Re: Hugh Lack of Vista Support.

"Bengie" <> wrote in message
news:181A532D-F11C-4D65-9B7F-...
> It seems that despite the availability of Vista Beta for testing and
> development of drivers and utility applications for such an extended
> period,
> the majority of companies are very slow to get their Vista compatable
> versions onto their sites for download.
> Ati has a Vista Beta version of drivers for all their graphic cards and
> others could well do to follow their example.
> Now that Vista Beta is in the public domain and millions are trying it, it
> will never be fully compatable until companies wake up to the fact that
> the
> first release of Vista is not very far away and need to get their Vista
> versions of drivers and utilities into the public domain and available for
> download.
> Until this happens I think there are going to be many frustrating weeks or
> months ahead for those who are either doing testing and reporting and for
> those who are just trying Vista out of curiosity.
>
> TO ALL COMPANIES THAT PRODUCE SOFTWARE, GET YOU FINGER OUT AND GET YOUR
> DRIVERS ETC UP ON YOUR SITES. YOU ARE GOING TO BE LEFT BEHIND.
>
> YOU ARE ALSO FRUSTRATING THE FULL TESTING OF WINDOWS VISTA BETA.

Cross posted to
microsoft.public.windows.vista.general

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
"Anyone who prefers security over freedom deserves neither."

I agree with Bengie, the Longhorn SDKs for both 32 and 64 bit platforms have
been out since April 2005 released at WinHEC 2005. What in heavens name
could be taking you so long to at least have something half workable by beta
2? I don't think you need Vista RTM to start creating even a buggy device
driver.
--
--
Andre
Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta

"Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <> wrote in message
news:%23tYf%...
> "Bengie" <> wrote in message
> news:181A532D-F11C-4D65-9B7F-...
>> It seems that despite the availability of Vista Beta for testing and
>> development of drivers and utility applications for such an extended
>> period,
>> the majority of companies are very slow to get their Vista compatable
>> versions onto their sites for download.
>> Ati has a Vista Beta version of drivers for all their graphic cards and
>> others could well do to follow their example.
>> Now that Vista Beta is in the public domain and millions are trying it,
>> it
>> will never be fully compatable until companies wake up to the fact that
>> the
>> first release of Vista is not very far away and need to get their Vista
>> versions of drivers and utilities into the public domain and available
>> for
>> download.
>> Until this happens I think there are going to be many frustrating weeks
>> or
>> months ahead for those who are either doing testing and reporting and for
>> those who are just trying Vista out of curiosity.
>>
>> TO ALL COMPANIES THAT PRODUCE SOFTWARE, GET YOU FINGER OUT AND GET YOUR
>> DRIVERS ETC UP ON YOUR SITES. YOU ARE GOING TO BE LEFT BEHIND.
>>
>> YOU ARE ALSO FRUSTRATING THE FULL TESTING OF WINDOWS VISTA BETA.
>
> Cross posted to
> microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
>
> --
> Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
> "Anyone who prefers security over freedom deserves neither."
>
>

Couldn't agree more, although posting here probably isnt going to get the
word out. If you have hardware and there are no Vista drivers yet, go to the
manufactrer's websites and post on their forums, or nag them in emails,
threaten to buy from their competition..if we complain enough they'll have
to do something



"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <> wrote in message
news:...
>I agree with Bengie, the Longhorn SDKs for both 32 and 64 bit platforms
>have been out since April 2005 released at WinHEC 2005. What in heavens
>name could be taking you so long to at least have something half workable
>by beta 2? I don't think you need Vista RTM to start creating even a buggy
>device driver.
> --
> --
> Andre
> Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>
> "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <> wrote in message
> news:%23tYf%...
>> "Bengie" <> wrote in message
>> news:181A532D-F11C-4D65-9B7F-...
>>> It seems that despite the availability of Vista Beta for testing and
>>> development of drivers and utility applications for such an extended
>>> period,
>>> the majority of companies are very slow to get their Vista compatable
>>> versions onto their sites for download.
>>> Ati has a Vista Beta version of drivers for all their graphic cards and
>>> others could well do to follow their example.
>>> Now that Vista Beta is in the public domain and millions are trying it,
>>> it
>>> will never be fully compatable until companies wake up to the fact that
>>> the
>>> first release of Vista is not very far away and need to get their Vista
>>> versions of drivers and utilities into the public domain and available
>>> for
>>> download.
>>> Until this happens I think there are going to be many frustrating weeks
>>> or
>>> months ahead for those who are either doing testing and reporting and
>>> for
>>> those who are just trying Vista out of curiosity.
>>>
>>> TO ALL COMPANIES THAT PRODUCE SOFTWARE, GET YOU FINGER OUT AND GET YOUR
>>> DRIVERS ETC UP ON YOUR SITES. YOU ARE GOING TO BE LEFT BEHIND.
>>>
>>> YOU ARE ALSO FRUSTRATING THE FULL TESTING OF WINDOWS VISTA BETA.
>>
>> Cross posted to
>> microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
>>
>> --
>> Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
>> "Anyone who prefers security over freedom deserves neither."
>>
>>
>
>

The Software industry is fully supporting Vista, yeah right, I don't think so !

What are they all waiting for, I don't think MS is going to scrap Vista at
this late stage of development, so how about the third party software folks
get cracking, it will be Xmas soon, and no compatable third party software,
not good. !

Popular handy free video editors and FX.

Virtual Dub 1.6.14 (no mpeg2 support)
Virtual Dub Mod 1.5.10.2 (mpeg2 support)
Avid Free DV 1.6.1
Virtual Edit Free 1.41
Zein Stein 4.0
Wax 2.0
Video Fun Box 1.10
Magix Movie Editor Silver Free 3.0.4.0 (last free version)

Most don't say on their websites if Vista Beta2 (32bit or 64bit) is
supported, but they should run ok on x86 (32bit) Vista Beta2 v5384.4

I am fedup asking software providers to update their products and websites,
they never do, very slack !



"Bones" wrote:

> Couldn't agree more, although posting here probably isnt going to get the
> word out. If you have hardware and there are no Vista drivers yet, go to the
> manufactrer's websites and post on their forums, or nag them in emails,
> threaten to buy from their competition..if we complain enough they'll have
> to do something
>
>
>
> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> >I agree with Bengie, the Longhorn SDKs for both 32 and 64 bit platforms
> >have been out since April 2005 released at WinHEC 2005. What in heavens
> >name could be taking you so long to at least have something half workable
> >by beta 2? I don't think you need Vista RTM to start creating even a buggy
> >device driver.
> > --
> > --
> > Andre
> > Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
> > Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
> > Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
> > http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
> >
> > "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <> wrote in message
> > news:%23tYf%...
> >> "Bengie" <> wrote in message
> >> news:181A532D-F11C-4D65-9B7F-...
> >>> It seems that despite the availability of Vista Beta for testing and
> >>> development of drivers and utility applications for such an extended
> >>> period,
> >>> the majority of companies are very slow to get their Vista compatable
> >>> versions onto their sites for download.
> >>> Ati has a Vista Beta version of drivers for all their graphic cards and
> >>> others could well do to follow their example.
> >>> Now that Vista Beta is in the public domain and millions are trying it,
> >>> it
> >>> will never be fully compatable until companies wake up to the fact that
> >>> the
> >>> first release of Vista is not very far away and need to get their Vista
> >>> versions of drivers and utilities into the public domain and available
> >>> for
> >>> download.
> >>> Until this happens I think there are going to be many frustrating weeks
> >>> or
> >>> months ahead for those who are either doing testing and reporting and
> >>> for
> >>> those who are just trying Vista out of curiosity.
> >>>
> >>> TO ALL COMPANIES THAT PRODUCE SOFTWARE, GET YOU FINGER OUT AND GET YOUR
> >>> DRIVERS ETC UP ON YOUR SITES. YOU ARE GOING TO BE LEFT BEHIND.
> >>>
> >>> YOU ARE ALSO FRUSTRATING THE FULL TESTING OF WINDOWS VISTA BETA.
> >>
> >> Cross posted to
> >> microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
> >>
> >> --
> >> Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
> >> "Anyone who prefers security over freedom deserves neither."
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>

Bones is correct!

I have worked with PC's since they first came out and all the hardware
manufacturers operate the same way. They wait until a new operating system is
out on the retail market before they start testing for support. I have seen
some support not appear for 9 months after the OS is out.

When I asked HP about my PC running on XP when it comes out they told me I
should just buy a new PC instead of trying to run XP on my old one. I did buy
a new PC, and of course it was NOT an HP.

We need to keep asking the manufacturers through the forums, user groups and
email.

Mark


"Bones" wrote:

> Couldn't agree more, although posting here probably isnt going to get the
> word out. If you have hardware and there are no Vista drivers yet, go to the
> manufactrer's websites and post on their forums, or nag them in emails,
> threaten to buy from their competition..if we complain enough they'll have
> to do something
>
>
>
> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> >I agree with Bengie, the Longhorn SDKs for both 32 and 64 bit platforms
> >have been out since April 2005 released at WinHEC 2005. What in heavens
> >name could be taking you so long to at least have something half workable
> >by beta 2? I don't think you need Vista RTM to start creating even a buggy
> >device driver.
> > --
> > --
> > Andre
> > Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
> > Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
> > Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
> > http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
> >
> > "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <> wrote in message
> > news:%23tYf%...
> >> "Bengie" <> wrote in message
> >> news:181A532D-F11C-4D65-9B7F-...
> >>> It seems that despite the availability of Vista Beta for testing and
> >>> development of drivers and utility applications for such an extended
> >>> period,
> >>> the majority of companies are very slow to get their Vista compatable
> >>> versions onto their sites for download.
> >>> Ati has a Vista Beta version of drivers for all their graphic cards and
> >>> others could well do to follow their example.
> >>> Now that Vista Beta is in the public domain and millions are trying it,
> >>> it
> >>> will never be fully compatable until companies wake up to the fact that
> >>> the
> >>> first release of Vista is not very far away and need to get their Vista
> >>> versions of drivers and utilities into the public domain and available
> >>> for
> >>> download.
> >>> Until this happens I think there are going to be many frustrating weeks
> >>> or
> >>> months ahead for those who are either doing testing and reporting and
> >>> for
> >>> those who are just trying Vista out of curiosity.
> >>>
> >>> TO ALL COMPANIES THAT PRODUCE SOFTWARE, GET YOU FINGER OUT AND GET YOUR
> >>> DRIVERS ETC UP ON YOUR SITES. YOU ARE GOING TO BE LEFT BEHIND.
> >>>
> >>> YOU ARE ALSO FRUSTRATING THE FULL TESTING OF WINDOWS VISTA BETA.
> >>
> >> Cross posted to
> >> microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
> >>
> >> --
> >> Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
> >> "Anyone who prefers security over freedom deserves neither."
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>

I don't need telling twice - I will visit all the sites of the equipment I
have and post my disatisfaction at their lack of progress. If ATI can do it
for their full range of cards then so can the others, there is no excuse. If
I get any response from them I bet it will say they are in development. They
should have been in development 12 months ago. I will let you all know what
I get in reply. It would be nice if some of you would join me in doing so.
Thank you Bones.

"Mark S-123" wrote:

> Bones is correct!
>
> I have worked with PC's since they first came out and all the hardware
> manufacturers operate the same way. They wait until a new operating system is
> out on the retail market before they start testing for support. I have seen
> some support not appear for 9 months after the OS is out.
>
> When I asked HP about my PC running on XP when it comes out they told me I
> should just buy a new PC instead of trying to run XP on my old one. I did buy
> a new PC, and of course it was NOT an HP.
>
> We need to keep asking the manufacturers through the forums, user groups and
> email.
>
> Mark
>
>
> "Bones" wrote:
>
> > Couldn't agree more, although posting here probably isnt going to get the
> > word out. If you have hardware and there are no Vista drivers yet, go to the
> > manufactrer's websites and post on their forums, or nag them in emails,
> > threaten to buy from their competition..if we complain enough they'll have
> > to do something
> >
> >
> >
> > "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <> wrote in message
> > news:...
> > >I agree with Bengie, the Longhorn SDKs for both 32 and 64 bit platforms
> > >have been out since April 2005 released at WinHEC 2005. What in heavens
> > >name could be taking you so long to at least have something half workable
> > >by beta 2? I don't think you need Vista RTM to start creating even a buggy
> > >device driver.
> > > --
> > > --
> > > Andre
> > > Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
> > > Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
> > > Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
> > > http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
> > >
> > > "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <> wrote in message
> > > news:%23tYf%...
> > >> "Bengie" <> wrote in message
> > >> news:181A532D-F11C-4D65-9B7F-...
> > >>> It seems that despite the availability of Vista Beta for testing and
> > >>> development of drivers and utility applications for such an extended
> > >>> period,
> > >>> the majority of companies are very slow to get their Vista compatable
> > >>> versions onto their sites for download.
> > >>> Ati has a Vista Beta version of drivers for all their graphic cards and
> > >>> others could well do to follow their example.
> > >>> Now that Vista Beta is in the public domain and millions are trying it,
> > >>> it
> > >>> will never be fully compatable until companies wake up to the fact that
> > >>> the
> > >>> first release of Vista is not very far away and need to get their Vista
> > >>> versions of drivers and utilities into the public domain and available
> > >>> for
> > >>> download.
> > >>> Until this happens I think there are going to be many frustrating weeks
> > >>> or
> > >>> months ahead for those who are either doing testing and reporting and
> > >>> for
> > >>> those who are just trying Vista out of curiosity.
> > >>>
> > >>> TO ALL COMPANIES THAT PRODUCE SOFTWARE, GET YOU FINGER OUT AND GET YOUR
> > >>> DRIVERS ETC UP ON YOUR SITES. YOU ARE GOING TO BE LEFT BEHIND.
> > >>>
> > >>> YOU ARE ALSO FRUSTRATING THE FULL TESTING OF WINDOWS VISTA BETA.
> > >>
> > >> Cross posted to
> > >> microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
> > >> "Anyone who prefers security over freedom deserves neither."
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >

I emailed 3Com and never even got a response. Needless to say, I won't be
buying from 3Com.
dotcom

"Bengie" <> wrote in message
news:7C970009-D579-477D-8704-...
>I don't need telling twice - I will visit all the sites of the equipment I
> have and post my disatisfaction at their lack of progress. If ATI can do
> it
> for their full range of cards then so can the others, there is no excuse.
> If
> I get any response from them I bet it will say they are in development.
> They
> should have been in development 12 months ago. I will let you all know
> what
> I get in reply. It would be nice if some of you would join me in doing
> so.
> Thank you Bones.
>
> "Mark S-123" wrote:
>
>> Bones is correct!
>>
>> I have worked with PC's since they first came out and all the hardware
>> manufacturers operate the same way. They wait until a new operating
>> system is
>> out on the retail market before they start testing for support. I have
>> seen
>> some support not appear for 9 months after the OS is out.
>>
>> When I asked HP about my PC running on XP when it comes out they told me
>> I
>> should just buy a new PC instead of trying to run XP on my old one. I did
>> buy
>> a new PC, and of course it was NOT an HP.
>>
>> We need to keep asking the manufacturers through the forums, user groups
>> and
>> email.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> "Bones" wrote:
>>
>> > Couldn't agree more, although posting here probably isnt going to get
>> > the
>> > word out. If you have hardware and there are no Vista drivers yet, go
>> > to the
>> > manufactrer's websites and post on their forums, or nag them in emails,
>> > threaten to buy from their competition..if we complain enough they'll
>> > have
>> > to do something
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <> wrote in message
>> > news:...
>> > >I agree with Bengie, the Longhorn SDKs for both 32 and 64 bit
>> > >platforms
>> > >have been out since April 2005 released at WinHEC 2005. What in
>> > >heavens
>> > >name could be taking you so long to at least have something half
>> > >workable
>> > >by beta 2? I don't think you need Vista RTM to start creating even a
>> > >buggy
>> > >device driver.
>> > > --
>> > > --
>> > > Andre
>> > > Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
>> > > Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
>> > > Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
>> > > http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>> > >
>> > > "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <> wrote in message
>> > > news:%23tYf%...
>> > >> "Bengie" <> wrote in message
>> > >> news:181A532D-F11C-4D65-9B7F-...
>> > >>> It seems that despite the availability of Vista Beta for testing
>> > >>> and
>> > >>> development of drivers and utility applications for such an
>> > >>> extended
>> > >>> period,
>> > >>> the majority of companies are very slow to get their Vista
>> > >>> compatable
>> > >>> versions onto their sites for download.
>> > >>> Ati has a Vista Beta version of drivers for all their graphic cards
>> > >>> and
>> > >>> others could well do to follow their example.
>> > >>> Now that Vista Beta is in the public domain and millions are trying
>> > >>> it,
>> > >>> it
>> > >>> will never be fully compatable until companies wake up to the fact
>> > >>> that
>> > >>> the
>> > >>> first release of Vista is not very far away and need to get their
>> > >>> Vista
>> > >>> versions of drivers and utilities into the public domain and
>> > >>> available
>> > >>> for
>> > >>> download.
>> > >>> Until this happens I think there are going to be many frustrating
>> > >>> weeks
>> > >>> or
>> > >>> months ahead for those who are either doing testing and reporting
>> > >>> and
>> > >>> for
>> > >>> those who are just trying Vista out of curiosity.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> TO ALL COMPANIES THAT PRODUCE SOFTWARE, GET YOU FINGER OUT AND GET
>> > >>> YOUR
>> > >>> DRIVERS ETC UP ON YOUR SITES. YOU ARE GOING TO BE LEFT BEHIND.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> YOU ARE ALSO FRUSTRATING THE FULL TESTING OF WINDOWS VISTA BETA.
>> > >>
>> > >> Cross posted to
>> > >> microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
>> > >> "Anyone who prefers security over freedom deserves neither."
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >

I know - they are so rude and arrogant some times - just a "No comment" would
at least acknowledge that they received your email.

"dotcom" wrote:

> I emailed 3Com and never even got a response. Needless to say, I won't be
> buying from 3Com.
> dotcom
>
> "Bengie" <> wrote in message
> news:7C970009-D579-477D-8704-...
> >I don't need telling twice - I will visit all the sites of the equipment I
> > have and post my disatisfaction at their lack of progress. If ATI can do
> > it
> > for their full range of cards then so can the others, there is no excuse.
> > If
> > I get any response from them I bet it will say they are in development.
> > They
> > should have been in development 12 months ago. I will let you all know
> > what
> > I get in reply. It would be nice if some of you would join me in doing
> > so.
> > Thank you Bones.
> >
> > "Mark S-123" wrote:
> >
> >> Bones is correct!
> >>
> >> I have worked with PC's since they first came out and all the hardware
> >> manufacturers operate the same way. They wait until a new operating
> >> system is
> >> out on the retail market before they start testing for support. I have
> >> seen
> >> some support not appear for 9 months after the OS is out.
> >>
> >> When I asked HP about my PC running on XP when it comes out they told me
> >> I
> >> should just buy a new PC instead of trying to run XP on my old one. I did
> >> buy
> >> a new PC, and of course it was NOT an HP.
> >>
> >> We need to keep asking the manufacturers through the forums, user groups
> >> and
> >> email.
> >>
> >> Mark
> >>
> >>
> >> "Bones" wrote:
> >>
> >> > Couldn't agree more, although posting here probably isnt going to get
> >> > the
> >> > word out. If you have hardware and there are no Vista drivers yet, go
> >> > to the
> >> > manufactrer's websites and post on their forums, or nag them in emails,
> >> > threaten to buy from their competition..if we complain enough they'll
> >> > have
> >> > to do something
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <> wrote in message
> >> > news:...
> >> > >I agree with Bengie, the Longhorn SDKs for both 32 and 64 bit
> >> > >platforms
> >> > >have been out since April 2005 released at WinHEC 2005. What in
> >> > >heavens
> >> > >name could be taking you so long to at least have something half
> >> > >workable
> >> > >by beta 2? I don't think you need Vista RTM to start creating even a
> >> > >buggy
> >> > >device driver.
> >> > > --
> >> > > --
> >> > > Andre
> >> > > Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
> >> > > Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
> >> > > Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
> >> > > http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
> >> > >
> >> > > "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <> wrote in message
> >> > > news:%23tYf%...
> >> > >> "Bengie" <> wrote in message
> >> > >> news:181A532D-F11C-4D65-9B7F-...
> >> > >>> It seems that despite the availability of Vista Beta for testing
> >> > >>> and
> >> > >>> development of drivers and utility applications for such an
> >> > >>> extended
> >> > >>> period,
> >> > >>> the majority of companies are very slow to get their Vista
> >> > >>> compatable
> >> > >>> versions onto their sites for download.
> >> > >>> Ati has a Vista Beta version of drivers for all their graphic cards
> >> > >>> and
> >> > >>> others could well do to follow their example.
> >> > >>> Now that Vista Beta is in the public domain and millions are trying
> >> > >>> it,
> >> > >>> it
> >> > >>> will never be fully compatable until companies wake up to the fact
> >> > >>> that
> >> > >>> the
> >> > >>> first release of Vista is not very far away and need to get their
> >> > >>> Vista
> >> > >>> versions of drivers and utilities into the public domain and
> >> > >>> available
> >> > >>> for
> >> > >>> download.
> >> > >>> Until this happens I think there are going to be many frustrating
> >> > >>> weeks
> >> > >>> or
> >> > >>> months ahead for those who are either doing testing and reporting
> >> > >>> and
> >> > >>> for
> >> > >>> those who are just trying Vista out of curiosity.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> TO ALL COMPANIES THAT PRODUCE SOFTWARE, GET YOU FINGER OUT AND GET
> >> > >>> YOUR
> >> > >>> DRIVERS ETC UP ON YOUR SITES. YOU ARE GOING TO BE LEFT BEHIND.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> YOU ARE ALSO FRUSTRATING THE FULL TESTING OF WINDOWS VISTA BETA.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Cross posted to
> >> > >> microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
> >> > >> "Anyone who prefers security over freedom deserves neither."
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
>

If I had a product I valued and did not get a response from My Email, I
would send at least one more message preferably using their online form if
available.
It is always possible something got lost somewhere.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"dotcom" <> wrote in message
news:882083A2-7F34-47B2-840C-...
>I emailed 3Com and never even got a response. Needless to say, I won't be
>buying from 3Com.
> dotcom