?Same here, IE9 beta is much faster then IE8. Running on windows 7 32bit.
--
Paul's XP and Vista Help
-----------------------------------------
www.paulsxp.com
---------------------------------------
Paul's Forum
--------------------------------------
www.paulsxp.com/forum
--------------------------------------
"bobster" <> wrote in message
news:i86eth$r5m$...
> ?FWIW, I downloaded IE9 Beta on Sept. 15th and have had virtually
> trouble-free performance. It is much faster than IE8, especially when
> using accelerators. My OS is W7, 32 bit.
>
> Realizing that there was risk involved, I retained my W7/IE8 on an
> external HD and can switch back to it at any time during the boot
> sequence. I will retain these two configurations until IE9 becomes final,
> then I'll clone that configuration from my "C" drive to the external HD
> and use it as my primary W7/IE9 backup.
>
> I also retain an XP/IE8 configuration on my second internal HD in case I
> find problems with W7 (which I've only had for 2-3 months - so far so
> good).
>
> This may sound like a lot of extra hardware but 320G HDs are about $50, a
> SATA-3 external enclosure is about $35 and good clone software is cheap or
> free.
>
> My advice is try IE9 Beta if you have a good clone backup, but if you
> don't, don't risk it.
>
> ================================================== ================================================== ====
>
> "species8350" wrote in message
> news:d725a9e5-a4af-4456-a9c6-...
>
> It looks like IE 9 in Beta form is available.
>
> Will this version be delivered through updates?
>
> I am wonderng if it might be best to wait untill the Beta trial is
> complete and a stable version is issued before installing.
>
> Any thoughts.
>
> Thanks
>
> S