Re: flexibility of Windows DNS

In message
<d5f66df3-d71c-4e68-826c->
April <> was claimed to have wrote:

>wonder if I can specify NS records of an AD DNS zone with non-window
>dns servers (advertised), while the windows DNS servers remain the
>master and
>slaves (hidden), and the SOA MNAME is the Windows DNS master for
>dynamic updates to support AD?
>
>it seems to me this arrangement should not impact AD operations, any
>comments?

My gut feeling says that this might actually work, although I'm not 100%
confident that something in AD doesn't rely on NS records somewhere.

I would expect that this type of configuration would require extensive
testing, and that getting support on any sort of Active Directory issue
will rightly be impossible since this is such a non-standard
arrangement.