Re: IE non responsive after waking from sleep

wasted wrote:

> Using Win 7 and IE 8.
>
> Sometimes, when I wake my computer from Sleep, everything is working
> except IE8. I can send/receive emails and use other web apps that
> don't use IE8, but IE8 itself just freezes in the opening window. The
> only way to get it functional again is to reboot (unless there are
> other ways I haven't discovered yet)
>
> The emphasis is on "sometimes" - most times it's quite OK after Sleep
> mode.

Try resuming from sleep mode and load IE8 in its no add-ons mode. Could
be you have a defective or incompatible add-on installed (or that you
migrated when updating from a prior version of IE).

Start looking at what security products that you installed which may
interfere or interrogate your web traffic. Could be one of them, like a
firewall with app rules, is ****ing up. See what happens if you load
into Windows' safe mode (which often does not load or disables the
security programs PLUS it eliminates all the other startups you
installed), let it go into sleep mode, resume from sleep mode, and then
retest IE to see if it has immediate connectivity.

> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5548 (20101020) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com

Please stop spamming Usenet with your particular choice for an
anti-virus security product. Configure ESET to *not* append its spam
promotional signature (which really is NOT a signature because there is
no sigdash delimiter line which means the BODY of your post has been
spamified) -- unless, of course, you really want to be viewed for all
your posts as their spamming affiliate. Besides, it makes you look
stupid. Oh yeah, because some text got appended to a post surely makes
it perfectly safe, uh huh, sure.

wasted wrote:

> "Stupid"? - a quite unnecessary insult after a well presented explanation,
> and really does you no favours. But I still say, thankyou for your reply and
> advice.

Even wizards might walk into a glass door occasionally. Despite testing
at a genius level, slamming into a closed glass door still makes them
look stupid. Come on, you're saying that in your entire life you
haven't done something really stupid and then slyly looked around to see
if anyone saw you do it?

wasted wrote:

> "VanguardLH" <> wrote in message
> news:i9o9vb$gj8$...
>> wasted wrote:
>>
>>> "Stupid"? - a quite unnecessary insult after a well presented
>>> explanation,
>>> and really does you no favours. But I still say, thankyou for your reply
>>> and
>>> advice.
>>
>> Even wizards might walk into a glass door occasionally. Despite testing
>> at a genius level, slamming into a closed glass door still makes them
>> look stupid. Come on, you're saying that in your entire life you
>> haven't done something really stupid and then slyly looked around to see
>> if anyone saw you do it?
>
> I think we see life and the concept of manners differently. I don't imagine
> either of us will lose sleep over that.
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5550 (20101021) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com

Since it is impossible to express behavior regarding manner without
doing so while you are living, there is difference. You are what you
do. Besides, I said "you look stupid". I didn't say "you are stupid".
Apparently you are perfect and never done anything that makes you look
stupid.

I see you have decided to continue spamming here. Well, I don't bother
with spammers. You will now be killfiled by me. Bye forever.

Ignore him. He's a pretentious condescending jerk.
"wasted" <> wrote in message
news: o.uk...
> Sorry if this is a duplicate post - I typed out my responses, but
> something SEEMED to go wrong when I clicked on Send - and I can't see that
> message anywhere. Try again
>
>
> "VanguardLH" <> wrote in message
> news:i9qu1v$bs9$...
>> wasted wrote:
>
>> Since it is impossible to express behavior regarding manner without
>> doing so while you are living, there is difference.
>
> Sorry I can't for the life of me understand what you are saying here.
>
> > Besides, I said "you look stupid". I didn't say "you are stupid".
>
> Again I think we have a quite different take on what represents good
> manners.
>
>> Apparently you are perfect
>
> There is absolutely nothing that I have said that could lead to such a
> conclusion.
>
>> I see you have decided to continue spamming here.
>
> No - I said earlier that I think you made a fair point about this and that
> I was going to look into how to stop the message appearing. I think I've
> now done it and will post this to test.
>
> > You will now be killfiled by me. Bye forever.
>
> Again - I don't think either of us will lose sleep about that.
>
> Thankyou again for your advice on the original issue.
>
>