Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Server > Re: Hi Everyone,Just an update, the above registry import worked for awhile but

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Re: Hi Everyone,Just an update, the above registry import worked for awhile but

 
 
Chris Freestone
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-17-2010
If you get a command prompt running as system then you can set this via inetcpl.cpl

I'm trying to find a way to automate it with a registry script as I have to fix this on several hundred laptops. :S

Anyway, run cmd prompt with your admin account, as long as you have scheduled tasks enabled use this command:

at (time+1 minute) /interactive cmd.exe

e.g. if it's 15:45 on the server, do
at 15:46 /interactive cmd.exe

After a minute a command prompt should load with system rights. Type inetcpl.cpl, go and set the proxy as you would for a normal user and OK your way out. Job done.

> On Tuesday, September 23, 2008 11:57 PM PhilScot wrote:


> Hi there,
>
> I am wondering if someone can help me with this issue. We have recently
> changed a our proxy server and this particular program installed on Windows
> Server 2003 Service Pack 2 server will not connect to the internet to check
> for updates automatically anymore. Instead it sends me an alert email to tell
> me that the automatic update failed.
>
> I have spoken to the manufacturers of the software and they inform me that
> it will use the Proxy settings for the local system account and that I need
> to change this. So i go into the registry looking for
> HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-18\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Inter net
> Settings and sure enough, the old proxy server is there. So I modify it and
> restart and it has no effect. The updates still do not download and the Proxy
> Server setting in the registry is back to the old proxy server.
>
> Every other user of the server is fine. They can browse the internet without
> a problem.
>
> Can anyone help me to change the proxy settings for the LocalSystem account?
>
> Your help is appreciated.



>> On Wednesday, September 24, 2008 4:25 PM Phillip Windell wrote:


>> "PhilScott" <> wrote in message
>> news:E76AC3CC-09C2-4446-A510-...
>>
>> I was an ISA MVP (MS's proxy server/firewall) for three years and never ever
>> heard of doing anything like that. I would never expect it to work,..but
>> that is just me. Why? Because the Local System Account is specifically
>> designed to not function with "networking" and is supposed to be restricted
>> to local machine activity only. But I could be wrong....
>>
>> Anyway...
>>
>> What the application is and how it works matters
>>
>> What protocols it uses matter
>> CERN Compliant Web Proxys only do Http, Https. read-only FTP, and gopher
>> Winsock Proxys only do TCP or UDP based protocols (not ICMP, GRE, etc)
>> Don't know about Socks Proxys, no experience with them.
>>
>> What kind of proxy the old one was matters
>> (CERN Compliant Web Poxy, Winsock Proxy, Socks Proxy)
>>
>> What the new proxy is matters
>> (again CERN Compliant Web Poxy, Winsock Proxy, Socks Proxy)
>>
>> If the proxy requires authentication matters
>>
>> --
>> Phillip Windell
>> www.wandtv.com
>>
>> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
>> or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
>> -----------------------------------------------------



>>> On Wednesday, September 24, 2008 6:58 PM PhilScot wrote:


>>> Hi There,
>>>
>>> It is only using http to download the update files. The old proxy server was
>>> a single NIC ISA 2004 proxy server.... now we have a new server running ISA
>>> 2006 with dual NIC's and is providing firewall capabilities also.
>>>
>>> There is no authentication required on the proxy server at this point... but
>>> it will be required soon... In anticipation of this I have created a separate
>>> rule for this server only which is above the general internet access rule
>>> allowing unauthenticated internet access.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Phillip Windell" wrote:



>>>> On Thursday, September 25, 2008 10:49 AM Phillip Windell wrote:


>>>> "PhilScott" <> wrote in message
>>>> news:ACC5105B-4049-4038-B353-...
>>>>
>>>> You won't be able to require it. It will have to stay without
>>>> authentication.
>>>>
>>>> You will need run it throught the SecureNAT Service which doesn't require
>>>> anything beyond having the ISA in the LAN's "routing path" to the Internet.
>>>> The Rule should limit the source and destinations to the specific IP#s
>>>> involved and the Users portion of the Rule will need to be "All Users",..you
>>>> have no choice about that,..it must be "All Users".
>>>>
>>>> You might be able to use the Firewall Client Software on the Server and let
>>>> it run against the same Access Rule,..this would allow the machine to not
>>>> have ISA in the LAN's "routing path" to the Internet,...but personally, I
>>>> think you best bet is going to be the SecureNAT Service.
>>>>
>>>> With ISA2004 I have real doubts that it was really working [as you think it
>>>> was]. Because it was a single Nic ISA you therefore would have had a
>>>> Firewall on the LAN that was most likely the Default Gateway of the machine
>>>> or the Firewall was in the LAN's "routing path" to the Internet. The whole
>>>> "proxy setting thing" on the server was probably just flat out
>>>> failing,..which means the server would send the web request directly to the
>>>> Firewall which allowed it out to the Internet, effectively "ignoring" the
>>>> ISA,...so you would have no "visible" indication that it was not working as
>>>> you expected. But now that the ISA is running in a more proper dual nic
>>>> mode there is no way to "get around" the ISA if things fail becuase the ISA
>>>> is litterally physically "in the way",...so now when it fails it is visibly
>>>> obvious.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway in respect to my last post, MS ISA Server is:
>>>>
>>>> 1. CERN Compliant Web Poxy
>>>> 2. Winsock Proxy
>>>> 3. NAT Server (same as typical "hardware firewalls")
>>>>
>>>> It is all three types of Firewalls all rolled into a single product. Which
>>>> "component" of ISA that you use depends on how you setup the Client and the
>>>> ISA to interact with each other. It is possible for a Client to work as all
>>>> three types at the same time and will switch between the "modes" uniquely
>>>> for each connection "session" that the Client is involved in at the moment.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Phillip Windell
>>>> www.wandtv.com
>>>>
>>>> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
>>>> or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
>>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>>> Technet Library
>>>> ISA2004
>>>> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...chNet.10).aspx
>>>> ISA2006
>>>> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...chNet.10).aspx
>>>>
>>>> Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing
>>>> http://www.isaserver.org/articles/IS...cessRules.html
>>>>
>>>> Troubleshooting Client Authentication on Access Rules in ISA Server 2004
>>>> http://download.microsoft.com/downlo...7/ts_rules.doc
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/p...s/default.mspx
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft ISA Server Partners: Partner Hardware Solutions
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/forefront/e...epartners.mspx
>>>> -----------------------------------------------------



>>>>> On Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:00 PM PhilScot wrote:


>>>>> Can I just say that this is now starting to go off in the wrong tangent. The
>>>>> problem is not with my ISA Firewall or my rules or how it accesses the
>>>>> Internet. The problem is with my server and this application.
>>>>> The application on this server is trying to send HTTP requests for automatic
>>>>> updates to a proxy server that now no longer exists. I am trying to update
>>>>> this server with the new proxy server settings for the LOCALSYSTEM account
>>>>> (no other account is affected), but every attempt is failing. There are no
>>>>> problems with accessing the Internet on this server once I am logged in, but
>>>>> when NO ONE is logged in and it is trying to update the application
>>>>> automatically it uses the LOCALSYSTEM account (the account to which the
>>>>> application's service runs!) to download updates. The LOCALSYSTEM Proxy
>>>>> (settings in the registry key mentioned previously) is set to the OLD ISA
>>>>> SERVER. NO HTTP REQUESTS ARE HITTING OUR CURRENT ISA SERVER AT ALL. Are you
>>>>> able to help me with this?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Phillip Windell" wrote:



>>>>>> On Friday, September 26, 2008 3:14 PM Phillip Windell wrote:


>>>>>> "PhilScott" <> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:A64BA4E2-912C-4B64-BBDD-...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then I guess not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Phillip Windell
>>>>>> www.wandtv.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
>>>>>> or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------



>>>>>>> On Tuesday, February 17, 2009 5:27 AM Sapper wrote:


>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I had the same issue with old proxy settings on my production servers
>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>> HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\Internet
>>>>>>> Settings. If I deleted or change the proxy server key it would
>>>>>>> repopulate on reboot. I resolved the issue by exporting the
>>>>>>> HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\Internet
>>>>>>> settings from a from a known good new server build. Deleting the
>>>>>>> problematic internet setting keys and sub keys (after a backup), then
>>>>>>> importing the known good registry settings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards Sapper
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sapper
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Sapper's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/members/sapper.htm
>>>>>>> View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/windows-s...lp/1043388.htm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://forums.techarena.in



>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 03, 2009 6:57 PM Sapper wrote:


>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just an update, the above registry import worked for a while but after
>>>>>>>> a few days the behaviour reoccurred.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We finally had success with the following.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ? Searched the sysvol on our DC for cs folder
>>>>>>>> ? Found Connect.set & cs.dat files in the cs folder.
>>>>>>>> ? Identified the policy ID that the files belonged to
>>>>>>>> \\servername\sysvol\domainname\Policies\{1FB2E411-2CEF-4324-9C04-730889F5A071}\User\MICROSOFT\IEAK\BRANDING\cs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ? Identified the policy within AD
>>>>>>>> ? Removed and recreated the policy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On the servers that were affected
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> DELETE values within:
>>>>>>>> HKU\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVer sion\Internet
>>>>>>>> Settings\Connections\DefaultConnectionSettings
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Clear the ProxyEnable & ProxyServer Values
>>>>>>>> HKU\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVer sion\Internet
>>>>>>>> Settings
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Reboot server and check the .default registry settings.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sapper
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Sapper
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> Sapper's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/members/sapper.htm
>>>>>>>> View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/windows-s...lp/1043388.htm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://forums.techarena.in



>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 03, 2009 7:25 PM Sapper wrote:


>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just an update, the above registry import worked for a while but after
>>>>>>>>> a few days the behaviour reoccurred.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We finally had success with the following.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? Searched the sysvol on our DC for cs folder
>>>>>>>>> ? Found Connect.set & cs.dat files in the cs folder.
>>>>>>>>> ? Identified the policy ID that the files belonged to
>>>>>>>>> \\servername\sysvol\domainname\Policies\{1FB2E411-2CEF-4324-9C04-730889F5A071}\User\MICROSOFT\IEAK\BRANDING\cs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? Identified the policy within AD
>>>>>>>>> ? Removed and recreated the policy
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On the servers that were affected
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> DELETE values within:
>>>>>>>>> HKU\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVer sion\Internet
>>>>>>>>> Settings\Connections\DefaultConnectionSettings
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Clear the ProxyEnable & ProxyServer Values
>>>>>>>>> HKU\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVer sion\Internet
>>>>>>>>> Settings
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Reboot server and check the .default registry settings.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sapper
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Sapper
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Sapper's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/members/sapper.htm
>>>>>>>>> View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/windows-s...lp/1043388.htm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://forums.techarena.in



>>>>>>>>> Submitted via EggHeadCafe
>>>>>>>>> Microsoft SQL Server Developer For Beginners
>>>>>>>>> http://www.eggheadcafe.com/training-...QL-Server.aspx

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Antonio Pacheco
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-10-2011
Exactly the same issue and the AT command to edit the LOCAL SYSTEM's internet settings with inetcpl.cpl did the trick.
Any idea how to automate it?

Any way thanks a lot to Chris Freestone for this!

> On Tuesday, September 23, 2008 11:57 PM PhilScot wrote:


> Hi there,
>
> I am wondering if someone can help me with this issue. We have recently
> changed a our proxy server and this particular program installed on Windows
> Server 2003 Service Pack 2 server will not connect to the internet to check
> for updates automatically anymore. Instead it sends me an alert email to tell
> me that the automatic update failed.
>
> I have spoken to the manufacturers of the software and they inform me that
> it will use the Proxy settings for the local system account and that I need
> to change this. So i go into the registry looking for
> HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-18\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Inter net
> Settings and sure enough, the old proxy server is there. So I modify it and
> restart and it has no effect. The updates still do not download and the Proxy
> Server setting in the registry is back to the old proxy server.
>
> Every other user of the server is fine. They can browse the internet without
> a problem.
>
> Can anyone help me to change the proxy settings for the LocalSystem account?
>
> Your help is appreciated.



>> On Wednesday, September 24, 2008 4:25 PM Phillip Windell wrote:


>> "PhilScott" <> wrote in message
>> news:E76AC3CC-09C2-4446-A510-...
>>
>> I was an ISA MVP (MS's proxy server/firewall) for three years and never ever
>> heard of doing anything like that. I would never expect it to work,..but
>> that is just me. Why? Because the Local System Account is specifically
>> designed to not function with "networking" and is supposed to be restricted
>> to local machine activity only. But I could be wrong....
>>
>> Anyway...
>>
>> What the application is and how it works matters
>>
>> What protocols it uses matter
>> CERN Compliant Web Proxys only do Http, Https. read-only FTP, and gopher
>> Winsock Proxys only do TCP or UDP based protocols (not ICMP, GRE, etc)
>> Don't know about Socks Proxys, no experience with them.
>>
>> What kind of proxy the old one was matters
>> (CERN Compliant Web Poxy, Winsock Proxy, Socks Proxy)
>>
>> What the new proxy is matters
>> (again CERN Compliant Web Poxy, Winsock Proxy, Socks Proxy)
>>
>> If the proxy requires authentication matters
>>
>> --
>> Phillip Windell
>> www.wandtv.com
>>
>> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
>> or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
>> -----------------------------------------------------



>>> On Wednesday, September 24, 2008 6:58 PM PhilScot wrote:


>>> Hi There,
>>>
>>> It is only using http to download the update files. The old proxy server was
>>> a single NIC ISA 2004 proxy server.... now we have a new server running ISA
>>> 2006 with dual NIC's and is providing firewall capabilities also.
>>>
>>> There is no authentication required on the proxy server at this point... but
>>> it will be required soon... In anticipation of this I have created a separate
>>> rule for this server only which is above the general internet access rule
>>> allowing unauthenticated internet access.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Phillip Windell" wrote:



>>>> On Thursday, September 25, 2008 10:49 AM Phillip Windell wrote:


>>>> "PhilScott" <> wrote in message
>>>> news:ACC5105B-4049-4038-B353-...
>>>>
>>>> You won't be able to require it. It will have to stay without
>>>> authentication.
>>>>
>>>> You will need run it throught the SecureNAT Service which doesn't require
>>>> anything beyond having the ISA in the LAN's "routing path" to the Internet.
>>>> The Rule should limit the source and destinations to the specific IP#s
>>>> involved and the Users portion of the Rule will need to be "All Users",..you
>>>> have no choice about that,..it must be "All Users".
>>>>
>>>> You might be able to use the Firewall Client Software on the Server and let
>>>> it run against the same Access Rule,..this would allow the machine to not
>>>> have ISA in the LAN's "routing path" to the Internet,...but personally, I
>>>> think you best bet is going to be the SecureNAT Service.
>>>>
>>>> With ISA2004 I have real doubts that it was really working [as you think it
>>>> was]. Because it was a single Nic ISA you therefore would have had a
>>>> Firewall on the LAN that was most likely the Default Gateway of the machine
>>>> or the Firewall was in the LAN's "routing path" to the Internet. The whole
>>>> "proxy setting thing" on the server was probably just flat out
>>>> failing,..which means the server would send the web request directly to the
>>>> Firewall which allowed it out to the Internet, effectively "ignoring" the
>>>> ISA,...so you would have no "visible" indication that it was not working as
>>>> you expected. But now that the ISA is running in a more proper dual nic
>>>> mode there is no way to "get around" the ISA if things fail becuase the ISA
>>>> is litterally physically "in the way",...so now when it fails it is visibly
>>>> obvious.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway in respect to my last post, MS ISA Server is:
>>>>
>>>> 1. CERN Compliant Web Poxy
>>>> 2. Winsock Proxy
>>>> 3. NAT Server (same as typical "hardware firewalls")
>>>>
>>>> It is all three types of Firewalls all rolled into a single product. Which
>>>> "component" of ISA that you use depends on how you setup the Client and the
>>>> ISA to interact with each other. It is possible for a Client to work as all
>>>> three types at the same time and will switch between the "modes" uniquely
>>>> for each connection "session" that the Client is involved in at the moment.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Phillip Windell
>>>> www.wandtv.com
>>>>
>>>> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
>>>> or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
>>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>>> Technet Library
>>>> ISA2004
>>>> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...chNet.10).aspx
>>>> ISA2006
>>>> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...chNet.10).aspx
>>>>
>>>> Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing
>>>> http://www.isaserver.org/articles/IS...cessRules.html
>>>>
>>>> Troubleshooting Client Authentication on Access Rules in ISA Server 2004
>>>> http://download.microsoft.com/downlo...7/ts_rules.doc
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/p...s/default.mspx
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft ISA Server Partners: Partner Hardware Solutions
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/forefront/e...epartners.mspx
>>>> -----------------------------------------------------



>>>>> On Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:00 PM PhilScot wrote:


>>>>> Can I just say that this is now starting to go off in the wrong tangent. The
>>>>> problem is not with my ISA Firewall or my rules or how it accesses the
>>>>> Internet. The problem is with my server and this application.
>>>>> The application on this server is trying to send HTTP requests for automatic
>>>>> updates to a proxy server that now no longer exists. I am trying to update
>>>>> this server with the new proxy server settings for the LOCALSYSTEM account
>>>>> (no other account is affected), but every attempt is failing. There are no
>>>>> problems with accessing the Internet on this server once I am logged in, but
>>>>> when NO ONE is logged in and it is trying to update the application
>>>>> automatically it uses the LOCALSYSTEM account (the account to which the
>>>>> application's service runs!) to download updates. The LOCALSYSTEM Proxy
>>>>> (settings in the registry key mentioned previously) is set to the OLD ISA
>>>>> SERVER. NO HTTP REQUESTS ARE HITTING OUR CURRENT ISA SERVER AT ALL. Are you
>>>>> able to help me with this?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Phillip Windell" wrote:



>>>>>> On Friday, September 26, 2008 3:14 PM Phillip Windell wrote:


>>>>>> "PhilScott" <> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:A64BA4E2-912C-4B64-BBDD-...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then I guess not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Phillip Windell
>>>>>> www.wandtv.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
>>>>>> or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------



>>>>>>> On Tuesday, February 17, 2009 5:27 AM Sapper wrote:


>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I had the same issue with old proxy settings on my production servers
>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>> HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\Internet
>>>>>>> Settings. If I deleted or change the proxy server key it would
>>>>>>> repopulate on reboot. I resolved the issue by exporting the
>>>>>>> HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\Internet
>>>>>>> settings from a from a known good new server build. Deleting the
>>>>>>> problematic internet setting keys and sub keys (after a backup), then
>>>>>>> importing the known good registry settings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards Sapper
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sapper
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Sapper's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/members/sapper.htm
>>>>>>> View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/windows-s...lp/1043388.htm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://forums.techarena.in



>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 03, 2009 6:57 PM Sapper wrote:


>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just an update, the above registry import worked for a while but after
>>>>>>>> a few days the behaviour reoccurred.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We finally had success with the following.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ? Searched the sysvol on our DC for cs folder
>>>>>>>> ? Found Connect.set & cs.dat files in the cs folder.
>>>>>>>> ? Identified the policy ID that the files belonged to
>>>>>>>> \\servername\sysvol\domainname\Policies\{1FB2E411-2CEF-4324-9C04-730889F5A071}\User\MICROSOFT\IEAK\BRANDING\cs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ? Identified the policy within AD
>>>>>>>> ? Removed and recreated the policy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On the servers that were affected
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> DELETE values within:
>>>>>>>> HKU\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVer sion\Internet
>>>>>>>> Settings\Connections\DefaultConnectionSettings
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Clear the ProxyEnable & ProxyServer Values
>>>>>>>> HKU\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVer sion\Internet
>>>>>>>> Settings
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Reboot server and check the .default registry settings.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sapper
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Sapper
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> Sapper's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/members/sapper.htm
>>>>>>>> View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/windows-s...lp/1043388.htm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://forums.techarena.in



>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 03, 2009 7:25 PM Sapper wrote:


>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just an update, the above registry import worked for a while but after
>>>>>>>>> a few days the behaviour reoccurred.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We finally had success with the following.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? Searched the sysvol on our DC for cs folder
>>>>>>>>> ? Found Connect.set & cs.dat files in the cs folder.
>>>>>>>>> ? Identified the policy ID that the files belonged to
>>>>>>>>> \\servername\sysvol\domainname\Policies\{1FB2E411-2CEF-4324-9C04-730889F5A071}\User\MICROSOFT\IEAK\BRANDING\cs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? Identified the policy within AD
>>>>>>>>> ? Removed and recreated the policy
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On the servers that were affected
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> DELETE values within:
>>>>>>>>> HKU\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVer sion\Internet
>>>>>>>>> Settings\Connections\DefaultConnectionSettings
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Clear the ProxyEnable & ProxyServer Values
>>>>>>>>> HKU\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVer sion\Internet
>>>>>>>>> Settings
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Reboot server and check the .default registry settings.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sapper
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Sapper
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Sapper's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/members/sapper.htm
>>>>>>>>> View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/windows-s...lp/1043388.htm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://forums.techarena.in



>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, December 17, 2010 2:23 PM Chris Freestone wrote:


>>>>>>>>>> If you get a command prompt running as system then you can set this via inetcpl.cpl
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to find a way to automate it with a registry script as I have to fix this on several hundred laptops. :S
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, run cmd prompt with your admin account, as long as you have scheduled tasks enabled use this command:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> at (time+1 minute) /interactive cmd.exe
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> e.g. if it's 15:45 on the server, do
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> at 15:46 /interactive cmd.exe
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> After a minute a command prompt should load with system rights. Type inetcpl.cpl, go and set the proxy as you would for a normal user and OK your way out. Job done.



>>>>>>>>>> Submitted via EggHeadCafe
>>>>>>>>>> Microsoft Silverlight For Beginners
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.eggheadcafe.com/training-...lverlight.aspx

 
Reply With Quote
 
Antonio Pacheco
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-10-2011
Thank you Chris Freestone: it did the trick!

Any idea how to automate it thru GPO or running at startup?

Thanks

> On Tuesday, September 23, 2008 11:57 PM PhilScot wrote:


> Hi there,
>
> I am wondering if someone can help me with this issue. We have recently
> changed a our proxy server and this particular program installed on Windows
> Server 2003 Service Pack 2 server will not connect to the internet to check
> for updates automatically anymore. Instead it sends me an alert email to tell
> me that the automatic update failed.
>
> I have spoken to the manufacturers of the software and they inform me that
> it will use the Proxy settings for the local system account and that I need
> to change this. So i go into the registry looking for
> HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-18\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Inter net
> Settings and sure enough, the old proxy server is there. So I modify it and
> restart and it has no effect. The updates still do not download and the Proxy
> Server setting in the registry is back to the old proxy server.
>
> Every other user of the server is fine. They can browse the internet without
> a problem.
>
> Can anyone help me to change the proxy settings for the LocalSystem account?
>
> Your help is appreciated.



>> On Wednesday, September 24, 2008 4:25 PM Phillip Windell wrote:


>> "PhilScott" <> wrote in message
>> news:E76AC3CC-09C2-4446-A510-...
>>
>> I was an ISA MVP (MS's proxy server/firewall) for three years and never ever
>> heard of doing anything like that. I would never expect it to work,..but
>> that is just me. Why? Because the Local System Account is specifically
>> designed to not function with "networking" and is supposed to be restricted
>> to local machine activity only. But I could be wrong....
>>
>> Anyway...
>>
>> What the application is and how it works matters
>>
>> What protocols it uses matter
>> CERN Compliant Web Proxys only do Http, Https. read-only FTP, and gopher
>> Winsock Proxys only do TCP or UDP based protocols (not ICMP, GRE, etc)
>> Don't know about Socks Proxys, no experience with them.
>>
>> What kind of proxy the old one was matters
>> (CERN Compliant Web Poxy, Winsock Proxy, Socks Proxy)
>>
>> What the new proxy is matters
>> (again CERN Compliant Web Poxy, Winsock Proxy, Socks Proxy)
>>
>> If the proxy requires authentication matters
>>
>> --
>> Phillip Windell
>> www.wandtv.com
>>
>> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
>> or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
>> -----------------------------------------------------



>>> On Wednesday, September 24, 2008 6:58 PM PhilScot wrote:


>>> Hi There,
>>>
>>> It is only using http to download the update files. The old proxy server was
>>> a single NIC ISA 2004 proxy server.... now we have a new server running ISA
>>> 2006 with dual NIC's and is providing firewall capabilities also.
>>>
>>> There is no authentication required on the proxy server at this point... but
>>> it will be required soon... In anticipation of this I have created a separate
>>> rule for this server only which is above the general internet access rule
>>> allowing unauthenticated internet access.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Phillip Windell" wrote:



>>>> On Thursday, September 25, 2008 10:49 AM Phillip Windell wrote:


>>>> "PhilScott" <> wrote in message
>>>> news:ACC5105B-4049-4038-B353-...
>>>>
>>>> You won't be able to require it. It will have to stay without
>>>> authentication.
>>>>
>>>> You will need run it throught the SecureNAT Service which doesn't require
>>>> anything beyond having the ISA in the LAN's "routing path" to the Internet.
>>>> The Rule should limit the source and destinations to the specific IP#s
>>>> involved and the Users portion of the Rule will need to be "All Users",..you
>>>> have no choice about that,..it must be "All Users".
>>>>
>>>> You might be able to use the Firewall Client Software on the Server and let
>>>> it run against the same Access Rule,..this would allow the machine to not
>>>> have ISA in the LAN's "routing path" to the Internet,...but personally, I
>>>> think you best bet is going to be the SecureNAT Service.
>>>>
>>>> With ISA2004 I have real doubts that it was really working [as you think it
>>>> was]. Because it was a single Nic ISA you therefore would have had a
>>>> Firewall on the LAN that was most likely the Default Gateway of the machine
>>>> or the Firewall was in the LAN's "routing path" to the Internet. The whole
>>>> "proxy setting thing" on the server was probably just flat out
>>>> failing,..which means the server would send the web request directly to the
>>>> Firewall which allowed it out to the Internet, effectively "ignoring" the
>>>> ISA,...so you would have no "visible" indication that it was not working as
>>>> you expected. But now that the ISA is running in a more proper dual nic
>>>> mode there is no way to "get around" the ISA if things fail becuase the ISA
>>>> is litterally physically "in the way",...so now when it fails it is visibly
>>>> obvious.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway in respect to my last post, MS ISA Server is:
>>>>
>>>> 1. CERN Compliant Web Poxy
>>>> 2. Winsock Proxy
>>>> 3. NAT Server (same as typical "hardware firewalls")
>>>>
>>>> It is all three types of Firewalls all rolled into a single product. Which
>>>> "component" of ISA that you use depends on how you setup the Client and the
>>>> ISA to interact with each other. It is possible for a Client to work as all
>>>> three types at the same time and will switch between the "modes" uniquely
>>>> for each connection "session" that the Client is involved in at the moment.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Phillip Windell
>>>> www.wandtv.com
>>>>
>>>> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
>>>> or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
>>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>>> Technet Library
>>>> ISA2004
>>>> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...chNet.10).aspx
>>>> ISA2006
>>>> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...chNet.10).aspx
>>>>
>>>> Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing
>>>> http://www.isaserver.org/articles/IS...cessRules.html
>>>>
>>>> Troubleshooting Client Authentication on Access Rules in ISA Server 2004
>>>> http://download.microsoft.com/downlo...7/ts_rules.doc
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/p...s/default.mspx
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft ISA Server Partners: Partner Hardware Solutions
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/forefront/e...epartners.mspx
>>>> -----------------------------------------------------



>>>>> On Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:00 PM PhilScot wrote:


>>>>> Can I just say that this is now starting to go off in the wrong tangent. The
>>>>> problem is not with my ISA Firewall or my rules or how it accesses the
>>>>> Internet. The problem is with my server and this application.
>>>>> The application on this server is trying to send HTTP requests for automatic
>>>>> updates to a proxy server that now no longer exists. I am trying to update
>>>>> this server with the new proxy server settings for the LOCALSYSTEM account
>>>>> (no other account is affected), but every attempt is failing. There are no
>>>>> problems with accessing the Internet on this server once I am logged in, but
>>>>> when NO ONE is logged in and it is trying to update the application
>>>>> automatically it uses the LOCALSYSTEM account (the account to which the
>>>>> application's service runs!) to download updates. The LOCALSYSTEM Proxy
>>>>> (settings in the registry key mentioned previously) is set to the OLD ISA
>>>>> SERVER. NO HTTP REQUESTS ARE HITTING OUR CURRENT ISA SERVER AT ALL. Are you
>>>>> able to help me with this?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Phillip Windell" wrote:



>>>>>> On Friday, September 26, 2008 3:14 PM Phillip Windell wrote:


>>>>>> "PhilScott" <> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:A64BA4E2-912C-4B64-BBDD-...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then I guess not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Phillip Windell
>>>>>> www.wandtv.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
>>>>>> or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------



>>>>>>> On Tuesday, February 17, 2009 5:27 AM Sapper wrote:


>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I had the same issue with old proxy settings on my production servers
>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>> HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\Internet
>>>>>>> Settings. If I deleted or change the proxy server key it would
>>>>>>> repopulate on reboot. I resolved the issue by exporting the
>>>>>>> HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\Internet
>>>>>>> settings from a from a known good new server build. Deleting the
>>>>>>> problematic internet setting keys and sub keys (after a backup), then
>>>>>>> importing the known good registry settings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards Sapper
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sapper
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Sapper's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/members/sapper.htm
>>>>>>> View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/windows-s...lp/1043388.htm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://forums.techarena.in



>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 03, 2009 6:57 PM Sapper wrote:


>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just an update, the above registry import worked for a while but after
>>>>>>>> a few days the behaviour reoccurred.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We finally had success with the following.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ? Searched the sysvol on our DC for cs folder
>>>>>>>> ? Found Connect.set & cs.dat files in the cs folder.
>>>>>>>> ? Identified the policy ID that the files belonged to
>>>>>>>> \\servername\sysvol\domainname\Policies\{1FB2E411-2CEF-4324-9C04-730889F5A071}\User\MICROSOFT\IEAK\BRANDING\cs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ? Identified the policy within AD
>>>>>>>> ? Removed and recreated the policy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On the servers that were affected
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> DELETE values within:
>>>>>>>> HKU\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVer sion\Internet
>>>>>>>> Settings\Connections\DefaultConnectionSettings
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Clear the ProxyEnable & ProxyServer Values
>>>>>>>> HKU\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVer sion\Internet
>>>>>>>> Settings
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Reboot server and check the .default registry settings.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sapper
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Sapper
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> Sapper's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/members/sapper.htm
>>>>>>>> View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/windows-s...lp/1043388.htm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://forums.techarena.in



>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 03, 2009 7:25 PM Sapper wrote:


>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just an update, the above registry import worked for a while but after
>>>>>>>>> a few days the behaviour reoccurred.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We finally had success with the following.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? Searched the sysvol on our DC for cs folder
>>>>>>>>> ? Found Connect.set & cs.dat files in the cs folder.
>>>>>>>>> ? Identified the policy ID that the files belonged to
>>>>>>>>> \\servername\sysvol\domainname\Policies\{1FB2E411-2CEF-4324-9C04-730889F5A071}\User\MICROSOFT\IEAK\BRANDING\cs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? Identified the policy within AD
>>>>>>>>> ? Removed and recreated the policy
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On the servers that were affected
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> DELETE values within:
>>>>>>>>> HKU\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVer sion\Internet
>>>>>>>>> Settings\Connections\DefaultConnectionSettings
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Clear the ProxyEnable & ProxyServer Values
>>>>>>>>> HKU\.DEFAULT\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVer sion\Internet
>>>>>>>>> Settings
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Reboot server and check the .default registry settings.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sapper
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Sapper
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Sapper's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/members/sapper.htm
>>>>>>>>> View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/windows-s...lp/1043388.htm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://forums.techarena.in



>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, December 17, 2010 2:23 PM Chris Freestone wrote:


>>>>>>>>>> If you get a command prompt running as system then you can set this via inetcpl.cpl
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to find a way to automate it with a registry script as I have to fix this on several hundred laptops. :S
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, run cmd prompt with your admin account, as long as you have scheduled tasks enabled use this command:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> at (time+1 minute) /interactive cmd.exe
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> e.g. if it's 15:45 on the server, do
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> at 15:46 /interactive cmd.exe
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> After a minute a command prompt should load with system rights. Type inetcpl.cpl, go and set the proxy as you would for a normal user and OK your way out. Job done.



>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, January 10, 2011 9:35 AM Antonio Pacheco wrote:


>>>>>>>>>>> Exactly the same issue and the AT command to edit the LOCAL SYSTEM's internet settings with inetcpl.cpl did the trick.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Any idea how to automate it?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Any way thanks a lot to Chris Freestone for this!



>>>>>>>>>>> Submitted via EggHeadCafe
>>>>>>>>>>> Oracle Developer For Beginners
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.eggheadcafe.com/training-...L-Samples.aspx

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MS Office Home 7 Student Update Problems Alice Windows Vista General Discussion 12 08-25-2010 05:21 PM
error 646 jkremke Windows Update 53 06-28-2010 07:35 PM
Can't install v6 ms update KB898461 - error 0x8007F001. just help me pls Windows Update 12 06-06-2010 02:51 PM
"Some updates could not be installed" Antnee20x Windows Update 7 12-18-2009 07:01 PM
Explorer Crashes after Update Trader Windows Update 1 11-10-2009 05:41 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59