On Jul 1, 1:15*am, PabloCruzio <PabloCru...@discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote:
> This is what happens when hardware and software vendors wait too long for
> emerging new operating systems. *Just look how quickly everyone forgot
> Windows 2000 to XP headaches. *It was so quick in the time from one to the
> other...
>
> "marx404" wrote:
> > because "anything" is better than Vista.
>
> > --
> > marx404
>
> > > Just out of curiosity by what makes anyone think that "Windows 7" is going
> > > to be "better than" Vista?
>
> > > --
> > > Bob
> > >http://www.kanyak.com
I think it's more that Vista doesn't meet the needs of business;
- and the few people out there who understand that Vista is a
poor performer in comparison to other OS's
""The numbers are striking... in the current survey, IT Execs .(.Who
figured they would upgrade to Vista ) total dropped to 8.1 percent.
Even more dramatically, just 20 percent of the execs now expect to
have deployed Vista three years after its launch, down from 67.6
percent a year ago."
http://weblog.infoworld.com/tech-bot...xp_micros.html
Everyone I know who was suckered into buying a PC with Vista is having
major problems doing even the simplest thing that they used to be able
to do in Windows XP.
I am recommending getting " XP Roll Back " disks
or else Ubunth
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
