Re: Jet Database Engine on Vista and Visio 2007

There's a list of Jet-related libraries in Microsoft's support article
(http://support.microsoft.com/kb/239114).

See the *Files in Windows Server 2003 SP1 and Windows 2000 Service Pack
4 Update Rollup 1* section.

You may be able to copy these from a non-hacked-to-pieces Windows
installation and regsvr32 them manually. No guarantees though.

- Rafael

Casper wrote:
> Is there any solution to bypass the error or to separately install the
> "Jet Database Engine" withouth having to re-install all of the
> operating system ?

<grin>

OK! You have the files. What about the hundreds/thousands of registry
entries that are almost surly needed also?

Lord, it's just easier to do a standard install.

--

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP
Windows Desktop Experience


"Rafael Rivera" <"[firstname]"@withinwindows.com> wrote in message
news:...
> There's a list of Jet-related libraries in Microsoft's support article
> (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/239114).
>
> See the *Files in Windows Server 2003 SP1 and Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
> Update Rollup 1* section.
>
> You may be able to copy these from a non-hacked-to-pieces Windows
> installation and regsvr32 them manually. No guarantees though.
>
> - Rafael
>
> Casper wrote:
>> Is there any solution to bypass the error or to separately install the
>> "Jet Database Engine" withouth having to re-install all of the
>> operating system ?

I agree 110%. That said, it would be an interesting experiment for the
original poster to perform. What does he have to lose?

- Rafael

Richard Urban wrote:
> <grin>
>
> OK! You have the files. What about the hundreds/thousands of registry
> entries that are almost surly needed also?
>
> Lord, it's just easier to do a standard install.
>

Nothing but his time. If he hoses his system we were already telling him to
reinstall. (-:

--

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP
Windows Desktop Experience


"Rafael Rivera" <"[firstname]"@withinwindows.com> wrote in message
news:%23aM%...
>I agree 110%. That said, it would be an interesting experiment for the
>original poster to perform. What does he have to lose?
>
> - Rafael
>
> Richard Urban wrote:
>> <grin>
>>
>> OK! You have the files. What about the hundreds/thousands of registry
>> entries that are almost surly needed also?
>>
>> Lord, it's just easier to do a standard install.
>>