.1.0. If you do, and you eventually
down the line allow VPN client access and the users at home have an
identical IP subnet, they won't be able to connect. I suggest changing it to
something like:

192.168.100.0/24
192.168.110.0/24
192.168.120.0/24
192.168.130.0/24
etc

Or:
10.10.100.0/24
10.10.110.0/24
10.10.120.0/24
etc

If you eventually allow client VPN access, create a separate subnet for the
client VPN subnet, such as:
10.10.1.200

--
Ace

This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees and
confers no rights.

Please reply back to the newsgroup or forum for collaboration benefit among
responding engineers, and to help others benefit from your resolution.

Ace Fekay, MCT, MCITP EA, MCTS Windows 2008 & Exchange 2007, MCSE & MCSA
2003/2000, MCSA Messaging 2003
Microsoft Certified Trainer

For urgent issues, please contact Microsoft PSS directly. Please check
http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers.




 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: Second DHCP server seems to be ignoring requests Paul Bergson [MVP-DS] Active Directory 3 10-30-2009 08:14 PM
Re: Second DHCP server seems to be ignoring requests Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS] Active Directory 0 10-29-2009 06:13 AM
Error code: 80244023 SHAFT_V2 Windows Update 2 10-25-2009 05:13 PM
WindowsUpdate_8024D00A WindowsUpdate_dt000 Michelle Windows Vista Performance 14 03-01-2008 10:42 AM
Re: Vista Ultimate - Cannot search Error8007370D Robert Aldwinckle Windows Vista Performance 11 02-27-2008 06:34 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59