Kenny Blankenship wrote:
> Extravagan <> wrote:
>> Kenny Blankenship wrote:
>>> [rude demand deleted]
>> Go **** yourself.
>
> ["rude" demand restored]
>
> [rude demand (and misquote) deleted]
>
> First, what was rude about that?
Among other things? You didn't say "please".
> Second, you're complaining that the contestant's employment contracts
> aren't being made public, you complaint would carry more weight if you
> publicised your employment contract.
Actually, to really put my money where my mouth was I'd have to be a
hirer and make public the terms of the contracts my employees were
expected to sign.
> You don't want to do that (and I don't blame you, I don't want to
> either) because it's nobody else's business.
The terms of transactions taking place in the marketplace should be
everyone's business. It's been shown that markets become more efficient
the more all of the participants know about the exact products, prices,
and terms and conditions applying.
> confidential.
"Confidential", in a business dealing, is synonymous with "we've got
something to hide". At best, it's trade secrecy of some sort -- an
attempt to hide some innovation from their competitors, which if
successful holds back progress. At worst, it means they're up to dirty
tricks of some kind, or even just keeping various things "confidential"
out of hide-bound tradition, in a cargo-cultish fashion without even
understanding what confidentiality is *for*.
--
"I hope there are a lot of hardcore scenes in it. There should be more
of those in film and theatre as well." -- Stephen Newport in
<6880-4C73775E->
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...7328fcf9d66063
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
